Demand and Supply
Demand and Supply
Supply and
Demand
• In economics, explanation and prediction are based on theories. Theories are developed to explain observed phenomena in terms of a set of basic rules and assumptions.
• A model is a mathematical representation, based on economic theory, of a firm, a market, or some other entity.
Positive versus Normative Analysis
• A company must understand who its actual and potential competitors are for the various products that it sells or might sell in the future.
QS = QS(P)
The quantity that producers are willing to sell depends not only on the price
they receive but also on their production costs, including wages, interest
charges, and the costs of raw materials.
When production costs decrease, output increases no matter what the market
price happens to be. The entire supply curve thus shifts to the right.
Economists often use the phrase change in supply to refer to shifts in the
supply curve, while reserving the phrase change in the quantity supplied to
apply to movements along the supply curve.
SUPPLY AND DEMAND
QD = QD(P)
SUPPLY AND DEMAND
If the market price were held constant, we would expect to see an increase in
the quantity demanded as a result of consumers’ higher incomes. Because
this increase would occur no matter what the market price, the result would
be a shift to the right of the entire demand curve.
Equilibrium
We are assuming that at any given price, a given quantity will be produced
and sold.
This assumption makes sense only if a market is at least roughly competitive.
By this we mean that both sellers and buyers should have little market power
—i.e., little ability individually to affect the market price.
Suppose that supply were controlled by a single producer.
If the demand curve shifts in a particular way, it may be in the monopolist’s
interest to keep the quantity fixed but change the price, or to keep the price
fixed and change the quantity.
CHANGES IN MARKET EQUILIBRIUM
Over the past two decades, the wages of skilled high-income workers
have grown substantially, while the wages of unskilled low-income
workers have fallen slightly.
From 1978 to 2005, people in the top 20 percent of the income
distribution experienced an increase in their average real pretax
household income of 50 percent, while those in the bottom 20 percent
saw their average real pretax income increase by only 6 percent.
While the supply of unskilled workers—people with limited educations
—has grown substantially, the demand for them has risen only slightly.
On the other hand, while the supply of skilled workers has grown
slowly, the demand has risen dramatically, pushing wages up.
CHANGES IN MARKET EQUILIBRIUM
Case 2: Ep is 0
Here ΔQ is 0, whatever be the value of Δ P. This means that price change does not
bring in any change in quantity demanded. Such goods are essential goods.
Example LPG Gas, Medicines etc.
Case 3: Ep is positive
Here, as P increases, Q also increases. These are luxury goods like expensive cars
– Mercedes or Audi. As price goes up, rich consumers demand the good, as that
signifies a style statement or life style. Example: De-Beers Diamonds.
ELASTICITIES OF SUPPLY AND DEMAND
(2.2)
(2.3)
Elasticities of Supply
● price elasticity of supply Percentage change in quantity supplied
resulting from a 1-percent increase in price.
ELASTICITIES OF SUPPLY AND DEMAND
Because these supply and demand curves are linear, the price
elasticities will vary as we move along the curves.
SHORT-RUN VERSUS LONG-RUN ELASTICITIES
Demand
Income Elasticities
Income elasticities also differ from the short run to the long run.
For most goods and services—foods, beverages, fuel, entertainment,
etc.— the income elasticity of demand is larger in the long run than in
the short run.
For a durable good, the opposite is true. The short-run income elasticity
of demand will be much larger than the long-run elasticity.
SHORT-RUN VERSUS LONG-RUN ELASTICITIES
Demand
Demand: Q = a − bP
Supply: Q = c + dP
Step 1:
E = (P/Q)(ΔQ/ΔP)
Demand: ED = −b(P*/Q*)
Supply: ES = d(P*/Q*)
Step 2:
a = Q* + bP*
Q = a − bP + fI
UNDERSTANDING AND PREDICTING THE
EFFECTS OF CHANGING MARKET CONDITIONS
After reaching a level of about $1.00 per pound in 1980, the price
of copper fell sharply to about 60 cents per pound in 1986.
Worldwide recessions in 1980 and 1982 contributed to the decline
of copper prices.
Why did the price increase sharply in 2005–2007? First, the
demand for copper from China and other Asian countries began
increasing dramatically. Second, because prices had dropped so
much from 1996 through 2003, producers closed unprofitable
mines and cut production.
What would a decline in demand do to the price of copper? To find
out, we can use linear supply and demand curves.
UNDERSTANDING AND PREDICTING THE
EFFECTS OF CHANGING MARKET CONDITIONS
Copper prices are shown in both nominal (no adjustment for inflation) and real
(inflation-adjusted) terms. In real terms, copper prices declined steeply from the
early 1970s through the mid-1980s as demand fell. In 1988–1990, copper prices
rose in response to supply disruptions caused by strikes in Peru and Canada but
later fell after the strikes ended. Prices declined during the 1996–2002 period but
then increased sharply during 2005–2007.
UNDERSTANDING AND PREDICTING THE
EFFECTS OF CHANGING MARKET CONDITIONS
Short-Run Long-Run
World Demand: -0.05 -0.40
(b)
EFFECTS OF GOVERNMENT INTERVENTION—
PRICE CONTROLS
If price is regulated to be no
higher than Pmax, the quantity
supplied falls to Q1, the
quantity demanded increases
to Q2, and a shortage
develops.
EFFECTS OF GOVERNMENT INTERVENTION—
PRICE CONTROLS
The (free-market) wholesale price of natural gas was $6.40 per mcf
(thousand cubic feet);
Production and consumption of gas were 23 Tcf (trillion cubic feet);
The average price of crude oil (which affects the supply and demand for
natural gas) was about $50 per barrel.
Supply: Q = 15.90 + 0.72PG + 0.05PO
Demand: Q = -10.35 - 0.18PG + 0.69PO
Substitute $3.00 for PG in both the supply and demand equations
(keeping the price of oil, PO, fixed at $50).
You should find that the supply equation gives a quantity supplied of
20.6 Tcf and the demand equation a quantity demanded of 23.6 Tcf.
Therefore, these price controls would create an excess demand of
23.6 − 20.6 = 3.0 Tcf.