Sampling Techniques
Sampling Techniques
Sampling Techniques
Adv.
access to difficult to reach populations
(other methods may not yield any results).
Disadv.
not representative of the population and will result
in a biased sample as it is self-selecting.
PROBABILITY SAMPLING
SIMPLE RANDOM SAMPLING
Adv.
No personal bias.
Sample more representative of population.
Accuracy can be assessed as sampling errors follow
principals of chance.
Disadv.
Requires completely catalogued population.
SYSTEMATIC Random
SAMPLING
Selecting first unit at random.
Selecting additional units at evenly spaced
intervals.
Complete list of population available.
k=N/n
k=sampling interval
N=population size
n=Sample size
STRATIFIED RANDOM
SAMPLING
population is sub divided into
mutually exclusive groups.
A simple or systematic random
sample is then chosen independently
from each group.
STRATIFIED RANDOM
SAMPLING
Issues involved in stratification
Base of stratification (according to what)
Number of strata
Sample size within strata.
Proportional to
population
Sample size within strata (proportion in each
stratum)
Disproportional to
population (equal no. in each
stratum)
STRATIFIED RANDOM
SAMPLING
Adv.
More representative.
Greater accuracy.
Disadv.
Utmost care in dividing strata.
Skilled sampling supervisors.
CLUSTER SAMPLING
A sampling technique in which the entire
population of interest is divided into groups, or
clusters, and a random sample of these clusters is
selected.
Adv.
Most economical form of sampling.
Larger sample for a similar fixed cost.
Less time for listing and implementation.
Reduce travel and other administrative costs.
Disadv.
May not reflect the diversity of the community.
errors of the estimates and results are high, compared
to other sampling designs with same sample size .
MULTISTAGE SAMPLING
Adv.
Introduces flexibility in the sampling method.
Enables existing divisions and sub divisions
of population to be used as units.
Large area can be covered.
Disadv.
Sometimes, less accurate than a sample
chosen by a single stage process.
Summary
Confidence level:
If many confidence intervals were constructed the same exact way,
this is the expected % of those intervals that would contain the true
parameter
The satisfaction level of KSA Family Medicine residents
95% C.I. = 23% - 32%