Overview On Research Making: Alvin Concha, MD

Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 10

Overview on research making

Alvin Concha, MD
Research

 Asking questions
 Generating answers through a rigorous process
 Communicating the new information

Knowledge/information production
Advancement of medicine through research

What we What we
already already
know know
Life expectancy over the decades

The increased longevity of humans over the past century can be significantly
attributed to advances resulting from medical research. (http://wisconsinmedicalresearch.com)

75 years
67 years
65 years

50 years Human genome project


2003
Ciprofloxacin
1987 Angiotensin II vaccine
2008
Synthetic “human” insulin
1982
~30 years Penicillin
Measles vaccine
1963 Anti retroviral for AIDS
1928 1996
Polio vaccine
Syphilis study
1955 AIDS Levoflocacin
1932
Statins 1981 1993
Streptomycin
Arsphenamine 1971
1944
1908
Cefalexin
Lympoma antineoplastic 1970
1940

c.1800 1960 1990 2004 2050

Sources: http://muse.jhu.edu/login?uri=/journals/human_biology/v075/75.1demerath.html; Disease Control


Priorities in Developing Countries, second edition, 2006, Table 1.1; World Population Prospects: The 2006
Revision, Highlights. New York: United Nations. Table III.1
Bloom’s Taxonomy of Learning

Cognitive (knowledge)
 Recall Lower-order
 Comprehension thinking skills
 Application
 Analysis: Research (identification of knowledge gap)
Higher-order
 Synthesis: Research (introduction, methods, results) thinking skills
 Evaluation: Research (discussion)
Affective (attitudes)
Psychomotor (skills)
Research

RESIDENCY
Contribute to knowledge in your field
Knowledge production is the highest expression of learning

AIMS
To influence clinical practice
To influence health policies

GOOD RESEARCH
Comes out of a real and pressing clinical problem
Easily translatable to clinical practice
Research questions

Possible sources
 Experience
 Medical literature
 Local statistics (mortality, morbidity)
 Scientific gatherings
 Conferences
 Challenging clinical or healthcare management problems
 Casual conversations with friends, colleagues
 Skeptical attitude
Important questions to ask

Introduction – Why I did the research


 What is the topic? (background)
 What has been known about the topic? (review of related literature)
 What is not yet known about the topic? (research question)
 What will healthcare be if it will be known? (significance)
 What will my study do? (objectives)
The rest

Methodology – What I did


 replicability
Results – What I found out
 new knowledge generated
Discussion – What it might mean
 relation to knowledge base
 recommendations
 conclusions
FAQs

What are the parts of a proposal?


Is there any other research format?
Can we have a workshop for everyone in the department?
Do I need a statistician?
Do I need an adviser/research consultant?
Do I need Ethics Committee clearance?
Can I write the (dummy) abstract first?
Can I collect data first, then write everything later?
What is the sample size that I need for my study?
Prospective versus retrospective data collection?
Why is winning a research contest not tantamount to having
undergone an HRC Research Review Process?
HRC Research Review Joining a research contest
Process and winning a prize
1- Review 1- Review
2- Feedback: what’s good, 2- Feedback: what’s good,
what should be changed and what should be changed and
what should be taken out what should be taken out.
3- System to ensure that
changes are carried out.

The HRC stands on its own set of standards for assessing


research papers, and is not accountable to other sets of
standards.

You might also like