Philippine National

.A Research Center for Teacher

{f l Quality
.

RESULTS-BASED
PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT -
Philippine Professional Standards for Teachers
For School Year 2021-2022

Modified and Presented by:

DR. REYNALDO D. ANTO

ESP-III
UNDERSTANDING THE
RPMS-PPST TOOLS FOR
PROFICIENT TEACHERS
Objectives
At the end of the session, theparticipants are expected
to:

1. explain the salient features of the RPMS-PPST SY

2021-22 and Classroom Observation Tools for
Proficient Teachers;
2. express appreciation on the appropriate MOVs per
KRA/Objective based on the teachers’ context;
3. accomplish Teacher’s COT Rating Sheet based on the
recorded video lesson demonstration.
Review/Kumustahan

How far is your implementation

of this RPMS-PPST for teachers SY
2021-2022 in your respective schools?
 An In- Depth Look
02 into the 18 PPST
Indicators
A comprehensive discussion on the indicators and MOVs
for Proficient /Teacher Broadcasters
 SCOPE OF THE SY 21- 22
INDICATORS
Full-time Teacher
Regular Teacher
Broadcaster
• Has direct contact • Those with official
with learners Reassignment Orders
• Adopts any of the to the Central Office
following learning • Has no direct
delivery contact with
students
modalities
• Delivers lessons
 Synchronous through TV-based,
learning Radio-based, and/or
 Asynchronous DepEd Teleradyo
learning • Creates and
 Blended learning
contextualizes videos
 M odular learning
 Limited face-to lessons and radio-
face classes based instructions
RPMS- PPST Tool for
Proficient Teachers
(Regular Teachers)
 SUMMARY INDICATORS FOR PROFICIENT
*for BOTH Regular Teacher and Full-time Teacher Broadcaster
TEACHERS
COI
1.1.2 Apply knowledge of content within and across curriculum teaching areas.
1.2.
NCOI Use research-based knowledge and principles of teaching and learning to enhance professional practice.
2
1.6.2 Display proficient use of Mother Tongue, Filipino and English to facilitate teaching and learning
1.7.2 Use effective verbal and non-verbal classroom communication strategies to support learner understanding,
participation, engagement and achievement.
2.1.2 Establish safe and secure learning environments to enhance learning through the consistent implementation of
policies, guidelines and procedures.
2.2.2 aintain learning environments that promote fairness, respect and care to encourage
COI/NCOI
M learningsupportive learning environments that nurture and inspire learners to participate, cooperate and collaborate
2.4.2 Maintain
in continued learning
2.5.2 Apply a range of successful strategies that maintain learning environments that motivate learners to work
productively by
assuming responsibility for their own learning
3.3.2 Design, adapt and implement teaching strategies that are responsive to learners with disabilities, giftedness and
talents.
3.5.2 Adapt and use culturally appropriate teaching strategies to address the needs of learners from indigenous groups.
4.3.2 Adapt and implement learning programs that ensure relevance and responsiveness to the needs of all learners.
5.5.2 Utilize assessment data to inform the modification of teaching and learning practices and programs.
6.1.2 Maintain learning environments that are responsive to community contexts.
6.3.2 Review regularly personal teaching practice using existing laws and regulations that apply to the teaching profession and
the responsibilities specified in the Code of Ethics for Professional Teachers
6.4.2 Comply with and implement school policies and procedures consistently to foster harmonious relationships with learners,
parents, and other stakeholders.
7.1.2 Apply a personal philosophy of teaching that is learner-centered.
7.2.2 Adopt practices that uphold the dignity of teaching as a profession by exhibiting qualities such as caring attitude, respect
Classroom
Observable
Indicators (COIs) for
Proficient Teachers
CLASSROOM OBSERVATION TOOL-RPMS
!!)(

PROIFICIENf 1' 1EAYC'

IHIEIRS
(Teacher 1-111)

S.Y. 2021-2022
 RUBRIC LEVEL
SUMMARY

LEVEL LEVEL LABEL LEVEL DESCRIPTION

3 ORGANIZING The teacher demonstrates a limited range of loosely-associated pedagogical aspects of the indicator.

The teacher demonstrates a range of associated pedagogical aspects of the indicator that sometimes are aligned
4 DEVELOPING with the learners' developmental needs.

The teacher demonstrates a range of associated pedagogical aspects of the indicator that usually are alignedwith
5 APPLYING the learners' developmental needs.

The teacher uses well-connectedpedagogical aspects of the indicator that consistently are aligned with
6 CONSOLIDATING student development and support students to be successful learners.

The teacher uses well-connected pedagogical aspects of the indicator to create an environment that
7 INTEGRATING addresses individualand group learning goals. ,,
,'/
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --.r- - ----- -- -...AD
- - - - - - 1/
 KRA 1: Content Knowledge and Pedagogy
PERFORMANCE INDICATOR
MEANS OF Very
OBJECTIVE Outstanding Satisfac tory Unsatisfactory Poor
VERIFICAT ION QET Satisfactory
(5) (4) (3) (2) ( 1)
4. Used Classroom Obser vation Demonstrated Demonstrated Demonstrated Demonstrated Demonstrated
eff ective verbal Too l (COT) rating sheet or Level 7 in Level 6 in Level 5 in L e vel 4 in Level 3 in
and non-verba l inter-observer agreement Objective 4 as Objective 4 as Objective 4 as Objective 4 as Objective 4 as
classroom form from shown in COT shown in COT shown in COT shown in COT shown in COT
co mmunication -1 an observation of rating sheets I ra ting sheets rating sheets / rating sheets I rating sheets /
I in te r-
strategies to synchronous inter-obse rver inter-observer inter-observer inter-obse rver observer
support learner teaching (limited face- agreemen t agree ment agreement agreement agreeme nt
unde rstand ing, to-face teaching, online forms forms fo rms forms forms
pa rticipatio n , teachi ng, or two-way
en gage ment radio instruction) or
and _2 if option 1 is Quality
not No acceptable
achievement possible, an obse rvation evidence was
of a recorded video shown
lesson or audio lesson
that is SLM-base d or
MELC-aligne d
_ 3 if options 1 and 2 are
not possible, an
observation of a
demo nstration teaching•
..For mOOu l ar approach , de monstration teaching via LAC must reflect the teaching-lea rning process m
the said modality. The MOV (COT rating sheet or inter-observer agreement form) shall
via L AC
also be complemented with any annotated document (e_g _, module, screenshot of instant messag ing, no tels showing instructions, narrative) indicating occurrence of follow through,
monitoring, etc_

Note· For this objective, two MOVs are required for the entire school year_ I n computing the rating for Quality: (i) get the corresponding RPMS 5-point scale rati ng of each COT rating;
(ii) calculate the average of the RPMS ratings; and (iii) find the transmuted RPMS ratin_g See sam ple com putation belo w:
COT RPMS 5-point RPMS Rating for RPMS Rating
Means of Ver ifi ca tion Ratinq Average Tran sm utation Tab le
Scale Ratin q Quality
COT Rating Sheet 1 6 4 4 Outstanding (5) ,4 5 0 0-, 5 0
3-500 00
COT Rating Sheet 2 5 3 (Very Satisfacto ry )
Very Satisfactory (4) ,3 5 0 0-4-499
Satisfactory (3 ) 2,5 0 0-3-499
Unsatisfactory (2) ,1 5 0 0-2-499
Poor (1) 1-000-1-499
SULONG
6 KALIDA
RPMS Tool for SY 2021-2022 1 Proficient Teachers
D
 KRA 2: Learning Environment
PERFORMANCE INDICATO R
MEANS OF Very
OBJECTIVE Outstanding Satisfactory Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor
VERIFICATION QET
(5) (4) (3) (2) (1)
5. Established Class room Observation Demonstra ted Demonstrated Demonstrated Demonstrated Demonstrated
safe and Tool (CO T) rating sheet or Leve l 7 in Level 6 1n Level 5 in Level 4 in Level 3 in
secure learning inter-observer agreement ObJe ctive 5 Objective 5 as Objective 5 as Objective 5 as Objective 5 as
environments to form from as shown in shown in COT shown in COT shown in COT shown in COT
enhance 1. an observation of COT rating rating sheets I rating sheets I rating sheets I rating sheets /
learning through synchronous sheets I inter- inte r-observer inler-observer in ter-observer inter-observer
the consistent teaching (limited face- observer agreement agreement agreement agreement
i mpleme ntation to-face teaching, online agreement forms fo rms forms forms
of policies, teaching, or two-way form s
guid elin es radio instruction) or
and proced 2. if option 1 is not
ures possible, an observation Quality No acceptable
of a recorded video evidence was
lesson or audio lesson shown
that is SLM-based or
MELC-aligned
3. if options 1 and 2 are not
possible, an observation
of a de monstration
teaching • via LAC

For m odular approach , demonstration teachmg via LAC must reflec t the teach1ng - leammg process 111 the said m odali ty. The MOY (COT ra n g sheet or 1nt e r -<Jb server agreement fonn) shall
also be complemen ted with any annotated document (e.g., module, screenshot of instant messaging, notels showing instructions, narrative) indicating occurrence of follow through , m onitoring,
etc.

Note: For this objective, two MOVs are required for the entire school year. In computing the rating for Quality: (i) get the corresponding RPMS 5-point scale rating of each COT rating;
(ii) calculate the .average of the RPMS ratings ; and (iii) find the tra11s mu t ed RPMS rating _ S ee s ample comp u tat ion below :
COT RP MS 5-poi RPMS Rat ing for RPMS Rating
Means of Verifi ca t ion Average
Ratinq nt Scale Rati Qual ity Trans m utati o11 Ta
nq ble
COT Rating Sheet 1 6 4 4 Outstanding (5) 4.500-5.000
3.500
COT Rating Sheet 2 5 3 (>/ery Satisfactory ) Very Satisfactory (4) 3.500-4.499
Satisfactory (3) 2.500-3.499
Unsatisfactory (2) 1.500-2.499
Poor (1) 1.000-1.499
SULONG
7
RPMS Tool for S.Y. 2021-2022 1 Proficient Teachers
KALIDAD
 KRA 2: Learning Environment
PERFORMANCE INDICATOR
MEANS OF Very
OBJECTIVE Outstanding Satisfactory Unsatisfactory Poor
VERIFICATION QET Satisfactory
(5) 141 (3) (2) (1I
6. Maintained Classroom Observat ion Demonstrated Demons trated De monstrated Demonstrated Demonstrated
learning Tool (COT) rati ng sheet or Level 7 in Leve l 6 in Leve l 5 in Leve l 4 in Level 3 in
environment inter-observer agreeme nt Objective 6 as Objective 6 as Objective 6 as Objective 6 as Objective 6 as
s
that p romote form from shown in COT shown in COT shown in COT shown in COT shown in COT
fairness, 1. an obse rvation of rating sheets / rating sheets / rating sheets / rating sheets I rating sheets /
respec t and synchronous inter-observer inter-observer inter-observer inter-observer inter-obse rver
care to teaching (limited agreement forms agreement agreement agreement forms agreeme nt fo
face- rms
enco urage to-face teaching, online forms forms
learning teaching, or two-way or
radio instruction)
Qua lity
2. if option 1 1s not No accep table
possib le, an observation evidence was
of a recorde d video shown
lesson or audio lesson /
/
that is SLM-based or
MELC-aligned
3. if options 1 and 2 are not
possible, an observation
of a demonstration
'For modular approach, deteaching•
monstrationvia
teaching
LAC via LAC must reflect the
teach1ng - l e ammg process m the said modality. The MOV (COT rabng sheet or 1nt e r-0b server agreement form) shall
also be complemented with any annotated document (e.g., module, screenshot of instan t m essag ing , noteis showing instructions. narrative) indicating occurrence off ollow throug h, m
onrtoring, etc.

Note: For this objective, two MOV s are required for the entire school year. In computing the rating for Quality: (i ) get the corresponding RPMS 5-point scale rating of eac h COT rating ;
(ii ) calculate the average of the RPMS ratings; and (iii) find the transmuted RPMS rating. See sample co mputatio n below :
COT RPM S 5-po int RPM S Ra t in g fo RPM S Ra ti n g
Mean s of Ver ifi cation Ratina Ave rage Transmutmi on Table
Sc ale Rali na r Qualit v
COT Rating Sheet 1 6 4 4 O uts tanding (5) 4.500-5.000
3.500
CO T Rating Sheet 2 5 3 (Very Satisfactory) Very Satisfactory (4) 3.500-4.499
Satisractory (3) 2.500-3.499
Unsatisfactory (2) 1 500-2 499
Poor (1) 1.000-1.499

SULONG
8 E uKALI
RPMS Tool for S.Y. 2021-2022 1 Proficient Teachers
DAD
Objectives that
have SET A or SET
B MOVs may be
considered as
either COI or NCOI

The teacher has

the freedom to
choose which set
of MOVs they
will
prepare/submit
based on their
context
Objectives that
have SET A or SET
B MOVs may be
considered as
either COI or NCOI

The teacher has

the freedom to
choose which set
of MOVs they
will
prepare/submit
based on their
context
Objectives that
have SET A or SET
B MOVs may be
considered as
either COI or NCOI

The teacher shall

choose the set
of MOV that is
aligned with their
learner
demographic
Objectives that
have SET A or SET
B MOVs may be
considered as
either COI or NCOI

The teacher shall

choose the set
of MOV that is
aligned with their
learner
demographic
Non- Classroom
Observable Indicators
(NCOIs) for Proficient
Teachers
Performance will
be based on
the presented
MOV
Performance will
be based on
the presented
MOV
Performance will
be based on
the presented
MOV
Performance
will be
based on
the
presented
MOV
Performance will
be based on
the presented
MOV
Performance will
be based on
the presented
MOV
Performance will
be based on
the presented
MOVs
Performance will be based on the presented
MOV
Performance will
depend on the
scope of coverage
of the
work/activity that
contributed to the
teaching-learning
process and not
the quantity
 THANK YOU!
Do you have any questions? Checkout our websites
or
reach us via e-mail/telephone.

Bureau of Human Resource and Philippine Normal University –

Organizational Development Research Center for Teacher Quality
(PNU-RCTQ)
https://www.deped.gov.ph
[email protected] https://www.rctq.ph
+63 2 8470-6630 [email protected]
+63 2 53171768 Local 763/764