MSK MRI Pulse Sequences
MSK MRI Pulse Sequences
+
~
of energy by nuclei at a specific
resonance (Larmor) frequency
• Signals used to generate images arise
H
from hydrogen nuclei (protons) mainly
in water and fat molecules The hydrogen proton (top), “spins” around its axis, resulting
in a magnetic moment. Proton spins behave similar to “bar
• Each proton spins about an axis, magnets” with a north and a south pole.
resulting in a magnetic moment Outside the magnetic field of an MRI unit, the protons in the
human body spin with their axes randomly aligned (bottom).
longitudinal
• A radiofrequency (RF) pulsed is magnetization
axis
y-
Spin Echo (SE) Pulse Sequences
y
• Transverse relaxation or T2 relaxation
refers to the tendency of proton spins
to dephase (i.e., become incoherent, x Time
pointing in different directions in the
transverse plane) After the 90o excitation pulse is turned off,
the proton spins in the transverse (xy) plane
• T2 relaxation decreases the Signal begin to dephase, which reduces the
induced signal in the RF-coil. The rates of
transverse magnetization vector and dephasing are different for different tissues,
which can be depicted on the T 2 relaxation
consequently the MR signal used for curves (below). In this example, the T 2 of
tissue A (e.g., fat) is shorter than the T 2 of
image production tissue B (e.g., fluid).
37%
• T2 is defined as the time by which tissue B
transverse magnetization is T2 T2
tissue A
1800 refocusing
900
RF pulse
excitation Time
RF pulse Spin Echo:
signal/emitted energy can be
detected by receiver coil
longitudinal magnetization reaches 63% of rates depending on the tissue, which can be depicted
on a T1 curve (below). In this example, the T 1 of tissue
T1-weighted transverse MR image of ankle (left) appears very similar to T 2-weighted image
(center) without fat suppression. Small amounts of fluid can be seen on both images, dark
on T1-weighted image and bright on T2-weighted image (arrows). With fat suppression
(right) small amounts of fluid become more conspicuous on T 2-weighted image.
Spin Echo (SE) Pulse Sequences
• Proton density (PD) weighted images PD-weighted sagittal
MR image of knee
(top) shows tear of
minimize T1 and T2 characteristics of tissues posterior horn of
medial meniscus
by maximizing longitudinal recovery (long TR) contacting tibial
articular surface
and minimizing transverse decay (short TE) (arrow). This tear is
more conspicuous
• Tissues with more protons have higher signal compared with fat-
saturated T2-weighted
Fat-saturated PD-weighted sagittal MR image of knee (left) with high-signal-intensity fluid nicely
depicts tear of posterior horn of medial meniscus (arrow). On corresponding T 1-weighted image
(right), low-signal-intensity fluid in joint is difficult to distinguish from meniscus, giving appearance
of intact inner half of posterior horn.
Spin Echo (SE) Pulse Sequences
• “Intermediate-weighted” pulse
sequences have TE values in the
range of 30-60 ms (between true * *
preferred by many radiologists for (arrow) of cartilage along lateral femoral condyle. Inset (top right) shows layers depicted
as blue (cartilage), red (area of delamination) and yellow (subchondral bone plate).
meniscal evaluation Intermediate-weighted image obtained two weeks later (bottom) shows complete
detachment of cartilage (arrow).
Spin Echo (SE) Pulse Sequences
T1 T2 PD
TR Short Long Long
• Conventional (“single-echo”) SE
TE Short Long Short
pulse sequences, which use a
single 180o refocusing pulse, are TR
lengthy and therefore seldomly RF pulse
used in today’s MSK MRI 90o 180o
½ TE for PD
180o
protocols ½ TE for T2
pulse to produce PD- (short TE) (TEs of 12 ms and 110 ms, respectively).
contrast characteristics, blurring, motion and other intermediate-weighted FSE dataset shows
fabellofibular ligament (short orange arrows) and
have been touted as superior to 3D gradient- degeneration, from tiny surface defects (thin orange arrow, top) to full-
thickness cartilage loss (thick orange arrow, bottom). While 3D FSE
echo sequences (described later) techniques have not yet replaced standard 2D FSE sequences, they
show great promise for whole-organ evaluation of different joints, and
can depict subchondral bone marrow abnormalities better than
gradient-echo sequences.
Gradient Echo (GRE) Pulse Sequences
Conventional spin echo sequence
TR
• Gradient Echo (GRE) pulse sequences
differ from SE sequences: RF pulse 90o 180o 90o
• GRE pulse sequences begin with a T2 relaxation curve
TE
Gradient Echo (GRE) Pulse Sequences
• The smaller flip angles used in
GRE sequences lead to faster
recovery of longitudinal
magnetization, shorter TR, and
faster acquisition; “new” types of
tissue contrast can also be
obtained Fat-suppressed proton-density-weighted MR image of shoulder (left) shows infiltrative mass (arrow) in
glenohumeral joint containing regions of low signal intensity. Gradient-echo MR image (right) shows
• Since GRE pulse sequences are increased prominence of low-signal intensity regions (“blooming”) resulting from hemosiderin in this
patient with pigmented villonodular synovitis.
not efficient at reducing magnetic
inhomogeneity, susceptibility
artifacts can occur that can
degrade image quality or be used
to detect hemorrhage or
mineralization T1-weighted (left) and T2-STIR (center) coronal MR images of wrist show scaphoid waist
fracture (arrow). Gradient-echo image (right) fails to show fracture due to susceptibility
effects of trabeculae.
Gradient Echo (GRE) Pulse Sequences
• In addition to “basic” GRE pulse sequences, a large
Gradient echo
number of GRE variants have been developed, many of pulse sequence
which are used in MSK MR imaging variants
• While a comprehensive analysis of these various (simplified)
sequences is beyond the scope of this presentation, on
a basic level, GRE sequences can be categorized
Coherent: Spoiled:
based on whether transverse magnetization is
transverse transverse
preserved (coherent GRE sequences) or disrupted magnetization magnetization
(spoiled GRE sequences) preserved disrupted
• Additional GRE sequences, such as ultra-short TE
imaging, are being investigated as novel methods of
evaluating tissues with short T2-relaxation times such as
tendons, ligaments, menisci and cortical bone
Gradient Echo (GRE) Pulse Sequences
TR (extremely short)
• With coherent GRE sequences,
transverse magnetization is refocused RF pulse
to contribute to a steady state in which RF2
αo
RF3
αo
RF4
αo
longitudinal and transverse
magnetization is constant from one TR Signal
cycle to the next FID SE FID SE FID
of RF2 of RF1 of RF3 of RF2 of RF4
• Once equilibrium is reached, two types TE – FID
of signals are produced: (postexcitation)
sensitive to motion; T2-weighted pre- arrow) of patella and displaced cartilage fragment
(long arrow). Such sequences have advantage of
excitation steady-state sequences have good fluid-to-tissue contrast and have been studied
for their ability to depict articular cartilage, as well
been used for MR myelography and as labral tears during MR arthrography, but are not
ideal for assessing adjacent subchondral bone.
from long imaging times and suboptimal image of ankle shows hyperintense
articular cartilage (long arrow). Cysts
• Adjacent joint fluid is of low signal, contrast into midcarpal joint through
torn scapholunate ligament (circle).
matter contrast in the cord, but can have decays shows bright fluid (long
arrow) and articular cartilage
opposed in phase
Fat
phase
Gradient Echo (GRE) Pulse Sequences
TE 0 1.1 2.2 3.3 4.4 5.5 6.6ms • With an echo time (TE) at
which the fat and water
signals are in phase, the
1.5T signals add constructively;
Water
when they are out of phase,
the signals cancel
opposed in phase “opposed
Fat
phase phase"
of diffusion-weighted imaging encoding gradient. The collected gradient echoes are sorted in a meander-shape into k-space
allowing acquisition of an entire MR image after a single excitation.
Diffusion-Weighted Imaging
• Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI)
evaluates the random motion of water
molecules and allows distinction of
unrestricted diffusion from restricted
diffusion of water protons
• Areas with higher cellularity (e.g., Tissues with lower
cellularity (top) allow for
Increasing b values
• Strength of the applied tumor (thick arrow). The viable
tumor remains hyperintense due to
diffusion weighting, indicated * restricted diffusion on DWI. DW
sequences are often applied in
by its “b-value” conjunction with apparent diffusion
coefficient (ADC) mapping techniques
(not shown); tissues with restricted
• MSK applications include diffusion appear dark on ADC maps,
and tissues with unrestricted
evaluation of bone malignancy and diffusion appear bright.
Water
lower Larmor frequency than protons x x
in water (“chemical shift”) Fat
Excitation
y
• Using an RF pulse specific for the fat RF pulse
specific for fat “Spoiler” gradient fat
resonance frequency and a transverse magnetization
subsequent dephasing gradient, the signal is lost
x
Fat
y
Methods of Suppressing Fat Signal
Note: Vendors also offer hybrid fat-suppression
sequences which combine a chemical-shift
selective pulse with inversion delay; these
• The advantages of CHESS include include SPECIAL (GE), SPIR (Philips) and SPAIR
(Philips and Siemens)
its ability to be used with any T1-weighted transverse image through
imaging sequence, and with T1- axilla shows two hyperintense lesions
(thin and thick arrows). With chemical-
shortening contrast agents; it is shift selective fat suppression, anterior
lesion (thin arrow) looses signal,
relatively fast, and yields relatively indicating lipoma. Posterior lesion (thick
arrow) remains hyperintense, indicating
high SNR hematoma.
• However, it is sensitive to
magnetic field inhomogeneities Patient with subcutaneous
without fat suppression prior to i.v. (center image) and following (right) intravenous Gd administration shows vivid enhancement of mass, indicating
solid vascular tissue. Glomus tumor was diagnosed following resection.
Gd administration can be
subtracted from a similar image
obtained following Gd
administration to render
enhancement more conspicuous;
this can be beneficial if fat- * *
suppression is limited (e.g., due to
metal susceptibility artifact) T1-weighted transverse MR image of knee (left) shows heterogeneous soft tissue sarcoma with high- and low-
signal intensity components. Following intravenous administration of Gd-contrast agent (center image), portions
of mass enhance (*), indicating vascularity. Enhancing solid components can be rendered more conspicuous by
subtracting non-enhanced image from enhanced image (right).
Contrast-Enhanced MR Imaging
• When diluted and injected into
joints, Gd can help to delineate *
tears of the glenoid and acetabular
labrum as well as tears of small
ligaments (MR-arthrography)
• Fat-suppressed T1-weighted T2-weighted coronal oblique MR image of shoulder shows cyst (*) in suprascapular notch. No
labral tear is identified. Fat-suppressed T 1-weighted image obtained following intra-articular
images are typically acquired injection of dilute gadolinium shows superior labral tear (arrow).
following intra-articular Gd
administration, but other
sequences including proton- PD-weighted axial-oblique MR image of hip
following intra-articular injection of dilute
density and intermediate-weighted gadolinium-chelate shows anterior labral tear
(arrow).
sequences with or without fat
suppression can be obtained
Quantitative Compositional Cartilage Imaging
• Cartilage consists predominantly of interstitial
water (60-80% by weight), as well as collagen
(15-20%) and proteoglycans with attached
glycosaminoglycans (10%)
• In addition to the various pulse sequences
previously described that can assess the
morphology of cartilage, special sequences can
be used to quantitatively assess the biochemical
composition of cartilage before morphologic
changes are appreciated
• T2-mapping (briefly described on the next slide)
is the most common of these sequences; other
methods include dGEMRIC, T1r-imaging,
sodium imaging and DWI T2-mapping of articular cartilage in the knee with a pulse sequence
that acquires images with different echo times TE (top right graph).
Quantitative Compositional Cartilage Imaging
• The T2 relaxation time of cartilage is a
function of its water content and collagen
• T2 values of cartilage can be obtained using a
pulse sequence with multiple echoes at
different TEs; software can then be used to
create color-coded maps for assessment
• Superficial cartilage layers have higher water
content and longer T2 relaxation times,
whereas deeper layers have lower water
content and shorter T2 relaxation times T2-mapping of patellofemoral articular cartilage. Pulse sequence
acquires images at multiple different TEs (top row). Pixel-by-pixel T 2
• Cartilage degeneration generally results in calculations are displayed on color-coded map. Note higher T 2-
values in superficial cartilage layer (green) compared to lower T 2-
increased water content and increased T2 values in deeper cartilage layer (orange).
relaxation times
MRI Artifacts
• A variety of image artifacts can be
encountered on MSK MRI exams
which can degrade image quality
or even simulate lesions
• Some artifacts are dependent on
the pulse sequence used; a few Proton density-weighted sagittal MR image of knee (left) shows motion artifact simulating meniscal
such artifacts, including motion tear (arrow). Fat-suppressed proton density-weighted image from the same scan (right) shows no tear.
• Avoid GRE sequences (which are prone to image of shoulder (arrows, left) than on FSE image (right).
T2-weighted (often with fat suppression) Detection of fluid and edema (and therefore abnormalities in a variety of tissues)
Proton-density-weighted Identifying abnormal signal in normally signal-poor structures (e.g., fibrocartilage); conspicuity of fluid is
increased with fat suppression; typically sequence of choice for meniscal imaging
In-and-opposed-phase Detection of microscopic fat (e.g., to distinguish red marrow from marrow infiltrated by tumor)
Diffusion-weighted Determining restriction of diffusion due to cellularity (e.g., bone and soft-tissue tumors, follow-up of
tumors post-therapy, vertebral fractures and infection)
Fat-suppression (e.g., CHESS, STIR, water excitation, Dixon Improving visibility of lesions on PD-, T 2- and contrast-enhanced T1-weighted images, evaluating fat in soft-
techniques) tissue lesions, methemoglobin; STIR and Dixon techniques best with hardware
Contrast-enhanced T1-weighted Intravascular Gd injection: detecting vascular tissue (e.g., inflammation, tumor)
Intra-articular Gd injection: delineating small intra-articular structures (e.g., labrum, ligaments) and
associated abnormalities
Quantitative compositional cartilage imaging (e.g., T 2-mapping, Quantitative assessment of biochemical composition of cartilage
dGEMRIC, T1r-imaging, sodium imaging)
Suggested Readings
• Berger A. Magnetic resonance imaging. BMJ 2002; 324:35.
• Bitar R et al. MR pulse sequences: what every radiologist wants to know but is afraid to ask. Radiographics. 2006; 265:13-37
• Chavhan GB. Appropriate selection of MRI sequences for common scenarios in clinical practice. Pediatr Radiol 2016; 46:740-747
• Chavhan GB et al. Steady-state MR imaging sequences: physics, classification, and clinical applications. RadioGraphics 2008; 28:1147-1160
• Chen et al. Cartilage morphology at 3.0T: assessment of three-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging techniques. J Magn Reson Imaging 2010; 32:173-183
• Crema et al. Articular cartilage in the knee: current MR imaging techniques and applications in clinical practice and research. RadioGraphics 2011; 31:37-62
• Del Grande F et al. Fat-suppression techniques for 3-T MR imaging of the musculoskeletal system. RadioGraphics 2014; 34:217-233
• Del Grande F et al. Bone marrow lesions: A systematic diagnostic approach. Indian J Radiol Imaging. 2014 Jul-Sep; 24(3): 279–287.
• Elster AD. Gradient-echo MR imaging: techniques and acronyms. Radiology 1993; 186:1-8
• Gold et al. Recent advances in MRI of articular cartilage. AJR 2009; 193:628-638
• Hargreaves BA. Rapid gradient-echo imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 2012; 36:1300-1313
• Hesper T et al. T2* mapping for articular cartilage assessment: principles, current applications, and future prospects. Skeletal Radiol 2014; 43:1429-1445.
• Huda W. (2016) Review of radiologic physics. LWW.
• Link TM. MR imaging in osteoarthritis: hardware, coils, and sequences. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 2010; 18:95-110
• Morelli JN et al. An Image-based Approach to Understanding the Physics of MR Artifacts. Radiographics. 2011 31:849-66
• Pezeshk P et al. Role of chemical shift and Dixon based techniques in musculoskeletal MR imaging. Eur J Radiol 2017; 94:93-100.
• Pooley RA. AAPM/RSNA physics tutorial for residents: fundamental physics of MR imaging. Radiographics 2005; 25:1087-99.
• Richardson ML et al. Some new angles on the magic angle: what MSK radiologists know and don’t know about this phenomenon. Skeletal Radiol 2018; 47:1673-1681
• Schild HH. (1994) MRI made easy (…well almost). Berlex Laboratories.
• Shakoor D et al. Diagnosis of knee meniscal injuries by using three-dimensional MRI: a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic performance. Radiology
2019; 290:435-445
• Singh DR et al. Artifacts in musculoskeletal MR imaging. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 2014; 18:12-22
• Tanitame N et al. Clinical utility of optimized three-dimensional T1-, T2-, and T2*-weighted sequences in spinal magnetic resonance imaging. Jpn J Radiol 2017;
35:135-144
• We also suggest the web site www.mriquestions.com by Allen D. Elster (© 2018) as a comprehensive but easily digestible resource for material pertaining to general
MRI physics.