News Analysis: Denmark Says It'S Permanently Stopping Use of The Astrazeneca Vaccine
News Analysis: Denmark Says It'S Permanently Stopping Use of The Astrazeneca Vaccine
News Analysis: Denmark Says It'S Permanently Stopping Use of The Astrazeneca Vaccine
D E N M A R K S AY S I T ’ S
P E R M A N E N T LY
STOPPING USE OF THE
A S T R A Z E N E C A VA C C I N E
ID : 20181103092
Sources
Type of news
Why this news
Thoroughness
TA B L E O F
CONTENT
Fairness
Newsworthiness
How the world is represented
My personal reaction
Denmark says it’s permanently stopping use of t AstraZeneca vaccine: Denmark stops roll
he AstraZeneca vaccine. - The New York Times out completely - BBC News
(nytimes.com)
SOURCES:
IT IS
CONSIDERED
AS
TYPE OF NEWS:
HARD NEWS
WHY THIS NEWS
• It is a controversial topic.
• The AstraZeneca suspension delays the country’s vaccine rollout plans, but
the health authority said in a statement that the availability of other vaccines
combined with the pandemic being under control at the moment meant the
inoculation campaign could continue without it.
FA I R N E S S
FROM WHOSE VIEWPOINT IS THE
STORY TOLD?
• Reporters:
By Elian Peltier – NYT
Not written – BBC
• Persuasive language:
“Public health officials have warned that pausing administration of vaccines like
AstraZeneca’s or Johnson & Johnson’s could do more harm than good. “ – NYT
“It is important that this vaccine continue to be deployed. It is a vaccine that is safe and
works”
“For both AstraZeneca and Johnson & Johnson, the blood clot side effects are
extremely rare.” - BCC
THE TYPE OF LANGUAGE
CHOSEN:
• Informative language:
“Almost one million people in Denmark have
been vaccinated, with approximately 150,000
of them receiving the AstraZeneca jab. The
Pfizer/BioNTech and Moderna vaccines are
also in use.”
IS THE STORY SLANTED OR BIASED?
• The news appeals to be emotional specifically it gives negative emotions to the reader as
it discuss a sensitive case. Especially that Many are hesitant to get vaccinated and are in
wait-and-see mode as their most concern is about the side effects of the vaccines.
R E P R E S E N TAT I O N O F T H E
WORLD
• This particular news reflected the seriousness of the side effects of the vaccines.
• However, it is obvious that they are afraid that the public confidence in using the
vaccine will be dented.
• They wanted to rebuild confidence of using the vaccine.
PERSONAL REACTION
• comparing between NYT and BBC, BCC were definitely trying to cover
all the angles of the story and it has even given contradicting statements.
“It shows when EMA / European medicine agency announce that rare
clotting events should be listed as a possible side effect of the AstraZeneca
vaccine, but stressed that it has been proven to prevent severe disease.”
THANK YOU