0% found this document useful (0 votes)
48 views43 pages

Singular Systems Versus Non-Singular Systems: - A Singular System Has No Solution or Infinitely Many Solution

The document discusses singular and non-singular systems of linear equations. A singular system has no solution or infinitely many solutions, while a non-singular system has a unique solution. It then demonstrates Gaussian elimination to solve a 3x3 system of equations step-by-step, resulting in an upper triangular system that can be solved using backward substitution. Finally, it notes that Gaussian elimination can be generalized to higher dimensions and expressed using matrix multiplication of elementary matrices.

Uploaded by

AppynC
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
48 views43 pages

Singular Systems Versus Non-Singular Systems: - A Singular System Has No Solution or Infinitely Many Solution

The document discusses singular and non-singular systems of linear equations. A singular system has no solution or infinitely many solutions, while a non-singular system has a unique solution. It then demonstrates Gaussian elimination to solve a 3x3 system of equations step-by-step, resulting in an upper triangular system that can be solved using backward substitution. Finally, it notes that Gaussian elimination can be generalized to higher dimensions and expressed using matrix multiplication of elementary matrices.

Uploaded by

AppynC
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 43

Singular Systems versus

Non-Singular Systems
• A singular system has no solution or
infinitely many solution
– Row Picture: two line are parallel or the same
– Column Picture: Two column vectors are co-
linear
• A non-singular system has a unique solution
– Row Picture: two non-parallel lines
– Column Picture: two non-colinear column
vectors
Gaussian Elimination in 3D
2x  4 y  2z  2
4 x  9 y  3z  8
 2 x  3 y  7 z  10
• Using the first pivot to eliminate x from the
next two equations
Gaussian Elimination in 3D
2x  4 y  2z  2
y  z  4
y  5 z  12
• Using the second pivot to eliminate y from
the third equation
Gaussian Elimination in 3D
2x  4 y  2z  2
y  z  4
4z  8
• Using the second pivot to eliminate y from
the third equation
Now We Have a Triangular System
2x  4 y  2z  2
y  z  4
4z  8
• From the last equation, we have
Backward Substitution
2x  4 y  2z  2
y  z  4
z  2
• And substitute z to the first two equations
Backward Substitution
2x  4 y  4  2
y  2  4
z  2
• We can solve y
Backward Substitution
2x  4 y  4  2
y  2
z  2
• Substitute to the first equation
Backward Substitution
2x  8  4  2
y  2
z  2
• We can solve the first equation
Backward Substitution
x  1
y  2
z  2
• We can solve the first equation
Generalization
• How to generalize to higher dimensions?

• What is the complexity of the algorithm?

• Answer:

Express Elimination with Matrices


Step 1
Build Augmented Matrix
2x  4 y  2z  2
4 x  9 y  3z  8
 2 x  3 y  7 z  10
Ax = b

 2 4 2 2
A b   4 9  3 8 
[A b]
 2  3 7 10
Pivot 1: The elimination of column 1
 2 4 2 2
 4 9 3 8 
 
 2  3 7 10
 
 2 4 2 2  2
 0 1 1 4  
   1 
 2  3 7 10

2 4  2 2 
0 1 1 4 
 
0 1 5 12
Pivot 2: The elimination of column 2
2 4  2 2 
0 1 1 4 
 
0 1 5 12
 
 
 
 2 4  2 2 1
0 1 1 4
 
0 0 4 8 

Upper triangular matrix


Backward Substitution 1: from the
last column to the first
Upper triangular matrix
 2 4  2 2  2 4  2 2  2 4  2 2
0 1 1 4 0 1 1 4 0 1 0 2
     
0 0 4 8  0 0 1 2 0 0 1 2

1 0 0  1  2 0 0  2 2 4 0 6
0 1 0 2  0 1 0 2  0 1 0 2
     
0 0 1 2  0 0 1 2  0 0 1 2
Expressing Elimination by
Matrix Multiplication
Elementary or Elimination Matrix
Ei , j
• The elementary or elimination matrix Ei , j
That subtracts a multiple l of row j from row i
can be obtained from the identity matrix I
by adding (-l) in the i,j position
 1 0 0
E3,1   0 1 0
 l 0 1
Elementary or Elimination Matrix
 a1,1 a1, 2 a1,3   1 0 0  a1,1 a1, 2 a1,3 
     
E3,1 a2,1 a2, 2 a2,3    0 1 0 a2,1 a2, 2 a2,3 
 a3,1 a3, 2 a3,3   l 0 1  a3,1 a3, 2 a3,3 

 a1,1 a1, 2 a1,3 


 
  a2,1 a2 , 2 a2 , 3 
 la1,1  a3,1  la1, 2  a3, 2  la1,3  a3,3 
Pivot 1: The elimination of column 1
   2 4 2 2 2 4  2 2 
 2  4 9 3 8  0 1 1 4 
     
 1   2  3 7 10 0 1 5 12
Elimination matrix
 1 0 0  2 4  2 2   2 4 2 2
  2 1 0  4 9  3 8    0 1 1 4
    
 0 0 1  2  3 7 10  2  3 7 10

1 0 0  2 4  2 2  2 4  2 2 
0 1 0   0 1 1 4    0 1 1 4 
    
1 0 1  2  3 7 10 0 1 5 12
The Product of Elimination Matrices
1 0 0  1 0 0  1 0 0
0 1 0    2 1 0     2 1 0 
    
1 0 1  0 0 1  1 0 1

1 0 0  1 0 0  1 0 0
0 1 0    2 1 0     2 1 0 
    
0  1 1  1 0 1  1  1 1
Elimination by Matrix Multiplication

 1 0 0  2 4  2 2   2 4  2 2
  2 1 0  4 9  3 8   0 1 1 4
    
 1  1 1  2  3 7 10 0 0 4 8
Linear Systems in Higher Dimensions

1 1 1 1 0
1 2 3 4   2 
 x 
1 3 6 10    5
   
1 4 10 20  9
Linear Systems in Higher Dimensions
1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 0
1 2 3 4  2 0 1 2 3  2
 
1 3 6 10  5 0 2 5 9  5
   
1 4 10 20  9 0 3 9 19  9 

1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 0
0 3  2 0
 1 2
 1 2 3  2
0 0 3 6  3 0 0 3 6  3
   
0 0 0 4 0 0 0 3 10  3
Linear Systems in Higher Dimensions
1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 0
0 1 1 1 0 0
1 2 3  2 0 3  2 0
  1 2
 1 2 0  2
0 0 3 6  3 0 0 3 6  3
  0 0 3 0  3
 
0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 1 0  
0 0 0 1 0

1 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 0
0 0 0  2
 1 0 0 0  0
 1 0 0 0   1 2
0 0 1 0  1 0 0 1 0  1 0 0 1 0  1
     
0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0
Booking with Elimination Matrices
10
 00
1
 11101 1110

110
0
1 234
2 0 123
2
   

101
0
1 3610

5 0 259
5
   

1001
1
 410
20
9
0 3919
9

1 0 0 0  1 1 1 1 0  1 1 1 1 0 
0 1 0 0  0 1 2 3  2   0 1 2 3  2 
 
0  2 1 0  0 2 5 9  5  0 0 3 6  3
    
0  3 0 1  0 3 9 19  9   0 0 3 10  3 

1 0 0 0  1 1 1 1 0  1 1 1 1 0 
0 1 0 0  0 1 2 3  2   0 1 2 3  2 
 
0 0 1 0  0 0 3 6  3  0 0 3 6  3
    
0 0  1 1  0 0 3 10  3   0 0 0 4 0 
Multiplying Elimination Matrices

1 0 0 0  1 1 1 10  1 1 1 1 0 
 1 1 0 0  1 2 3 4  2   0 1 2 3  2 
 
 1  2 1 0  1 3 6 10  5   0 0 3 6  3
    
 1  3  1 1  1 4 10 20  9   0 0 0 4 0 
Inverse Matrices
• In 1 dimension

3x  9
x  3 9  3
1

3 3  33  1
1 1
Inverse Matrices
• In high dimensions

Ax  b
Can we write?
1
xA b
1
Is there a matrix A such that?
1 1
A A  AA  I
Inverse Matrices
• In 1 dimension
1
0 does not exist
1
a exists iff a  0
• In higher dimensions
1
When does A not exist?
singular matrices!!!
Some Special Matrices and
Their Inverses
I 1  I

1
d1  1 / d1 
     
   
 d n   1 / d n 
Inverses in Two Dimensions
1
a b  1  d  b
 c d   ad  bc  c a 
   
Proof:
1  d  b  a b  1 ad  bc 0 
       I
ad  bc  c a   c d  ad  bc  0 ad  bc

a b  1  d  b   1 ad  bc 0 
 c d  ad  bc  c a    ad  bc  0 
ad  bc 
I
    
Uniqueness of Inverse Matrices
BA  I and AC  I then
B  C

Proof :
B  BI  B AC   BAC  BAC  IC  C
Inverse and Linear System
if A is invertible then
Ax  b
has a unique solution given by
1
A b

Proof :
1 1
A Ax  A b
Ix  A1b
x  A1b
Inverse and Linear System
• Therefore, the inverse of A exists if and
only if elimination produces n non-zero
pivots (row exchanges allowed)
Inverse, Singular Matrix and
Degeneracy
Suppose there is a nonzero vector x such that Ax =
0 [column vectors of A co-linear] then A cannot
have an inverse
Proof :
1 1
A Ax  A 0
x0
Contradiction:
So if A is invertible, then Ax =0 can only have
the zero solution x=0
One More Property
AB  1
B A 1 1

Proof
 
B 1 A1  AB   B 1 A1 A B  B 1 B  I
So

ABC  1 1
C B A 1 1
Gauss-Jordan Elimination for
Computing A -1

• 1D
1
ax  1 implies x  a
• 2D
 a11 a12   x1  1  a11 a12   y1  0
a a   x   0 and a a   y   1
 21 22   2     21 22   2   
then
 a11 a12   x1 y1  1 0
 a a   x y   0 1 
 21 22   2 2   
Gauss-Jordan Elimination for
Computing A -1

• 3D
 a11 a12 a13   x  1  a11 a12 a13   y  0
a a a   1   0 , a a a   1   1  and
 21 22 23   x2     21 22 23   y2   
a31 a32 a33   x3  0  a31 a32 a33   y3  0
 a11 a12 a13   z  0
 a a a   z 1   0 
 21 22 23   2   
 a31 a32 a33   z3  1 
then
 a11 a12 a13   x1 y1 z1  1 0 0
 a a a   x y z   0 1 0 
 21 22 23   2 2 2   
 a31 a32 a33   x3 y3 z3  0 0 1
Gauss-Jordan Elimination for
Computing A -1

• 3D: Solving three linear equations defined


by A simultaneously

• n dimensions: Solving n linear equations


defined by A simultaneously

A 1
A I   I , A 1

Example:Gauss-Jordan
Elimination for Computing A -1

 2 1 0  1 0 0
 1 2  1 X  0 1 0
   
 0  1 2  0 0 1
• Make a Big Augmented Matrix
 2  1 0 1 0 0
 
  1 2  1 0 1 0 
 0  1 2 0 0 1
Example:Gauss-Jordan
Elimination for Computing A -1

 2  1 0 1 0 0 2  1 0 1 0 0
   
  1 2  1 0 1 0 0 3 / 2   1 1 / 2  1 0
 0  1 2 0 0 1 0  1 2 0 0 1

2  1 0 1 0 0
 
0 3 / 2  1 1 / 2 1 0
0 0 4 / 3 1 / 3 2 / 3 1
Example:Gauss-Jordan
Elimination for Computing A -1
2  1 0 1 0 0
 
 0 3 / 2   1 1 / 2  1 0 
0 0 4 / 3 1 / 3 2 / 3 1

2  1 0 1 0 0 
 
 0 3 / 2  0 3 / 4  3 / 2  3 / 4 
0 0 4 / 3 1 / 3 2 / 3 1 

2 0 0 3 / 2 1 1 / 2
 
0 3 / 2 0 3 / 4 3 / 2 3 / 4 
0 0 4 / 3 1 / 3 2 / 3 1 
Example:Gauss-Jordan
Elimination for Computing A -1

2 0 0 3 / 2 1 1 / 2
 
0 3 / 2  0 3 / 4 3 / 2 3 / 4
0 0 4 / 3 1 / 3 2 / 3 1 

2 0 0 3 / 4 1 / 2 1 / 4
 
0 1 0 1 / 2  1 1 / 2
0 0 1 1 / 4  1 / 2 3 / 4

You might also like