Analisis Shampoo
Analisis Shampoo
Analisis Shampoo
SHAMPOO
Shampoo adalah produk kosmetik yang digunakan untuk membersihkan rambut dan kulit kepala, dan mengandung
beberapa jenis konstituen dalam formulasinya seperti surfaktan, pelarut, zat pewarna, penyesuaian pH, pengikat,
pengawet, dan sebagainya[1].
Kata sampo berasal dari kata India cāpnā yang berarti "dorongan," yang diperluas untuk menunjukkan tindakan mencuci
rambut [2]
Sampo yang tersedia di pasaran terdapat dalam berbagai bentuk seperti bubuk, cairan, lotion, krim, jeli, dan aerosol. [3]
Beberapa bahan dapat ditambahkan ke sampo untuk mengkhususkan aplikasinya, misalnya sampo antidandruff, sampo
bayi, sampo kecantikan, dan sebagainya. [2]
FORMULASI HERBAL SHAMPOO
The formulation procedure was executed at the temperature of 70°C. Texapon® and Dehyton® (pH regulator)
were mixed and the extract was added, followed by addition of a mixture of methyl and propyl paraben
(preservatives) in water, 1.3 g of salt, 1.6 g of cocamide diethanolamine (CDE; foaming agent), and 0.7 g of salt. The
temperature was then reduced to 45°C, and Citrus aurantium essential oil in 0.9 g of CDE was added [Table 1].
Finally, the mixture was eluted with water to the final volume. Similarly, as a control test, the nonherbal shampoo
without the extract was also tested.
FORMULASI SEDIAAN SHAMPOO
Formulasi sediaan shampoo mengikuti prosedur yang telah dilakukan oleh Azadbakht M et al, 2018
ANALISIS SEDIAAN SHAMPOO
Physical appearance/visual inspection
The formulated shampoo was evaluated for physical characteristics including color, clarity, and odor.[6]
Determination of pH
The pH of 10% solution of formulated shampoo in distilled water was measured using a pH meter at room temperature.[17]
A sample of formulated shampoo was kept at a temperature of 105°C for 3 h and weighed. The measured weight is the
amount of solid contents.[8]
Wetting time test
Based on Draves method, a 5 g cotton skein connected to a 2.5 cm cotton string was dropped in a cylinder containing 500 ml
of 2% shampoo at a temperature of 45°C. As the string got wet, it separated. The time from dropping the skein till the string
isolation was considered as the wetting time.[9]
Viscosity profile
Pointer viscometer was used at room temperature to determine viscosity. The samples were placed in a sample container and
allowed to settle for 5 min, and the viscosity measured a rotating speed of 50 rpm.
Microbial control assessment
Soybean-casein Digest Agar Medium (SCDA) was used for preliminary evaluation of microorganisms. Microbial suspension was also
prepared at concentrations of 105 and 108 for strains of Candida albicans, Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeroginosa, and Staphylococcus
aureus a sample of shampoo was diluted with SCDA at a ratio of 1:10; then 1 ml of the prepared diluted solution and 9 ml of SCDA was
added into four test tubes. 0.1 ml of each microbial suspension was added individually to one of the pertinent test tubes. The test tubes
were sealed, shaken, and kept at a temperature of 37°C for 24h.[9]Microbial limits test This test was carried out based on plate count
method: 1 ml of 1:10, 1:20, 1:30, 1:40, and 1:50 of diluted licorice shampoo was added separately into five test tubes containing 9 ml of
SCDA. Then 1 ml of the mixture of each test tube was put on a plate, and added by 15 ml of nutrient-agar and melt agar then kept in an
incubator for 24 h.[9]
Antimicrobial preservative effectiveness test 20 ml of licorice shampoo and 0.1 ml of each microbial suspension were added to individual
pertinent test tubes and kept at room temperature for 7, 14, 21, 28 (and 35 for C. albicans) days. 1 ml of the contents from each tube was taken
in two sterile plates and then 15–20 ml of 40°C melt soybean-casein digest agar was added to it. After solidifying, they were kept at 37°C for 24
h.[9]
TUGAS
3. Potluri A, Shaheda SK, Rallapally N, Durrivel S, Harish G. A review on herbs used in anti-dandruff shampoo and its evaluation parameters. Research J Topical and Cosmetic
Sci. 2013;4:5–13. [Google Scholar] [Ref list]
4. Azadbakht M, Monadi T, Esmaeili Z, Chabra A, Tavakoli N. Formulation and Evaluation of Licorice Shampoo in Comparison with Commercial Shampoo. J Pharm
Bioallied Sci. 2018;10(4):208-215. doi:10.4103/JPBS.JPBS_243_17
5. Aghel N, Moghimipour E, Raies Dana A. Formulation of a herbal shampoo using total saponins of Acanthophyllum squarrosum. Iranian J Pharmaceutical Res. 2010:167–
72. [Google Scholar]
6. Mainkar AR, Jolly CI. Evaluation of commercial herbal shampoos. Int J Cosmet Sci. 2000;22:385–91. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
7. Shreve B, Thiex N, Wolf M. National forage testing association reference method: dry matter by oven drying for 3 hours at 105 C. NFTA Reference Methods. National
Forage Testing Association, Omaha, NB. 2006 [Google Scholar]
8. Draves CZ, Clarkson GR. A new method for the evaluation of wetting agents. Am Dyestuff Reptr. 1931;20:201. [Google Scholar]
9. 23rd ed. Easton: Mack Printing Company; 1995. USP XXIII, The United States Pharmacopeia. [Google Scholar]