Chapter 5 - Communication Process
Chapter 5 - Communication Process
Market segments
Ind
ivi
Nichedua
markets
l
and Figure 5-2: Levels of audience aggregation
gro
up
aud
ien
Level of audience aggregation
• individuals & groups person who have specific needs and for whom the
communication must be specifically tailored.
• Market niches Customers who have similar needs and wants and thus represent
some type of market segment that can be reached with the same basic communication
strategy
• Market segments broader classes of buyers who have similar needs and can be
reached with similar messages
• Mass communication one-way flow of information from the marketers to the
consumer
The response process
Traditional response hierarchy models
• AIDA - model was developed to represent the stages a salesperson must take a customer
through in the personal-selling process.
• Hierarchy of effects model - shown the process by which advertising works; it assumes a
consumer passes through a series of steps in sequential order from initial awareness of a
product or service to actual purchase
• Innovation adoption model - evolved from work on the diffusion of innovations. This
model represents the stages a consumer passes through in adopting a new product or service
• Information processing model – this model assumes the receiver in a persuasive
communication situation like advertising is an information processor or problem solver
Models
Stages AIDA model Hierarchy of Innovation Information
effects model adoption model processing
model
Cognitive stage Attention Awareness Awareness Presentation
Attention
Knowledge Comprehensio
n
Affective stage Interest Liking Interest Yielding
Preference
Inventory, point-of-purchase
Purchase behavior consumer panel scanner data
Implications of the traditional hierarchy
models
• The hierarchy models of communication response are useful to promotional planners
from several perspectives
• First, they delineate the series of steps potential purchasers must be taken through to
move them from unawareness of a product or service to readiness to purchase it
• Second, potential buyers may be at different stages in the hierarchy, so the advertiser will
face different sets of communication problems
• The hierarchy models can also be useful as intermediate measures of communication
effectiveness
• Communication task involves increasing the awareness level for the brand
Evaluating traditional response hierarchy
models
• Four models presented all view the response process as consisting of movement
through a sequence of three basic stages:
• The cognitive stages – represents what the receiver knows or perceives about the particular
product or brand
• The affective stages – refers to the receiver’s feelings or affect level (like or dislike) for the
particular brand
• The conative or behavioral stages – refers to the consumer’s action toward the brand:
trial, purchase, adoption, or rejection
• four models assume a similar ordering of these three stages
Topical involvement
High Low
High (learning model) (Low-involvement model)
cognitive Cognitive
Affective
Perceived
product conative
differentiatio Low Conative Figure 5-5: alternative response
(dissonance/attribution
n model) hierarchies - the three-orders model
Conative of information processing
Affective
cognitive Affective
Alternative response hierarchies
• Model of information processing has three alternative orderings based on
perceived product differentiation and product involvement
• The standard learning hierarchy
• The dissonance/attribution hierarchy
• Low-involvement model cognitive
Alternative response hierarchy
The standard learning hierarchy
• Consumer will go through the response process in the sequence depicted by the
traditional communications models
• This model consists of:
• Learn feel do sequence
• Consumer is viewed as an active participant in the communication process who
gathers information through active learning
• Standard learning hierarchy is likely when the consumer is highly involved in
the purchase process and there is much differentiation among competing brands
Alternative response hierarchy
The dissonance/attribution hierarchy
• Involve situation where consumers first behave, the develop attitudes or feelings as a result of that
behavior, and then learn or process information that supports the behavior
• This model consists
• Do feel learn
• Consumers must choose between two alternatives that are similar in quality but are complex and may
have hidden or unknown attributes
• According to this model, marketers need to recognize that in some situations, attitudes, develop after
purchase, as does learning from the mass media
• As with the standard learning model, this response hierarchy is likely to occur when the consumer is
involved in the purchase situation; it is particularly relevant for post purchase situations
Alternative response hierarchy
the low-involvement hierarchy
• Receiver is viewed as passing from cognition to behavior to attitude change
• Learn do feel sequence
• Low consumer involvement in the purchase process
• This hierarchy tend to occurs when involvement in the purchase decision is low.
• The consumer engage is passive learning and random information catching rather
than active information seeking.
• Appeals prevail in much of the advertising we see frequently purchased consumer
products
Implications of the alternative response
models
• Advertising is just one source of information consumers use in learning about products,
forming attitudes, and/or making purchase decisions.
• Consumers make a purchase decision on the basis general awareness resulting from
repetitive exposure to advertising, and attitude development occurs after purchase
• It is important that marketers examine the communication situation for their product or
service and determine which type of response process is most likely to occur
• These model can be value to marketers as they develop IMC strategies as they recognize
that advertising and other promotional tools work differently depending on the type of
product involved and the decision process sequence that consumers are likely to follow
The social consumer decision journey
• The decision journey has four (4) basic stages which is:
• Consider
• Evaluate
• Buy
• Enjoy-advocate-bond
• Consumers decisions making process as a winding journey with multiple feedback
loops rather than linear, single uniform path to purchase based on active shopping and
influenced by marketers dominated and controlled touch points such as media
advertising
The social consumer decision journey
Cognitive processing of communications:
the cognitive response approach
• These though are generally measured by having consumers write down or
verbally report their reactions to a message
• These though reflect the recipient’s cognitive processes or reactions and
help shape ultimate acceptance or rejection of the message
• Its focus has been determine the types of response evoked by an
advertising message and how these response relate to attitudes toward the
ad, brand attitudes, and purchase intentions
Cognitive responses Attitudes Purchase intent
Product/message
thoughts
Brand attitudes
Attitude toward
the
advertisement
Ad execution
thoughts
A model of cognitive response
Product/ message thoughts
• Product or message thoughts are divided into two particular types of
responses:
• Counterarguments thoughts the recipient has that are opposed to the position
taken in the message
• Support arguments thoughts that affirm the claims made in the message
Source-oriented thoughts
• A second category of cognitive responses is directed at the source of
communication
• Important type of responses is
• Source derogations negative thoughts about the spokesperson or organization
making the claims
• Source bolsters receiver who react favorably to the source generate favorable
thoughts
Ad execution thoughts
• Third category of cognitive response consists of the individual’s thought
about ad itself
• Ad execution-related thoughts its include reactions to a execution
factors such as creativity of
the ad, the quality of the visual effects,
colors and voices tones
• Attitude toward the ad represents the receivers’ feelings of
favorability or unfavorability toward the ad
The elaboration likelihood model
• Explain the process by which persuasive communications lead to persuasion by influencing
attitudes
• According to this model, the attitude formation or change process depends on the amount and
nature of elaboration
• ELM shows that elaboration likelihood is a function of two elements which is motivation and
ability
• Motivation to process the message depends on such factors as involvement, personal
relevance, and individuals’ needs and arousal levels
• Ability depends on the individual’s knowledge, intellectual capacity, and opportunity to
process the message
Persuasive
Temporary
communication attitude shift
Motivated to process:
• Issue involvement
• no yes
Relevance commitment
• Dissonance arousal
• need for cognition etc. Persuasion cue present?
• Self presentation motives
yes
Ability to process: • Demand characteristics
• Distraction • Evaluation apprehension
• Message • Source characteristics, etc.
comprehensibility
• Issue familiarity no
• Appropriate schema
• Fear arousal
yes
no The elaboration likelihood
Nature of cognitive processing
model of persuasion
(initial attitude, argument quality, etc.,)
• Favorable • Unfavorable • Neither or Retain or
though thoughts neutral regain initial
predominate predominate predominate attitude