0% found this document useful (0 votes)
81 views

Convenient Representation of A Linear, Dynamic Model. - A Transfer Function (TF) Relates One Input and One Output

1. The document discusses transfer functions, which relate the input and output of a linear dynamic system. 2. It provides an example of developing a transfer function to model a stirred tank heating process. This yields two first-order transfer functions - one relating output temperature to input heat (G1), and one relating output to disturbance in inlet temperature (G2). 3. Key properties of transfer function models are discussed, including their ability to determine system response via superposition, and relating their order to the underlying differential equation model.

Uploaded by

meseret sisay
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
81 views

Convenient Representation of A Linear, Dynamic Model. - A Transfer Function (TF) Relates One Input and One Output

1. The document discusses transfer functions, which relate the input and output of a linear dynamic system. 2. It provides an example of developing a transfer function to model a stirred tank heating process. This yields two first-order transfer functions - one relating output temperature to input heat (G1), and one relating output to disturbance in inlet temperature (G2). 3. Key properties of transfer function models are discussed, including their ability to determine system response via superposition, and relating their order to the underlying differential equation model.

Uploaded by

meseret sisay
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 26

Transfer Functions

• Convenient representation of a linear, dynamic model.


• A transfer function (TF) relates one input and one output:

u (t ) y (t )
Chapter 4

 system 
U ( s) Y (s)

The following terminology is used:

u y
input output
forcing function response
“cause” “effect”
Definition of the transfer function:
Let G(s) denote the transfer function between an input, x, and an
output, y. Then, by definition
Y ( s)
G( s) 
U ( s)
Chapter 4

where:

Y ( s )  L y (t ) 
U ( s )  L u (t ) 

Development of Transfer Functions


Example: Stirred Tank Heating System
Chapter 4

Figure 2.3 Stirred-tank heating process with constant holdup, V.


Recall the previous dynamic model, assuming constant liquid
holdup and flow rates:
dT
V C  wC Ti  T   Q (2-36)
dt
Suppose the process is at steady state:
Chapter 4

0  wC Ti  T   Q (2)

Subtract (2) from (2-36):

dT
V C  wC Ti  Ti   T  T   Q  Q  (3)
dt
But,

dT 
V C  wC Ti  T    Q (4)
dt

where the “deviation variables” are


Chapter 4

T   T  T , Ti  Ti  Ti , Q  Q  Q

Take L of (4):
V  C  sT   s   T   0   wC Ti s   T   s   Q  s  (5)

At the initial steady state, T′(0) = 0.


Rearrange (5) to solve for

 K   1 
T s     Q  s     Ti s  (6)
  s 1   s 1
where
Chapter 4

1 V
K and  
wC w
T (s)=G1(s)Q(s)  G2(s)Ti(s)

G1 and G2 are transfer functions and independent of the


inputs, Q′ and Ti′.
Note G1 (process) has gain K and time constant 
Chapter 4

G2 (disturbance) has gain=1 and time constant 


gain = G(s=0). Both are first order processes.
If there is no change in inlet temperature (Ti′= 0),
then Ti′(s) = 0.
System can be forced by a change in either Ti or Q
(see Example 4.3).
Conclusions about TFs
1. Note that (6) shows that the effects of changes in both Q
and Ti are additive. This always occurs for linear, dynamic
models (like TFs) because the Principle of Superposition is
Chapter 4

valid.
2. The TF model enables us to determine the output response to
any change in an input.
3. Use deviation variables to eliminate initial conditions for TF
models.
Example: Stirred Tank Heater
K  0.05   2.0
0.05 No change in Ti′
T  Q
2s  1
Step change in Q(t): 1500 cal/sec to 2000 cal/sec
Chapter 4

500

Q 
s
0.05 500 25
T  
2s  1 s s (2s  1)
What is T′(t)? From line 13, Table 3.1
 t / 25
T (t )  25[1  e ] 
 T (s) 
s ( s  1)
 t / 2
T (t )  25[1  e ]
Properties of Transfer Function Models

1. Steady-State Gain
The steady-state of a TF can be used to calculate the steady-
state change in an output due to a steady-state change in the
Chapter 4

input. For example, suppose we know two steady states for an


input, u, and an output, y. Then we can calculate the steady-
state gain, K, from:

y2  y1
K (4-38)
u2  u1

For a linear system, K is a constant. But for a nonlinear


system, K will depend on the operating condition u , y .
Calculation of K from the TF Model:
If a TF model has a steady-state gain, then:

K  lim G  s  (14)
s 0
Chapter 4

• This important result is a consequence of the Final Value


Theorem

• Note: Some TF models do not have a steady-state gain (e.g.,


integrating process in Ch. 5)
2. Order of a TF Model
Consider a general n-th order, linear ODE:
dny dy n1 dy d mu
an n
 an 1   a1  a0 y  bm m 
dt dt n 1 dt dt
d m1u du
Chapter 4

bm1 m1
   b1  b0u (4-39)
dt dt

Take L, assuming the initial conditions are all zero. Rearranging


gives the TF:
m

Y s 
i
b s i

G s   i 0
(4-40)
U s  n
i
a s i

i 0
Definition:
The order of the TF is defined to be the order of the denominator
polynomial.
Note: The order of the TF is equal to the order of the ODE.
Chapter 4

Physical Realizability:
For any physical system, n  m in (4-38). Otherwise, the system
response to a step input will be an impulse. This can’t happen.
Example:

du
a0 y  b1  b0u and step change in u (4-41)
dt
2nd order process
General 2nd order ODE:
d2y dy
a 2 + b  y = Ku
dt dt

as 
Chapter 4

2
Laplace Transform:  bs + 1  Y ( s)  KU ( s )

Y ( s) K
G(s)   2
U ( s ) as  bs  1
 b  b 2  4a
2 roots s1, 2 
2a
2
b
1 : real roots
4a
b2
1 : imaginary roots
4a
Examples
1. 2 b 2 16
  1.333  1
3s 2  4 s  1 4a 12

3s 2  4 s  1  (3s  1)( s  1)  3( s  1 )( s  1)
3
t
transforms to e 3
, e t (real roots )
Chapter 4

(no oscillation)
2. 2 b2 1
 1
s2  s  1 4a 4

3 3
s 2  s  1  ( s  0.5  j )( s  0.5  j)
2 2
0.5t 3 0.5t 3
transforms to e cos t, e sin t
2 2
(oscillation)
From Table 3.1, line 17

- bt L 
e sin  t 
( s  b) 2   2
2 2
2
= 2
s  s 1 2  3
Chapter 4

(s + 0.5)   
 2 
Two IMPORTANT properties (L.T.)

A. Multiplicative Rule
Chapter 4

B. Additive Rule
Example 1:
Place sensor for temperature downstream from heated
tank (transport lag)

Distance L for plug flow,


L
Chapter 4

Dead time 
V
V = fluid velocity

T(s) K1
Tank: G1 = =
U(s) 1+ 1s
Ts (s) K 2 e - s
Sensor: G 2 = = K 2  1,  2 is very small
T(s) 1 +  2s
(neglect)
Overall transfer function:
Ts Ts T K 1 K 2 e  s
   G 2  G1 
U T U 1  1s
Linearization of Nonlinear Models
• Required to derive transfer function.
• Good approximation near a given operating point.
• Gain, time constants may change with
• operating point.
Chapter 4

• Use 1st order Taylor series.


dy
 f ( y, u ) (4-60)
dt
f f
f ( y, u )  f ( y, u )  ( y  y)  (u  u ) (4-61)
y y ,u
u y ,u

Subtract steady-state equation from dynamic equation


dy  f f
 y  u (4-62)
dt y s u s
Example 3:
q0: control,
qi: disturbance

dh
A  qi  q0 qi  q0 at s.s.
dt
Chapter 4

dh
Use L.T. A  qi  q0
dt
AsH ( s )  qi ( s )  q0 ( s ) (deviation variables)

suppose q0 is constant

 H(s) 1 pure integrator (ramp) for



AsH ( s )  qi ( s ), 
q  ( s) As step change in qi
i
If q0 is manipulated by a flow control valve,

q0  C v h
nonlinear element
Chapter 4

Figure 2.5

Linear model

R: line and valve resistance

linear ODE : eq. (4-74)


if q0  CV h
dh
A  qi  Cv h
dt
Perform Taylor series of right hand side
Chapter 4

dh 1
A  qi  h

dt R

0.5
R  2h / Cv
Chapter 4
Chapter 4
Chapter 4
Chapter 4

Previous chapter Next chapter

You might also like