CH 10 Visual Interpretation
CH 10 Visual Interpretation
• Dangles
• Spurious Polygons
On-screen digitizing
• Not inherently difficult
• Requires consistency and attention to
detail
• Can be challenging
– Edges can be difficult to identify
– Shadows
– Low image contrast
Accuracy Assessment
• Procedures well established to evaluate the
accuracy of interpretation
– For maps with polygons of specific types, an overall
map accuracy and individual class accuracies can be
determined
• Requires a set of reference data points that
have known characteristics
– Ideally should be random
– That may miss some categories, so, often random
selection combined with collecting across all classes
and across the entire study area
Accuracy Assessment
• Should keep field collected data for input
separate from, field data used for accuracy
assessment
• Assessment is a table called the error
matrix
– Each reference point and its matching map
label are compared
The kappa statistic
• There are so many values in the error
matrix that it becomes confusing to
people.
– Want a single number that encapsulates the
significance of the error matrix.
– This is the kappa (κ) statistic
• Difference between the observed agreement
reported by the diagonal and the agreement that
might be due solely to chance
The kappa statistic
• Kappa is estimated by k hat