Cengage Eco Dev Chapter 8 - Savings and The Financial System - 32804569

Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 50

Economic Development in Asia

Chapter 7 – Savings and the Financial System


Introduction to Savings
• Savings are a key variable in determining economic
growth.

• Total savings are the sum of government, business, and


private savings.

• In developing countries, most savings are accumulated


by private households and the business sector.

• Hence, research has been concentrated on the study of


private/household savings.
Some Savings Models
• Keynesian Model
• Income Smoothing Models: The Permanent
Income/Lifecycle Hypothesis
Determinants of Savings

• Level of interest rates


• Role of government
• Growth in income
• Terms of trade
• Population age structure
• Level of income
• Degree of financial liberalization and stability
Level of Savings

• Developing countries such as South Asia and Latin


America currently save up to approximately 20 –25% of
GDP.

• Savings in East Asia are the highest, and register around


35% in 2000 (Figure 7.1).

• Higgins (1998) predicts after 2010, savings in East Asia


would fall because of greying population structure.
Banking and Financial System
• Banking systems in Asia evolved from mainly British
or Japanese colonial models.

• Financial systems are dominated by commercial


banks.

• For most of the postwar period, financial systems


were characterized by substantial financial repression.
Financial Repression

• High reserve requirements.

• Interest rate controls.

• Compulsory credit allocations to different sectors.

• Lack of loan scrutiny.

• High profit and low efficiency as a result of lack of


competition.
Financial Repression
• This kind of banking system evolved when
governments played a strong role in mobilization
and allocation of credit.

• Specialized banks were often used to further


allocate credit to key sectors.

• Real interest rates were often very low to help out


key sectors and as a result, levels of overall
saving/investment were discouraged.
Financial Repression
• The miracle economies were
able to grow rapidly despite
financial repression because
the rest of the economy was
more open and export
oriented.

• Nevertheless, financial
repression still exerted a drag
on growth and efficiency.

• Financial repression was a


bigger handicap in South Asia
where it combined with other
policies like import substitution
to create inefficiency.
Financial Liberalization
• Ideally, financial liberalization
removes all of the restrictions to
the workings of markets created by
repression.

• This includes setting of interest


rates at market levels, removing
loan allocations and cutting down
the tax on the banking system from
high reserve requirements.

• The resulting financial system


functions efficiently.
Experience in Asia (before)
• In the 1960s and 1970s,
commercial banks were
tightly controlled by
governments.

• Banks and development


finance institutions were
the main financial
intermediaries.

• Private equity and bond


markets were very thin.
Experience in Asia (before)

• Government controlled interest rates and banks


were required to hold government securities.

• Loan allocations were made and administered


through banks and development financial
institutions (DFIs).
Experience in Asia (after)
• In the 1980s and 1990s,
some financial
liberalization took place in
East and Southeast Asia.

• Greater competition were


allowed as foreign banks
granted licenses and
banks were privatized.

• Interest rates were


deregulated to some
extent.
• Some prudential
regulations introduced
including auditing and
oversight functions.
Experience in Asia (after)
• In South Asia the pace of reforms was slower (Table
7.2).

• Despite liberalization, the banking culture in Asia


did not change that much in terms of how loans
were approved and the reliance on the government
for support.

• Competition increased but government role in


approving entry was still strong.
Measures of Financial
Repression
• The ratio of money supply to GDP is a
good indication of financial repression.

• In East and Southeast Asia, this ratio


increased dramatically from 1970 to the
end of the century (Table 7.3).

• Malaysia and Thailand are noteworthy


examples.

• Slower progress in some other


economies.
Measures of Financial
Repression
• Hong Kong and Singapore
liberalized earlier. The financial
system in Korea and Taiwan
remained somewhat more closed.

• In South Asia, liberalization took


place in recent years but the
M2/GDP ratio remained low in
most cases.

• In the Philippines, banks


liberalized in 1980s and in
Indonesia the ratio increased from
a low level in the early period as
significant banking reform took
place.
Comparison with Other Regions
• Liberalization is generally
costly to the government.

• It loses revenue from


having to pay low interest
rates on debt and by taxing
banks through high reserve
requirements when there is
financial repression.

• Latin America had problems


with inflation and large
government deficits which
made it difficult to finance
liberalization.
Risks of Liberalizing in Asia

• When there is a boom, capital inflows make it difficult


to control inflation and the pace of economic growth.

• This is because it is hard to sterilize inflows and to


maintain exchange rate at competitive levels.

• Loan supervision was also generally weak in Asia


prior to the financial crisis.
Risks of Liberalizing in Asia

• Debt to equity ratios were also very high, creating a risky


and volatile situation (see Table 7.4).
• The amount of short term debt was also high (Table 7.5).
Risks of Liberalizing in Asia

• Institutional practices that were in


force before liberalization did not
change. i.e. - lack of competition,
• - directed lending,
• - the presence of moral
hazard,
• - poor loan approval system
• still prevailed after
“liberalization”.

• Refer Supplementary Article 7a.


Financial Crisis of 1997
• As the crisis unfolded,
weaknesses in the 5 crisis
affected countries was
exacerbated by currency
depreciation, reduced lending
opportunities and build up of Non-
Performing Loans (NPLs).

• Large short term external debt.

• Inability or lack of will to address


weaknesses already pointed out
above.
Financial Crisis of 1997
• Needed to introduce better process to identify worthy
borrowers;

• Further deregulate financial transactions and


introduce more competition;

• Introduce better prudential regulations;

• Continue to privatize state banks;

• Improve lender recourse;


Financial Crisis of 1997
• Improve accounting and auditing procedures;

• There was also a need to develop markets for new


financial assets including hedging and to reduce
restrictions on entry into banking system both
domestically and for foreign banks.
Mechanisms for dealing with the
Aftermath of the Financial Crisis
• Formation of Asset Management Companies (AMCs)
in crisis affected countries.

• Closing, merging and recapitalization of bankrupt


banks and other financial institutions.

• Restructure corporate debt to help companies get


back on their feet.
Progress in Financial
Restructuring

• NPLs have fallen since 1998.

• Banks are now stronger and in a better financial


position.

• Korea and Malaysia have made the best progress –


less so in Indonesia, Thailand and the Philippines.
Progress in Financial
Restructuring
• Generally less progress in corporate restructuring has
been made than in banking.

• Bank credit has expanded in Korea and Malaysia but it


was still below pre-crisis levels in other countries at end of
2002.
Informal Finance
• In many developing countries, there are significant
sectors of the population that are unable to obtain credit
from banks and other financial institutions in the private
sector.

• Informal financial institutions serve the financial needs of


these people.
Informal Finance
• Efforts to integrate the formal and informal sectors have
moved forward slowly.

• The lack of availability of formal finance has been a


major deterrent to lending to the poor for many years.
Informal Finance
•Inability to borrow from banks in the formal sector
because:
• Access is limited for squatters and in some rural areas.
• Banks lend for investment and not for consumption.
• Transactions costs to assess loans to the poor are high.
Informal Finance

•Inability to borrow from banks in the


formal sector because:
• Banks lack information about credit
worthiness of poor borrowers.

• Poor have no assets to serve as


collateral.

• Banks believe potential poor


borrowers are unable to repay loans at
commercial rates of interest.
Informal Finance
• To address this shortfall in borrowing options, a
number of different institutions and schemes have
been developed.

• Group finance – Rotating saving and credit


associations (Roscas) are found in many countries
and have a long history.
Forms of Informal Finance -
Roscas
• Roscas deal with the problems mentioned above by
organizing people who pool resources. Since they know
each other and the rate of interest is set by a bidding
scheme among the members.

• Most Roscas exclude women.

• Default is discouraged by pressure from other members


of the group.
Forms of Informal Finance -
Others
• Next is money lenders, landlords and pawnshops.

• In these forms of lending, there is one lender (better


off) and many (poorer) borrowers.

• Rates of interest are higher than the formal market.


Forms of Informal Finance –
Others (Money Lender)

• Conventional wisdom is that the rates of interest charged


are usurious and money lenders are blood sucking
scoundrels preying on the poor.

• Recent evidence suggests that there is some competition


among lenders and rates charged by money lenders are
not unusually high given the risks and the costs of
administration of a number of small loans.
Forms of Informal Finance –
Others (Landlords)
• Landlords often make loans to tenants to buy seeds and
fertilizer or tide them over when the harvest is bad.

• Sometimes the tenant gets so much in debt that he is


never able to save.

• This situation accentuates the problems of agriculture


where risks are high since harvest yields depend to a
considerable extent on the vagaries of the weather.
Forms of Informal Finance –
Others (NGOs)
• Non-government organizations (NGOs) are informal
financial institutions sponsored by outside interests that
mobilize resources.

• The Grameen Bank of Bangladesh is a very famous


NGO. It has been copied in a number of other
countries.

• Some NGOs, like the Grameen Bank, may later be


incorporated into the formal sector.
Forms of Informal Finance –
Others (NGOs)
• By working in a cooperative type environment, NGOs
enforcement and monitoring costs are minimized.

• Risk is shared within the groups that are formed within


the NGO.

• NGOs like the Grameen Bank have many characteristics


in common with Roscas.
• Refer Supplementary Article 7b.
Informal Finance
• The experience of the Grameen Bank, NGOs and
Roscas demonstrates that access to credit is the
major problem for the poor and not the lack of ability or
incentive to repay.

• However, attempts to extend such schemes to larger


and more diverse groups have run into enforcement
and principle/agent problems.
Informal Finance
• The difficulties in establishing a credit rating system for
finance as well as enforcement of contracts is part of
the principle-agent problem.

• This is discussed further when we deal with moral


hazard and asymmetric information in more depth in
Chapter 13.
Informal Finance
• How large is the informal sector? It is
shrinking as financial liberalization
takes place but it is still extensive.

• Household borrowing in the rural


sector is still largely from the informal
sector – over 50% in most countries
(see Table 7.6).

• The proportion of household debt


owed to the informal sector is
similarly high, although not as high in
the urban sector.
Informal Finance & Monetary
Policy
• The main impact of monetary policy on
informal finance and on the poor in general
is through the inflation tax.

• Assets of the poor are in goods and cash,


and they depreciate rapidly with inflation.

• Therefore, to help the poor who have to


make use of money lenders and other
informal financial markets, a stable price
level should be the major aim of monetary
policy.
Global Crisis of 2008 and 2009

• Chapter 3 examined the impact of the global financial


crisis on income and employment in Asian economies.

• The real impact of lower export demand and the outflow


of financial capital from the Asian region were explored

• Many reforms that were suggested following the 1997


Asian financial crisis had been adopted and bank
balance sheets were in better shape.
Global Crisis of 2008 and 2009

• The size and incidence of nonperforming loans (NPLs)


had also been reduced.
• The practice of short term overseas borrowing to
refinance longer term local projects at higher rates was
also curtailed.
• Exchange rates, while still loosely tied to the US dollar
were also more flexible than before the 1997 financial
crisis.
• Recovery from the global crisis is expected in the second
half of 2009 and in 2010
Summary
• Introduction to savings and its determinants.
• An understanding of the financial system in Asia, and
financial repression during 1960s-70s.
• Process of financial liberalization in Asia.
• Importance of informal finance.

You might also like