Module 4 - Business Forecasting
Module 4 - Business Forecasting
• Subjective methods
• Seat-of-the pants methods, intuition, experience
8) Planning
promotion. the methods of distribution and
7
FORECASTING Vs
PREDICTION
FORECASTING
Forecasting generally refers to the scientific methodology that
often uses past data along with some well-defined
assumptions or ‗model‘ to come up with a ―forecast‖ of future
demand.
8
FORECASTING Vs
PREDICTION
PREDICTION
A Prediction is a SUBJECTIVE estimate made
by an individual by using his intuitive ‗hunch‘
which may in fact come out true.
QUANTITATIVE
METHODS
Quantitative forecasting methods can be used when
(1) past information about the variable being
forecast is available,
(2) the information can be quantified, and
SEASONAL
• These VARIATIONS
are periodic patterns in a time series that
complete themselves within a calendar year or less
and are repeated on a regular basis.
Demand = T × S × C ×
R
– Additive
Demand = T + S + C +
R
– Combinations are possible
Measures of Forecast Accuracy (1
of 5)
• Compare forecasted values with actual values
– See how well one model works
– To compare models
• Measure of accuracy
– Mean absolute deviation (MAD):
MAD
forecast error
n
Measures of Forecast Accuracy (2
of 5)
TABLE 5.1 Computing the Mean Absolute Deviation (MAD)
ACTUAL ABSOLUTE VALUE OF
SALES OF WIRELESS ERRORS (DEVIATION),
MONTH SPEAKERS FORECAST SALES (ACTUAL − FORECAST)
1 110 — —
2 100 110 |100 − 110| = 10
3 120 100 |120 − 100| = 20
4 140 120 |140 − 120| = 20
5 170 140 |170 − 140| = 30
6 150 170 |150 − 170| = 20
7 160 150 |160 − 150| = 10
8 190 160 |190 − 160| = 30
9 200 190 |200 − 190| = 10
10 190 200 |190 − 200| = 10
11 — 190 —
Sum of |errors| = 160
MAD = 160÷9 = 17.8
Measures of Forecast Accuracy (3
of 5)
TABLE 5.1 Computing the Mean Absolute Deviation (MAD)
ACTUAL ABSOLUTE VALUE OF
SALES OF WIRELESS ERRORS (DEVIATION),
MONTH SPEAKERS FORECAST SALES (ACTUAL − FORECAST)
1 110 —
2 100 110
3 120 100 • Forecast based on
4 140 120 naïve model
5 170 140
6 150 170 • No attempt to adjust
7 160 150 for time series
8 190 160 components
9 200 190
10 190 200
11 — 190
Measures of Forecast Accuracy (4 of
MAD
forecast error
160
17.8
5) )
n
ACTUAL ABSOLUTE VALUE OF
TABLE SALES
5.1 Computing
OF WIRELESS the Mean AbsoluteERRORS
Deviation (MAD
(DEVIATION),
MONTH SPEAKERS FORECAST SALES (ACTUAL − FORECAST)
1 110 9 — —
2 100 110 |100 − 110| = 10
3 120 100 |120 − 100| = 20
4 140 120 |140 − 120| = 20
5 170 140 |170 − 140| = 30
6 150 170 |150 − 170| = 20
7 160 150 |160 − 150| = 10
8 190 160 |190 − 160| = 30
9 200 190 |200 − 190| = 10
10 190 200 |190 − 200| = 10
11 — 190 —
Sum of |errors| = 160
MAD = 160÷9 = 17.8
Measures of Forecast Accuracy (5
of 5)
• Other common measures
– Mean squared error
(MSE)
MSE (error)2
n
– Mean absolute percent error (MAPE)
error
actual
MAPE n 100%
Ft Yt Yt 1 ... Yt
1 n
n 1
where
Ft+1 = forecast for time period t + 1
Yt = actual value in time period t
n = number of
periods to average
Wallace Garden Supply (1 of
4)
• Wallace Garden Supply wants to forecast demand for its
Storage Shed
• Collected data for the past year
• Use a three-month moving average (n = 3)
Wallace Garden Supply (2 of
4)
TABLE 5.2 Wallace Garden Supply Shed Sales
MONTH ACTUAL SHED SALES 3-MONTH MOVING AVERAGE
January 10
February 12
March 13
April 16 (10 + 12 + 13)÷3 = 11.67
May 19 (12 + 13 + 16)÷3 = 13.67
June 23 (13 + 16 + 19)÷3 = 16.00
where
n 1
w
wi = weight for the ith
observation
Wallace Garden Supply (3 of
4)
• Use a 3-month weighted moving average model to
forecast demand
• Weighting scheme
3 Last month
2 2 months ago
1 3 months ago
3 × Sales last + 2 × Sales 2 months ago + 1 × Sales 3 months ago
month
6
Sum of the weights
Wallace Garden Supply (4 of
4)
TABLE 5.3 Weighted Moving Average Forecast for Wallace Garden Supply
MONTH ACTUAL SHED SALES 3-MONTH WEIGHTED MOVING AVERAGE
January 10
February 12
March 13
April 16 [(3 × 13) + (2 × 12) + (10)]÷6 = 12.17
May 19 [(3 × 16) + (2 × 13) + (12)]÷6 = 14.33
June 23 [(3 × 19) + (2 × 16) + (13)]÷6 = 17.00
Best choice
Using Software (1 of
7)
PROGRAM 5.1A Selecting the Forecasting Model in
Wallace Garden Supply Problem
Using Software (2 of
7)
PROGRAM 5.1B Initializing Excel QM Spreadsheet for
Wallace Garden Supply Problem
Using Software (3 of
7)
PROGRAM 5.1C Excel QM Output for Wallace Garden
Supply Problem
Using Software (4 of
7)
PROGRAM 5.2A Selecting Time-Series Analysis in QM for
Windows in the Forecasting Module
Using Software (5 of
7)
PROGRAM 5.2B Entering Data for Port of Baltimore
Example in QM for Windows
Using Software (6 of
7)
PROGRAM 5.2C Selecting the Model and Entering Data
for Port of Baltimore Example in QM for Windows
Using Software (7 of
7)
PROGRAM 5.2D Output for Port of Baltimore Example in
QM for Windows
Trend Projections (1 of
2)
• Fits a trend line to a series of historical data points
• Projected into the future for medium- to long-range
forecasts
• Trend equations can be developed based on exponential
or quadratic models
• Linear model developed using regression analysis is
simplest
Trend Projections (2 of
2)
• Mathematical formula
Y ˆ b 0 b1 X
where
Ŷ = predicted
value
b0 = intercept
b1 = slope of the
line
X = time period
(i.e., X = 1, 2, 3, …, n)
Midwestern Manufacturing (1 of
4)
• Based on least squares regression, the forecast equation is
Yˆ 56.71 10.54X