Smart Camera As Embedded Systems: M.Tech

Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 21

SMART CAMERA AS EMBEDDED

SYSTEMS

Submitted by: Under the guidance of:


D.Guru Teja G.Sanjeevrayudu, M.Tech
188U1A0416 Assistant Professor
IV-ECE Department of ECE
CONTENTS
 Abstract
 Introduction
 Smart Cameras
 Networks of Embedded Cameras
 Improving Smart Camera Design
 Detection and Recognition Algorithms
 Smart Camera Prototype
 Advantages
 Disadvantages
 Applications
 Conclusion
 References
ABSTRACT
Recent technological advances are enabling a new
generation of smart cameras that represent a quantum
leap in sophistication. While today's digital cameras
capture images, smart cameras capture high-level
descriptions of the scene and analyze what they see.
These devices could support a wide variety of
applications including human and animal detection,
surveillance, motion analysis, and facial identification.
Video processing has an insatiable demand for real-
time performance.
Introduction

 Video surveillance is becoming more and more


essential now-a-days as society relies on video
surveillance to improve security and safety.

 For security, such systems are usually installed in areas


where crime can occur such as banks and car parks.

 For safety, the systems are installed in areas where


there is the possibility of accidents such as on roads or
motorways and at construction sites.
Smart Cameras
 Smart cameras are equipped with a high-performance
onboard computing and communication infrastructure,
combining in a single embedded device
video sensing
processing
communications
Smart Cameras

Basic smart camera architecture


Networks of Embedded Systems
Networks of embedded cameras can potentially
support more complex and challenging applications:
_Surveillance
Tracking
Motion analysis
Improving Smart Camera Design
 High resolution image sensor
 High bandwidth communication interface
 Reconfigurable platform for hardware and software
processors.
Improved Smart Camera Design
Architecture

Proposed System Architecture


Detection and Recognition Algorithms

Our algorithms use both-


(A)Low-level processing
(B)High-level processing
A)LOW-LEVEL PROCESSING

 Contour following
 Region extraction
 Ellipse fitting
 Graph matching
(a)Region extraction (b)Contour following (c)Ellipse fitting (d)Graph
matching

(a) (b)

(c) (d)
(B)HIGH-LEVEL PROCESSING
The high-level processing component, which can be
adapted to different applications, compares the motion
pattern of each body part—described as a spatiotemporal
sequence of feature vectors—in a set of frames to the
patterns of known postures and gestures and then uses
several hidden Markov mod- els in parallel to evaluate the
body’s overall activity.
Smart Camera Prototype

 Commercial off the shelf hardware components to test and


evaluate the video surveillance system
 1 cam consists of:
network processor
several DSPs
a CMOS image sensor
Advantages
 Allow system Integrators and manufacturers
 High performance in a compact package
 versatile enough to fit a wide range of industrial imaging
needs.
Disadvantages
They have difficulty managing more sophisticated
algorithms.
Complex images or operations requiring rapid analysis are
typically outside their scope.
Smart cameras often use proprietary hardware ,making
replacement or modification.
Applications
Human and animal detection
Motion analysis
Facial identification
CONCLUSION
Keys to successful deployment of smart cameras are:
The integration of sensing, computing, and
communication in a small, power-aware embedded
device.The availability of high-level image/video
processing algorithms.
REFERENCES
 J.M. Siskind, “Visual Event Classification via Force Dynamics,”
Proc. 17th Nat’l Conf. Artificial Intelligence and 12th Conf.
Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence (AAAI/IAAI
00), AAAI Press/MIT Press, Menlo Park, Calif., 2000, pp. 149-155.
 M. Lucente, G-J. Zwart, and A.D. George, “Visualization Space:
A Testbed for Deviceless Multimodal User Interface,” Computer
Graphics, vol. 31, no. 2, 1997;
http://www.lucente.biz/pubs/pubs.html.
 T.B. Moeslund and E. Granum, “A Survey of Computer Vision-
Based Human Motion Capture,” Computer Vision and Image
Understanding, vol. 81, no. 3, 2001, pp. 231-268.
Thank You

Any queries?

You might also like