SWPP - SW Project Devt and MNGT
SWPP - SW Project Devt and MNGT
Resources Products
Services • classes
•staff
∙volunteers • training taught
∙equipment ∙ education ∙ counseling
∙ counseling sessions
& supplies conducted
∙budgets ∙ mentoring ∙ educational
∙ internships materials
Constraints distributed
∙regulations ∙ hours of
∙laws service
delivered
∙ participants
served
OUTCOMES
Resources Services Products Benefits for
•classes People
•staff • training
• education taught new knowledge
• volunteers • counseling increased skills
• counseling
• equipment • mentoring changed attitudes
sessions
• supplies • internships or values
conducted
• budget
• educational
Constraints materials
regulations distributed modified behavior
•laws • hours of
service improved
delivered condition
• participants
served altered status
Institutional
The likely or Change: values,short-term
achieved ethic, rules, laws
and–
associated
medium-termwith/toeffects
institutional
of anperformance,
access.
intervention’s outputs.
Behavioural change: knowledge, skills, attitude
improved and practiced (individual level)
Products, services,
Tangible result from
knowledge/skills
the completion
of activities
gained as a result
within
of participating
a developmentin an
intervention.
activity
PART IV
PROJECT CYCLE
MANAGEMENT
Stages in the Project Cycle
Impact
Assessment Problem/Needs
Identification
Project Designing/
Evaluation
Planning
Appraisal
Monitoring Implementation
Stages in the Project Cycle
Gather information, examine the context,
Problem/Needs
understand problems, causes and effects. Find
Identification
out who is involved, and what their capacities are
Conduct/delivery/implementation of the
Implementation
project activities
Operational plans
🞂 It involve continuous activities, and are usually
updated annually to reflect changes in the
activities, costs and income from the project.
LOGICAL FRAMEWORK APPROACH
🞂Developed in the US during the seventies as a
project planning method of USAID.
🞂The LFA is based on the concept of management
by objectives.
🞂It is a project design methodology based on
systematic analysis of development situation,
looking into key development problems, and the
options for addressing those problems. It is both a
planning and evaluation tool for project
management.
The LOGFRAME MATRIX is a concise document that outlines the key
features that lead to a project achieving its goal. It is a participatory
Planning, Monitoring & Evaluation tool whose power depends on the
degree to which it incorporates the full range of views of intended
beneficiaries and others who have a stake in the programme design.
Overall
Goal
Purpose
Output
Activities
Input
49
Components of the Log-Frame Matrix
🞂Goal (Impact). It is a very general, high-level and long-term
objective of the project. The goal cannot be achieved by the
project on its own since there will be other forces like the
government and other agencies also working to achieve it.
🞂Purpose (Outcome). The impact is the longer-term result
that has happened because of the activities undertaken in the
project. These are results that have been or that are to be
achieved after a period of time, but not immediate.
🞂Outputs. These are immediate results that we achieve soon
after the completion of the project or any specific project
activity
Components of the Log-Frame Matrix
🞂Activities. These are actions undertaken by the project or
the organization
🞂Inputs. Necessary resources needed for the project
🞂Indicators. These are a measure of the result. They give
a sense of what has been or what is to be achieved.
🞂Means of Verification. Data or information based on
which the indicators will be measured or monitored
🞂Risks & Assumptions. External factors affecting the
progress of the project
🞂Costs. Budgetary explanations
The Logic of the Framework
Overall ATTAINED
Goal
Purpose + ACHIEVED
+
Output PRODUCED
+
Activities IMPLEMENTED
53
a. Problem Analysis
G D.
Some irrigation Rice production is insufficient for the
structures population of village x
have been
destroyed F
The irrigation system
is faulty
A E
Support Agricultural practices are unsuitable
services for
farmers are C
not available The system B
in the area receives The farmers have no
no maintenance investment capacity
a. Problem analysis
Problem tree
EFFECTS
Rice production is insufficient for
the population of village x
CAUSES
55
b. Objectives Analysis
Transforming Problems into Objectives
56
b. Objectives Analysis
Objectives’ tree
ENDS
Rice production is sufficient for
the population of village x
MEANS
57
c. Strategy/Alternative Analysis
SPECIFIC
The irrigation system is Agricultural practices are
working appropriate OBJECTIVE
(Purpose/Outcome)
CHOSEN STRATEGY
58
Indicators
▪ These are measures of performance
▪ Evidence or proof that a result(s) have been achieved or
attained.
▪ Sometimes referred to as “success indicators” or
“objectively verifiable indicators (OVI)”
▪ Indicators describe how the intended results will be
measured, (objectively verifiable), for accountability
purposes
▪ Must be accompanied by baselines and targets
Establishment of baseline & target data
🞂Data or information in the subject area of the intended
project should be gathered during the situational analysis
🞂Collection and analysis of such data form the baseline data
for developing indicators for measuring outputs and
results.
🞂Baseline Data – refers to data/information in the subject
area of the intended project that should be gathered during
the project identification process & analyzed to assess the
condition or situation of the targeted populations or areas.
Baseline, Targets and Achievement
Planned Level of Achievement
Target
Achievement
Baseline
Current
Level of
Achievement
Project Appraisal
Project formulation begins with the drafting of a proposal for sponsorship
(otherwise termed concept proposal) that lays out preliminary ideas,
objectives, results, strategies, outputs and activities.
This concept proposal (abstract of a complete project proposal) is used as
basis for consultations with implementing partners and governments.
Feasibility study
🞂 A feasibility study should form the core of the proposal preparation
process. Its purpose is to provide stakeholders with the basis for deciding
whether or not to proceed with the project and for choosing the most
desirable options.
🞂 The feasibility study guides project managers in proposing reasonable and
achievable targets or outcomes.
🞂 Feasibility studies can cover the following areas: technical, marketing,
management and personnel, social, financial, & environmental.
3.Project Implementation
The process whereby “project inputs are converted
to project outputs”. May be looked at as:
– Putting in action the activities of the project.
– Putting into practice what was proposed in the
project document (i.e. transforming the project
proposal into the actual project.)
– Management of the project or executing the
project intentions.
3.Project Implementation
Project activation
🞂This means making arrangements to have
the project started. It involves coordination
and allocation of resources to make project
operational.
Project operation
🞂This is practical management of a project.
Here, project inputs are transformed into
outputs to achieve immediate objectives.
Approaches to Project Implementation
Top-down approach
• Implementation mainly done by agencies from
outside the community with limited involvement by
the beneficiaries.
Bottom-up approach
• Beneficiaries implement the project. Outside agencies
may provide the financial resources and technical
assistance.
Collaborative participatory approach
• Both top-down and bottom-up approaches to project
implementation are applied in the process.
4. Project Monitoring
🞂Monitoring is a continuous process that aims primarily to
provide project management and give the main stakeholders
early indications of progress or lack of progress towards
achieving project objectives.
🞂A progress analysis during project implementation through
monitoring serves to validate the initial assessment of
relevance, effectiveness and efficiency or to fill in the gaps. It
may also detect early signs of the project’s success or failure.
🞂Monitoring is an internal process that also looks at project
processes (both programmatic and financial) and makes
changes in assumptions and risks associated with target
groups, institutions or the surrounding environment.
E. Project Evaluation
🞂Evaluation is a time-bound exercise that attempts to assess
the relevance, performance and success of current or
completed projects, systematically and objectively.
🞂Evaluation determines to what extent the intervention has
been successful in terms of its impact, effectiveness,
sustainability of results, and contribution to capacity
development.
🞂Evaluation, more than monitoring, asks fundamental
questions on the how and why of the overall progress and
results of an intervention in order to improve performance
and generate lessons learned.
Kinds of Evaluation
1. Summative Evaluation
This focus on assessing outcomes or impacts at the
end of a project or activity.
2. Formative evaluation
This focuses on the process and approaches
undertaken for the project and may be based on
views gathered from a range of audiences, including
the target audience, those affected by the results, and
the project team themselves.
Evaluation Design
🞂The design of a program evaluation sets out the
combination of research methods that will be
used to provide evidence for the key evaluation
questions being addressed in the evaluation brief.
🞂The design defines the data that is needed for the
evaluation, and when and how it will be
collected.
Evaluation Methods
⮚Quantitative methods are used to measure the
extent and pattern of outcomes across a program
using surveys, outcome measures and administrative
data.
⮚Qualitative methods use observation, in-depth
interviews, and focus groups to explore in detail the
behaviour of people and organisations and enrich
quantitative findings.
A. Process Evaluation
⮚Explore evaluation questions about program
implementation.
⮚They may describe implementation processes and the
pattern of uptake of or engagement with services, check
whether a program is being implemented as expected, and
differentiate bad design (theory failure) from poor
implementation (implementation failure).
⮚Process evaluations can be used periodically to undertake
cycles of program improvement by informing adjustments
to delivery or testing alternative program delivery
processes.
B. Outcome Evaluation
(Sometimes called impact or results evaluation) aims to determine
whether the program caused demonstrable effects on the defined
target outcomes.
Outcome Indicators
⮚An indicator provides evidence that a certain condition exists or
certain results have or have not been achieved (Brizius & Campbell,
p.A-15)
⮚Indicators enable decision-makers to assess progress towards the
achievement of intended outputs, outcomes, goals, and objectives. As
such, indicators are an integral part of a results-based accountability
system.
C. Economic Evaluation
🞂Economic evaluation is used in a summative way to
determine whether the program has been cost-effective
or whether the benefits exceed the costs, drawing upon
the findings of outcome evaluation.
🞂Economic evaluation is also used with a formative
purpose during the program design stage to compare
different potential options, using modelling of the
likely outputs and outcomes, referred to as ex- ante
evaluation.
Different Forms of Economic Evaluation
1. Efficiency Analysis- focuses on the inputs-outputs relationships and
can bring useful insights into delivery processes that can point to
opportunities for cost-optimisation.
2. Cost-effectiveness analysis- extends the analysis to intended
outcomes. . It can be used to compare the cost-effectiveness of
different programs with the same outcomes, or to determine the most
cost-effective delivery options within the same program.
3. Cost-benefit analysis- is the most comprehensive of the economic
appraisal techniques. It quantifies in money terms all the major costs
and benefits of a program with a view to determining whether the
benefits exceed the costs, and if so by how much (expressed as a ratio
of benefits to costs).
Other Cross Cutting Considerations in
Project Design
- Environmental compliance
- Labor standards compliance
- Analysis for discriminatory tendencies
(PWDs, Senior Citizens, LGBT, etc)
- Financial considerations
Financial Considerations in Project
Management and Development
🞂Financial management involves the
acquisition, handling and control of the
funds of the organization. Adequate internal
control mechanisms and checks and
balances are put in place to ensure that
these funds are optimized for the pursuit of
the organization's mission.
Financial Considerations in Project
Management and Development
Accounting Auditing
The systematic and
It is a review of the
comprehensive recording of
financial transactions organization's financial
pertaining to the financial statements for the purpose
activities of an organization. of providing independent
This also refers to the process confirmation of the financial
of summarizing, analyzing and picture of the organization.
reporting these transactions.
Financial Statements
🞂These are a collection of reports about an
organization's financial results, financial
condition, and cash flows usually done when a
fiscal year ended.
🞂It basically represents a formal record of the
financial activities which contains written reports
that quantify the financial strength, performance
and liquidity of an organization or company.
🞂Direct costs are expenditures directly
benefiting your target group/ beneficiaries
while indirect cost are those which do not
directly benefit your target group. They are
also referred to as program cost and
administrative cost respectively.
2. Interviews
🞂 Informal interviews
🞂 Unstructured interviews
🞂 Semi-structured interviews
🞂 Structured interviews
🞂Group discussion
🞂The community can also participate in research groups to
determine the needs of diverse members as well as the
community as a whole.
🞂Brainstorming (free listing)
🞂It is an effective tool to gather ideas, opinions, and
information and for stimulating creative thinking,
generating new ideas, and ensuring that everyone’s
perspective is captured.
🞂Focus groups . Focus groups are small groups usually
selected to provide specialized input to data collection, or
to develop an idea or subject in depth for later use in
interviews, surveys or a large group discussion.
🞂Role playing and fishbowls
🞂Asking community members to role play is an effective
way of sharing experience and building understanding
of an issue or situation in the community.
🞂The role play can be presented in a fishbowl, in which
the role play is performed at the center of a circle so
everyone can see. At the conclusion of the role play,
community members can comment on what they
observed and share ideas about how to deal with the
issue or situation.
Participatory
Planning
Tools
10
3
What is a GANNT chart?
🞂The first Gantt chart was devised in the mid 1890s by
Karol Adamiecki, a Polish engineer who ran a
steelworks in southern Poland and had become
interested in management ideas and techniques.
🞂Some 15 years after Adamiecki, Henry Gantt, an
American engineer and management consultant,
devised his own version of the chart and it was this
that became widely known and popular in western
countries. Consequently it was Henry Gantt whose
name was to become associated with charts of this
type
What is a GANNT chart?
🞂A Gantt chart, commonly used in project management, is
one of the most popular and useful ways of showing
activities (tasks or events) displayed against time.
🞂On the left of the chart is a list of the activities and along the
top is a suitable time scale.
🞂Each activity is represented by a bar; the position and length
of the bar reflects the start date, duration and end date of the
activity.
🞂A Gantt chart shows you what has to be done (the activities)
& when (the schedule).
🞂Also called “chronogram”
PERT/CPM for Project Scheduling & Management