TOPIC:-POWER FACTOR TARIFF,

ADVANTAGE & DISADVANTAGE

NAME:-RAHUL SHARMA
ROLL:- 24001621064
DEPARTMENT:- ELECTRICAL
ENGINEERING
YEAR:-3 YEAR,SEM 5TH
RD
POWERFACTOR—
THE BASICS
Question #1: What is Power Factor?

Question #2: What Causes Low Power Factor?

Question #3: Why Should I Improve My Power Factor?

Question #4: How Do I Correct (Improve) My Power Factor?

Question #5: How Long Will It Take My Investment in Power Factor

Correction to Pay for Itself?

Question #6: Advantages and disadvantages of power factor

Question #1:
What is Power Factor?

Super. I’m ready to find out what power

factor is.

To understand power factor, we’ll first start with the

definition of some basic terms:

KW is Working Power (also called Actual

Power or Active Power or Real Power).
It is the power that actually powers the equipment and
performs useful work.

KVAR is Reactive Power.

It is the power that magnetic equipment (transformer, motor
and relay) needs to produce the magnetizing flux.

KVA is Apparent Power.

It is the “vectorial summation” of KVAR and KW.
Let’s look at a simple analogy in order to better understand these terms….

Let’s say you are at the ballpark and it is a really hot day. You order up a
mug of your favorite brewsky. The thirst-quenching portion of your beer
is represented by KW (Figure 1).

Unfortunately, life isn’t perfect. Along with your ale comes a little bit of
foam. (And let’s face it…that foam just doesn’t quench your thirst.) This
foam is represented by KVAR.

The total contents of your mug, KVA, is this summation of KW (the beer)
and KVAR (the foam).

Figure 1

So, now that we understand some basic terms, we are ready to learn about power factor:

Power Factor (P.F.) is the ratio of Working Power to Apparent Power.

P.F. = KW
KVA

Looking at our beer mug analogy above, power factor would be the ratio
of beer (KW) to beer plus foam (KVA).

P.F. = KW
KW + KVAR

.= Beer
Beer
+ Foam
 Thus, for a given KVA:

 The more foam you have (the higher the percentage of

KVAR), the lower your ratio of KW (beer) to KVA (beer
plus foam). Thus, the lower your power factor.
 The less foam you have (the lower the percentage of
KVAR), the higher your ratio of KW (beer) to KVA (beer
plus foam). In fact, as your foam (or KVAR) approaches
zero, your power factor approaches 1.0.

Our beer mug analogy is a bit simplistic. In reality, when we calculate

KVA, we must determine the “vectorial summation” of KVAR and KW.
Therefore, we must go one step further and look at the angle between
these vectors.

Let’s look at another analogy ……

Mac here is dragging a heavy load (Figure 2). Mac’s Working Power (or
Actual Power) in the forward direction, where he most wants his load to
travel, is KW.

Unfortunately, Mac can’t drag his load on a perfect horizontal (he would
get a tremendous backache), so his shoulder height adds a little Reactive
Power, or KVAR.

The Apparent Power Mac is dragging, KVA, is this “vectorial summation”

of KVAR and KW.

Figure 2

The “Power Triangle” (Figure 3) illustrates this relationship between KW, KVA, KVAR,
and Power Factor:
 The Power Triangle

KVA
K
V
A
R

K
W

P.F.
=

K
KVA = KW2 + KVAR2 = KV * I * 3
W

Figure 3
=
CO
Note
S  that…in an ideal world…looking at the beer mug analogy:
 K KVAR would be very small (foam would be approaching zero)
 V KW and KVA would be almost equal (more beer; less foam)
A
Similarly…in an ideal world…looking at Mac’s heavy load analogy:
 KVAR would be very small (approaching zero)
 KW and KVA would be almost equal (Mac wouldn’t have to
K waste any power along his body height)
V The angle  (formed between KW and KVA) would approach
A zero
R Cosine  would then approach one
 Power Factor would approach one
=

So…. S
In order to haveIan “efficient” system (whether it is the beer mug or Mac dragging
a heavy load), we wantNpower factor to be as close to 1.0 as possible.

Sometimes, however,
 our electrical distribution has a power factor much less than
K Next, we’ll see what causes this.
V
A
 Question #2:
What Causes Low Power Factor?

Great. I now understand what power factor is. But I’ve been told mine is low.
What did I do to cause this?

Since power factor is defined as the ratio of KW to KVA, we see that low power
factor results when KW is small in relation to KVA. Remembering our beer mug
analogy, this would occur when KVAR (foam, or Mac’s shoulder height) is large.

What causes a large KVAR in a system? The answer is…inductive

loads.

Inductive loads (which are sources of Reactive Power) include:

 Transformers
 Induction motors
 Induction generators (wind mill generators)
 High intensity discharge (HID) lighting

These inductive loads constitute a major portion of the power consumed in

industrial complexes.

Reactive power (KVAR) required by inductive loads increases the amount of

apparent power (KVA) in your distribution system (Figure 4). This increase in reactive
and apparent power results in a larger angle  (measured between KW and KVA). Recall
that, as  increases, cosine  (or power factor) decreases.

KVA
KVAR

KVA
KVAR

 

KW KW
Figure 4

So, inductive loads (with large KVAR) result in low power factor.
 Question #3:
Why Should I Improve My Power Factor?

Okay. So I’ve got inductive loads at my facility that are causing my power factor
to be low. Why should I want to improve it?

You want to improve your power factor for several different reasons. Some of the
benefits of improving your power factor include:

1) Lower utility fees by:

a. Reducing peak KW billing demand

Recall that inductive loads, which require reactive power, caused

your low power factor. This increase in required reactive power
(KVAR) causes an increase in required apparent power (KVA),
which is what the utility is supplying.

So, a facility’s low power factor causes the utility to have to

increase its generation and transmission capacity in order to handle
this extra demand.

By raising your power factor, you use less KVAR. This results in
less KW, which equates to a dollar savings from the utility.

b. Eliminating the power factor penalty

Utilities usually charge customers an additional fee when their

power factor is less than 0.95. (In fact, some utilities are not
obligated to deliver electricity to their customer at any time the
customer’s power factor falls below 0.85.) Thus, you can avoid
this additional fee by increasing your power factor.

2) Increased system capacity and reduced system losses in your electrical

system

By adding capacitors (KVAR generators) to the system, the power

factor is improved and the KW capacity of the system is increased.

For example, a 1,000 KVA transformer with an 80% power factor

provides 800 KW (600 KVAR) of power to the main bus.

1000 KVA =

(800 KW)2 + ( ? KVAR)2 KVAR = 600

 By increasing the power factor to 90%, more KW can be supplied
for the same amount of KVA.

1000 KVA =

(900 KW)2 + ( ? KVAR)2 KVAR = 436

The KW capacity of the system increases to 900 KW and the

utility supplies only 436 KVAR.

Uncorrected power factor causes power system losses in your

distribution system. By improving your power factor, these losses
can be reduced. With the current rise in the cost of energy,
increased facility efficiency is very desirable. And with lower
system losses, you are also able to add additional load to your
system.

3) Increased voltage level in your electrical system and cooler, more efficient
motors

As mentioned above, uncorrected power factor causes power system

losses in your distribution system. As power losses increase,
you may experience voltage drops. Excessive voltage drops can
cause overheating and premature failure of motors and other
inductive equipment.

So, by raising your power factor, you will minimize these voltage
drops along feeder cables and avoid related problems. Your
motors will run cooler and be more efficient, with a slight increase
in capacity and starting torque.
 Question #4
How Do I Correct (Improve) My Power Factor?

All right. You’ve convinced me. I sure would like to save some money on my
power bill and extend the life of my motors. But how do I go about improving (i.e.,
increasing) my power factor?

We have seen that sources of Reactive Power (inductive loads) decrease

power factor:
 Transformers
 Induction motors
 Induction generators (wind mill generators)
 High intensity discharge (HID) lighting

Similarly, consumers of Reactive Power increase power factor:

 Capacitors
 Synchronous generators (utility and emergency)
 Synchronous motors

Thus, it comes as no surprise that one way to increase power factor is to add
capacitors to the system. This--and other ways of increasing power factor--are listed
below:

1) Installing capacitors (KVAR Generators)

Installing capacitors decreases the magnitude of reactive power

(KVAR or foam), thus increasing your power factor.
Here is how it works (Figure 5)…
Reactive power (KVARS), caused by inductive
loads, always acts at a 90-degree angle to working power
(KW).

Capacitance
(KVAR)

Working
Power
(KW)

Reactance
(KVAR)

Figure 5
 Inductance and capacitance react 180 degrees to each other.
Capacitors store KVARS and release energy opposing the
reactive energy caused by the inductor.

The presence of both a capacitor and inductor in the same

circuit results in the continuous alternating transfer of
energy between the two.

Thus, when the circuit is balanced, all the energy released

by the inductor is absorbed by the capacitor.

Following is an example of how a capacitor cancels out the effect of an

inductive load….

2) Minimizing operation of idling or lightly loaded motors.

We already talked about the fact that low power factor is caused by the
presence of induction motors. But, more specifically, low power factor is
caused by running induction motors lightly loaded.

3) Avoiding operation of equipment above its rated voltage.

4) Replacing standard motors as they burn out with energy-efficient

motors.

Even with energy-efficient motors, power factor is significantly affected

by variations in load. A motor must be operated near its rated load in
order to realize the benefits of a high power factor design.
 Question #5
How Long Will It Take my Investment in Power Factor
Correction to Pay for Itself?

Super, I’ve learned that by installing capacitors at my facility, I can improve my power
factor. But buying capacitors costs money. How long will it take for the reduction in my
power bill to pay for the cost of the capacitors?

A calculation can be run to determine when this payoff will be. As an example,
assume that a portion of your facility can be modeled as in Figure 6 below. Your current
power factor is 0.65.

Following are the parameters for your original system:

 163 KW load
 730 hours per month
 480 Volt, 3 phase service
 5% system losses
 Load PF = 65%
 PSE Rate Schedule:
 Energy Rate = $4.08 per KWH
 Demand Charge = $2.16 per KW
 PF Penalty = $0.15 per KVARH

Figure 6
 We’ll calculate the total amount the utility charges you every month as follows:

First, we’ll calculate your energy usage:

163 KW X 730 Hours/Month X $4.08/KWH = $4,854.79/Month

Next, we’ll calculate your demand charge:

163 KW X $2.16/KW = $352.08/Month

Finally, we’ll calculate your Power Factor Penalty:

190 KVAR X 730 Hours/Month X $0.15/KVARH =

$208/Month

Now, let’s say that you decide to install a capacitor bank (Figure 7). The 190
KVAR from the capacitor cancels out the 190 KVAR from the inductive motor. Your
power factor is now 1.0.

Following are your parameters for your system with capacitors:

 Corrected PF = 1.0

Figure 7
 You can calculate your loss reduction:

Loss Reduction = 1-(0.652 / 1.002) = 0.58

Therefore, your system loss reduction will be as follows:

0.58 X 0.05 (losses) = 0.029 System Loss Reduction

Your total KW load will be reduced as follows:

163 KW X 0.029 = 4.7 KW

Now we can calculate your savings in energy usage:

4.7 KW X 730 Hours/Month X $4.08/KWH = $141.00/Month

Next, we’ll calculate your savings in demand charge:

4.7 KW X $2.16/KW = $10.15/Month

Finally, remember that your Power Factor Penalty is zero.

Let’s calculate how long it will take for this capacitor bank to pay for itself.

Capacitor Cost = $30.00/KVAR

Your savings per month are as follows:

 $141.00 Energy Usage

 $ 10.15 Demand Charge
 $208.00 PF Penalty Charge
$359.15 Total

Your payback will be at the following time:

$30.00/KVAR X 190 KVAR/$359/Month = 16 Months

Installation of your capacitors will pay for themselves in 16 months.

 Question #6: Advantages and disadvantages of power factor
ADVANTAGES

1. REDUCED DEMAND CHARGES

Most electric utility companies charge for maximum metered demand based on either the
highest registered demand in kilowatts (KW meter), or a percentage of the highest
registered demand in KVA (KVA meter), whichever is greater. If the power factor is low, the
percentage of the measured KVA will be significantly greater than the KW demand.
Improving the power factor through power factor correction will therefore lower the
demand charge, helping to reduce your electricity bill.

2.INCREASED LOAD CARRYING CAPABILITIES IN EXISTING

CIRCUITS
Loads drawing reactive power also demand reactive current. Installing power factor
correction capacitors at the end of existing circuits near the inductive loads reduces the
current carried by each circuit. The reduction in current flow resulting from improved power
factor may allow the circuit to carry new loads, saving the cost of upgrading the distribution
network when extra capacity is required for additional machinery or equipment, saving your
company thousands of dollars in unnecessary upgrade costs. In addition, the reduced current
flow reduces resistive losses in the circuit.

3. IMPROVED VOLTAGE
A lower power factor causes a higher current flow for a given load. As the line current
increases, the voltage drop in the conductor increases, which may result in a lower voltage
at the equipment. With an improved power factor, the voltage drop in the conductor is
reduced, improving the voltage at the equipment.

4. REDUCED POWER SYSTEM LOSSES

Although the financial return from conductor loss reduction alone is seldom sufficient to
justify the installation of capacitors, it is sometimes an attractive additional benefit;
especially in older plants with long feeders or in field pumping operations. System
conductor losses are proportional to the current squared and, since the current is reduced
in direct proportion to the power factor improvement, the losses are inversely
proportional to the square of the power factor.

5. REDUCED CARBON FOOTPRINT

By reducing your power system’s demand charge through power factor correction, your
company is putting less strain on the electricity grid, therefore reducing its carbon footprint.
Over time, this lowered demand on the electricity grid can account for hundreds of tons of
reduced carbon production, all thanks to the improvement of your power system’s electrical
efficiency via power factor correction.
 DISADVANTAGES:-

Disadvantages of low power factor:

 Large kVA rating of the equipment.


 Greater conductor size.

 Large copper losses.

 Poor voltage regulation.

 The reduced handling capacity of the system.

 The cost of station and distribution equipment is more for a given load.