UNIVERSITY INSTITUTE OF

ENGINEERING
DEPARTMENT OF COMPUTER
SCIENCE AND ENGG.
Bachelor of Engineering (Computer Science & Engineering)
DATA STRUCTURES 21CSH-211

STACK DISCOVER . LEARN . EMPOWER

QuickSort
QuickSort is one of the most efficient sorting algorithms and is based
on the splitting of an array into smaller ones. The name comes from
the fact that, quick sort is capable of sorting a list of data elements
significantly faster than any of the common sorting algorithms. And
like Merge sort, Quick sort also falls into the category of divide and
conquer approach of problem-solving methodology.

2
• Taking the analogical view in perspective, consider a situation where one had to sort the
papers bearing the names of the students, by name. One might use the approach as
follows:
• Select a splitting value, say L. The splitting value is also known as Pivot.
• Divide the stack of papers into two. A-L and M-Z. It is not necessary that the piles should be equal.
• Repeat the above two steps with the A-L pile, splitting it into its significant two halves. And M-Z
pile, split into its halves. The process is repeated until the piles are small enough to be sorted
easily.
• Ultimately, the smaller piles can be placed one on top of the other to produce a fully sorted and
ordered set of papers.
• The approach used here is recursion at each split to get to the single-element array.
• At every split, the pile was divided and then the same approach was used for the
smaller piles.
• Due to these features, quick sort is also called as partition exchange sort.
• https://youtu.be/yIQuKSwPlro
• https://youtu.be/cnzIChso3cc

3
Quicksort Algorithm
Given an array of n elements (e.g., integers):
• If array only contains one element, return
• Else
• pick one element to use as pivot.
• Partition elements into two sub-arrays:
• Elements less than or equal to pivot
• Elements greater than pivot
• Quicksort two sub-arrays
• Return results
Example
We are given array of n integers to sort:

40 20 10 80 60 50 7 30 100
Pick Pivot Element
There are a number of ways to pick the pivot element. In this example, we will
use the first element in the array:

40 20 10 80 60 50 7 30 100
Partitioning Array
Given a pivot, partition the elements of the array such that the
resulting array consists of:
1. One sub-array that contains elements >= pivot
2. Another sub-array that contains elements < pivot

The sub-arrays are stored in the original data array.

Partitioning loops through, swapping elements below/above pivot.

pivot_index = 0 40 20 10 80 60 50 7 30 100

[0] [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8]

too_big_index too_small_index
 1. While data[too_big_index] <= data[pivot]
++too_big_index

pivot_index = 0 40 20 10 80 60 50 7 30 100

[0] [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8]

too_big_index too_small_index
 1. While data[too_big_index] <= data[pivot]
++too_big_index

pivot_index = 0 40 20 10 80 60 50 7 30 100

[0] [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8]

too_big_index too_small_index
 1. While data[too_big_index] <= data[pivot]
++too_big_index

pivot_index = 0 40 20 10 80 60 50 7 30 100

[0] [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8]

too_big_index too_small_index
 1. While data[too_big_index] <= data[pivot]
++too_big_index
2. While data[too_small_index] > data[pivot]
--too_small_index

pivot_index = 0 40 20 10 80 60 50 7 30 100

[0] [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8]

too_big_index too_small_index
 1. While data[too_big_index] <= data[pivot]
++too_big_index
2. While data[too_small_index] > data[pivot]
--too_small_index

pivot_index = 0 40 20 10 80 60 50 7 30 100

[0] [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8]

too_big_index too_small_index
 1. While data[too_big_index] <= data[pivot]
++too_big_index
2. While data[too_small_index] > data[pivot]
--too_small_index
3. If too_big_index < too_small_index
swap data[too_big_index] and data[too_small_index]

pivot_index = 0 40 20 10 80 60 50 7 30 100

[0] [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8]

too_big_index too_small_index
 1. While data[too_big_index] <= data[pivot]
++too_big_index
2. While data[too_small_index] > data[pivot]
--too_small_index
3. If too_big_index < too_small_index
swap data[too_big_index] and data[too_small_index]

pivot_index = 0 40 20 10 30 60 50 7 80 100

[0] [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8]

too_big_index too_small_index
 1. While data[too_big_index] <= data[pivot]
++too_big_index
2. While data[too_small_index] > data[pivot]
--too_small_index
3. If too_big_index < too_small_index
swap data[too_big_index] and data[too_small_index]
4. While too_small_index > too_big_index, go to 1.

pivot_index = 0 40 20 10 30 60 50 7 80 100

[0] [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8]

too_big_index too_small_index
 1. While data[too_big_index] <= data[pivot]
++too_big_index
2. While data[too_small_index] > data[pivot]
--too_small_index
3. If too_big_index < too_small_index
swap data[too_big_index] and data[too_small_index]
4. While too_small_index > too_big_index, go to 1.

pivot_index = 0 40 20 10 30 60 50 7 80 100

[0] [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8]

too_big_index too_small_index
 1. While data[too_big_index] <= data[pivot]
++too_big_index
2. While data[too_small_index] > data[pivot]
--too_small_index
3. If too_big_index < too_small_index
swap data[too_big_index] and data[too_small_index]
4. While too_small_index > too_big_index, go to 1.

pivot_index = 0 40 20 10 30 60 50 7 80 100

[0] [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8]

too_big_index too_small_index
 1. While data[too_big_index] <= data[pivot]
++too_big_index
2. While data[too_small_index] > data[pivot]
--too_small_index
3. If too_big_index < too_small_index
swap data[too_big_index] and data[too_small_index]
4. While too_small_index > too_big_index, go to 1.

pivot_index = 0 40 20 10 30 60 50 7 80 100

[0] [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8]

too_big_index too_small_index
 1. While data[too_big_index] <= data[pivot]
++too_big_index
2. While data[too_small_index] > data[pivot]
--too_small_index
3. If too_big_index < too_small_index
swap data[too_big_index] and data[too_small_index]
4. While too_small_index > too_big_index, go to 1.

pivot_index = 0 40 20 10 30 60 50 7 80 100

[0] [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8]

too_big_index too_small_index
 1. While data[too_big_index] <= data[pivot]
++too_big_index
2. While data[too_small_index] > data[pivot]
--too_small_index
3. If too_big_index < too_small_index
swap data[too_big_index] and data[too_small_index]
4. While too_small_index > too_big_index, go to 1.

pivot_index = 0 40 20 10 30 60 50 7 80 100

[0] [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8]

too_big_index too_small_index
 1. While data[too_big_index] <= data[pivot]
++too_big_index
2. While data[too_small_index] > data[pivot]
--too_small_index
3. If too_big_index < too_small_index
swap data[too_big_index] and data[too_small_index]
4. While too_small_index > too_big_index, go to 1.

pivot_index = 0 40 20 10 30 7 50 60 80 100

[0] [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8]

too_big_index too_small_index
 1. While data[too_big_index] <= data[pivot]
++too_big_index
2. While data[too_small_index] > data[pivot]
--too_small_index
3. If too_big_index < too_small_index
swap data[too_big_index] and data[too_small_index]
4. While too_small_index > too_big_index, go to 1.

pivot_index = 0 40 20 10 30 7 50 60 80 100

[0] [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8]

too_big_index too_small_index
 1. While data[too_big_index] <= data[pivot]
++too_big_index
2. While data[too_small_index] > data[pivot]
--too_small_index
3. If too_big_index < too_small_index
swap data[too_big_index] and data[too_small_index]
4. While too_small_index > too_big_index, go to 1.

pivot_index = 0 40 20 10 30 7 50 60 80 100

[0] [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8]

too_big_index too_small_index
 1. While data[too_big_index] <= data[pivot]
++too_big_index
2. While data[too_small_index] > data[pivot]
--too_small_index
3. If too_big_index < too_small_index
swap data[too_big_index] and data[too_small_index]
4. While too_small_index > too_big_index, go to 1.

pivot_index = 0 40 20 10 30 7 50 60 80 100

[0] [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8]

too_big_index too_small_index
 1. While data[too_big_index] <= data[pivot]
++too_big_index
2. While data[too_small_index] > data[pivot]
--too_small_index
3. If too_big_index < too_small_index
swap data[too_big_index] and data[too_small_index]
4. While too_small_index > too_big_index, go to 1.

pivot_index = 0 40 20 10 30 7 50 60 80 100

[0] [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8]

too_big_index too_small_index
 1. While data[too_big_index] <= data[pivot]
++too_big_index
2. While data[too_small_index] > data[pivot]
--too_small_index
3. If too_big_index < too_small_index
swap data[too_big_index] and data[too_small_index]
4. While too_small_index > too_big_index, go to 1.

pivot_index = 0 40 20 10 30 7 50 60 80 100

[0] [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8]

too_big_index too_small_index
 1. While data[too_big_index] <= data[pivot]
++too_big_index
2. While data[too_small_index] > data[pivot]
--too_small_index
3. If too_big_index < too_small_index
swap data[too_big_index] and data[too_small_index]
4. While too_small_index > too_big_index, go to 1.

pivot_index = 0 40 20 10 30 7 50 60 80 100

[0] [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8]

too_big_index too_small_index
 1. While data[too_big_index] <= data[pivot]
++too_big_index
2. While data[too_small_index] > data[pivot]
--too_small_index
3. If too_big_index < too_small_index
swap data[too_big_index] and data[too_small_index]
4. While too_small_index > too_big_index, go to 1.

pivot_index = 0 40 20 10 30 7 50 60 80 100

[0] [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8]

too_big_index too_small_index
 1. While data[too_big_index] <= data[pivot]
++too_big_index
2. While data[too_small_index] > data[pivot]
--too_small_index
3. If too_big_index < too_small_index
swap data[too_big_index] and data[too_small_index]
4. While too_small_index > too_big_index, go to 1.

pivot_index = 0 40 20 10 30 7 50 60 80 100

[0] [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8]

too_big_index too_small_index
 1. While data[too_big_index] <= data[pivot]
++too_big_index
2. While data[too_small_index] > data[pivot]
--too_small_index
3. If too_big_index < too_small_index
swap data[too_big_index] and data[too_small_index]
4. While too_small_index > too_big_index, go to 1.
5. Swap data[too_small_index] and data[pivot_index]

pivot_index = 0 40 20 10 30 7 50 60 80 100

[0] [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8]

too_big_index too_small_index
 1. While data[too_big_index] <= data[pivot]
++too_big_index
2. While data[too_small_index] > data[pivot]
--too_small_index
3. If too_big_index < too_small_index
swap data[too_big_index] and data[too_small_index]
4. While too_small_index > too_big_index, go to 1.
5. Swap data[too_small_index] and data[pivot_index]

pivot_index = 4 7 20 10 30 40 50 60 80 100

[0] [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8]

too_big_index too_small_index
Partition Result

7 20 10 30 40 50 60 80 100

[0] [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8]

<= data[pivot] > data[pivot]

Recursion: Quicksort Sub-arrays

7 20 10 30 40 50 60 80 100

[0] [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8]

<= data[pivot] > data[pivot]

Quicksort Analysis
• Assume that keys are random, uniformly distributed.
• What is best case running time?
Quicksort Analysis
• Assume that keys are random, uniformly distributed.
• What is best case running time?
• Recursion:
1. Partition splits array in two sub-arrays of size n/2
2. Quicksort each sub-array
Quicksort Analysis
• Assume that keys are random, uniformly distributed.
• What is best case running time?
• Recursion:
1. Partition splits array in two sub-arrays of size n/2
2. Quicksort each sub-array
• Depth of recursion tree?
Quicksort Analysis
• Assume that keys are random, uniformly distributed.
• What is best case running time?
• Recursion:
1. Partition splits array in two sub-arrays of size n/2
2. Quicksort each sub-array
• Depth of recursion tree? O(log2n)
Quicksort Analysis
• Assume that keys are random, uniformly distributed.
• What is best case running time?
• Recursion:
1. Partition splits array in two sub-arrays of size n/2
2. Quicksort each sub-array
• Depth of recursion tree? O(log2n)
• Number of accesses in partition?
Quicksort Analysis
• Assume that keys are random, uniformly distributed.
• What is best case running time?
• Recursion:
1. Partition splits array in two sub-arrays of size n/2
2. Quicksort each sub-array
• Depth of recursion tree? O(log2n)
• Number of accesses in partition? O(n)
Quicksort Analysis
• Assume that keys are random, uniformly distributed.
• Best case running time: O(n log2n)
Quicksort Analysis
• Assume that keys are random, uniformly distributed.
• Best case running time: O(n log2n)
• Worst case running time?
Quicksort: Worst Case
• Assume first element is chosen as pivot.
• Assume we get array that is already in order:

pivot_index = 0 2 4 10 12 13 50 57 63 100

[0] [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8]

too_big_index too_small_index
1. While data[too_big_index] <= data[pivot]
++too_big_index
2. While data[too_small_index] > data[pivot]
--too_small_index
3. If too_big_index < too_small_index
swap data[too_big_index] and data[too_small_index]
4. While too_small_index > too_big_index, go to 1.
5. Swap data[too_small_index] and data[pivot_index]

pivot_index = 0 2 4 10 12 13 50 57 63 100

[0] [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8]

too_big_index too_small_index
1. While data[too_big_index] <= data[pivot]
++too_big_index
2. While data[too_small_index] > data[pivot]
--too_small_index
3. If too_big_index < too_small_index
swap data[too_big_index] and data[too_small_index]
4. While too_small_index > too_big_index, go to 1.
5. Swap data[too_small_index] and data[pivot_index]

pivot_index = 0 2 4 10 12 13 50 57 63 100

[0] [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8]

too_big_index too_small_index
1. While data[too_big_index] <= data[pivot]
++too_big_index
2. While data[too_small_index] > data[pivot]
--too_small_index
3. If too_big_index < too_small_index
swap data[too_big_index] and data[too_small_index]
4. While too_small_index > too_big_index, go to 1.
5. Swap data[too_small_index] and data[pivot_index]

pivot_index = 0 2 4 10 12 13 50 57 63 100

[0] [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8]

too_big_index too_small_index
1. While data[too_big_index] <= data[pivot]
++too_big_index
2. While data[too_small_index] > data[pivot]
--too_small_index
3. If too_big_index < too_small_index
swap data[too_big_index] and data[too_small_index]
4. While too_small_index > too_big_index, go to 1.
5. Swap data[too_small_index] and data[pivot_index]

pivot_index = 0 2 4 10 12 13 50 57 63 100

[0] [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8]

too_big_index too_small_index
1. While data[too_big_index] <= data[pivot]
++too_big_index
2. While data[too_small_index] > data[pivot]
--too_small_index
3. If too_big_index < too_small_index
swap data[too_big_index] and data[too_small_index]
4. While too_small_index > too_big_index, go to 1.
5. Swap data[too_small_index] and data[pivot_index]

pivot_index = 0 2 4 10 12 13 50 57 63 100

[0] [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8]

too_big_index too_small_index
1. While data[too_big_index] <= data[pivot]
++too_big_index
2. While data[too_small_index] > data[pivot]
--too_small_index
3. If too_big_index < too_small_index
swap data[too_big_index] and data[too_small_index]
4. While too_small_index > too_big_index, go to 1.
5. Swap data[too_small_index] and data[pivot_index]

pivot_index = 0 2 4 10 12 13 50 57 63 100

[0] [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8]

too_big_index too_small_index
 1. While data[too_big_index] <= data[pivot]
++too_big_index
2. While data[too_small_index] > data[pivot]
--too_small_index
3. If too_big_index < too_small_index
swap data[too_big_index] and data[too_small_index]
4. While too_small_index > too_big_index, go to 1.
5. Swap data[too_small_index] and data[pivot_index]

pivot_index = 0 2 4 10 12 13 50 57 63 100

[0] [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8]

<= data[pivot] > data[pivot]

Quicksort Analysis
• Assume that keys are random, uniformly distributed.
• Best case running time: O(n log2n)
• Worst case running time?
• Recursion:
1. Partition splits array in two sub-arrays:
• one sub-array of size 0
• the other sub-array of size n-1
2. Quicksort each sub-array
• Depth of recursion tree?
Quicksort Analysis
• Assume that keys are random, uniformly distributed.
• Best case running time: O(n log2n)
• Worst case running time?
• Recursion:
1. Partition splits array in two sub-arrays:
• one sub-array of size 0
• the other sub-array of size n-1
2. Quicksort each sub-array
• Depth of recursion tree? O(n)
Quicksort Analysis
• Assume that keys are random, uniformly distributed.
• Best case running time: O(n log2n)
• Worst case running time?
• Recursion:
1. Partition splits array in two sub-arrays:
• one sub-array of size 0
• the other sub-array of size n-1
2. Quicksort each sub-array
• Depth of recursion tree? O(n)
• Number of accesses per partition?
Quicksort Analysis
• Assume that keys are random, uniformly distributed.
• Best case running time: O(n log2n)
• Worst case running time?
• Recursion:
1. Partition splits array in two sub-arrays:
• one sub-array of size 0
• the other sub-array of size n-1
2. Quicksort each sub-array
• Depth of recursion tree? O(n)
• Number of accesses per partition? O(n)
Quicksort Analysis
• Assume that keys are random, uniformly distributed.
• Best case running time: O(n log2n)
• Worst case running time: O(n2)!!!
 References
• https://www.cs.cmu.edu/
• https://www.geeksforgeeks.org/queue-set-1introduction-and-array-implementation/
• https://www.geeksforgeeks.org/circular-queue-set-1-introduction-array-implementation/
• Lipschutz, Seymour, “Data Structures”, Schaum's Outline Series, Tata McGraw Hill.
• Gilberg/Forouzan,” Data Structure with C ,Cengage Learning.
• Augenstein,Moshe J , Tanenbaum, Aaron M, “Data Structures using C and C++”, Prentice Hall of India.
• Goodrich, Michael T., Tamassia, Roberto, and Mount, David M., “Data Structures and Algorithms in C++”,
Wiley Student Edition.
• Aho, Alfred V., Ullman, Jeffrey D., Hopcroft ,John E. “Data Structures and Algorithms”, Addison Wesley

56
Thank You

57