Scribd
Upload
27 views

Unit 2 - Session 11

The document discusses predictive parsing and LL(1) grammars. It covers how to construct a predictive parsing table by eliminating left recursion, left factoring a grammar, and computing FIRST and FOLLOW sets. Examples are provided to demonstrate constructing predictive parsing tables for different grammars. The key characteristics of LL(1) grammars are that they cannot be left recursive or ambiguous, and the FIRST sets of productions must be disjoint for the grammar to be LL(1).

Uploaded by

CALVIN DEVADOSS (RA1911033010130)
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
27 views

Unit 2 - Session 11

The document discusses predictive parsing and LL(1) grammars. It covers how to construct a predictive parsing table by eliminating left recursion, left factoring a grammar, and computing FIRST and FOLLOW sets. Examples are provided to demonstrate constructing predictive parsing tables for different grammars. The key characteristics of LL(1) grammars are that they cannot be left recursive or ambiguous, and the FIRST sets of productions must be disjoint for the grammar to be LL(1).

Uploaded by

CALVIN DEVADOSS (RA1911033010130)
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 16

18CSC304J

COMPILER DESIGN

UNIT 2
SESSION 11
Topics that will be covered in this Session

• Construction of Predictive Parsing Table


• Predictive Parsers LL(1) Grammars
CONSTRUCTION OF
PREDICTIVE PARSING TABLE
Predictive Parsers

Predictive Parsers

• Predictive Parsers are recursive-descent parsers that need no backtracking

• Predictive parsers can be constructed for a class of grammars called LL(1)

• The first L in LL(1) stands for scanning the input from left to right

• The second L stands for producing a leftmost derivation

• The 1 stands for using one input symbol of lookahead at each step to make parsing action
decisions
Steps in Constructing Predictive Parsers

1. Eliminate left recursion from the grammar

2. Left factor the grammar

3. Compute the functions FIRST and FOLLLOW for all the non-terminals in the grammar

4. Construct predictive parsing table

5. Apply predictive parsing algorithm to parse the input string


Constructing Predictive Parsing Table
Constructing Predictive Parsing Table – Example 1
Construct Predictive Parsing table for the grammar

E→E+T|T

T→T*F|F

F → ( E ) | id

Step 1 : Eliminate Left Recursion

E → T E′

E′ → + T E′ | ε

T → F T′

T′ → * F T′ | ε

F → ( E ) | id

Step 2 : Left Factor the grammar

There is no need for left factoring in this grammar as there are no common prefixes
Constructing Predictive Parsing Table – Example 1 – cont..
Now the grammar is

E → T E′

E′ → + T E′ | ε

T → F T′

T′ → * F T′ | ε

F → ( E ) | id

Step 3 : Compute FIRST and FOLLOW for all the non-terminals


Constructing Predictive Parsing Table – Example 1 – cont..
Step 4 : Construct predictive parsing table

The grammar after eliminating left recursion is

E → T E′

E′ → + T E′

E′ → ε

T → F T′

T′ → * F T′

T′ → ε

F→(E)

F → id
Example 2
Construct predictive parsing table for the grammar given below:

S→(L)|a

L→L,S|S

Step 1 : Eliminate Left Recursion

S→(L)|a

L → ( L ) L′ | a L′

L′ → , S L′ | ε

Step 2 : Left Factor the grammar

There is no need for left factoring in this grammar as there are no common prefixes
Example 2 – cont..
Now the grammar is

S→(L)|a

L → ( L ) L′ | a L′

L′ → , S L′ | ε

Step 3 : Compute FIRST and FOLLOW for all the non-terminals

FIRST(S) = { ( , a } FOLLOW(S) = { $ , , , ) }

FIRST(L) = { ( , a } FOLLOW(L) = { ) }

FIRST(L′) = { , , ε } FOLLOW(L′) = { ) }
Example 2 – cont..
Step 4 : Construct predictive parsing table

Now the grammar is

S→(L)

S→a

L → ( L ) L′

L → a L′
( ) a , $
L′ → , S L′
S S→(L) S→a
L′ → ε
L L → ( L ) L′ L → a L′
L′ L′ → ε L′ → , S L′
Example 3
Construct predictive parsing table for the grammar given below:

S → iEtSS′ | a

S′ → eS | ε

E→b

Step 1 : Eliminate Left Recursion

There is no left recursion

Step 2 : Left Factor the grammar

There is no need for left factoring in this grammar as there are no common prefixes

Step 3 : Compute FIRST and FOLLOW for all the non-terminals

FIRST(S) = { i , a } FOLLOW(S) = { $ , e }

FIRST(S′) = { e , ε } FOLLOW(S′) = { $ , e }

FIRST(E) = { b } FOLLOW(E) = { t }
Example 3
The grammar is Step 4 : Construct predictive parsing table

S → iEtSS′ FIRST(S) = { i , a } FOLLOW(S) = { $ , e }

S→a FIRST(S′) = { e , ε } FOLLOW(S′) = { $ , e }

S′ → eS FIRST(E) = { b } FOLLOW(E) = { t }

S′ → ε i t a b e $
E→b S S → iEtSS′ S→a
S′ S′ → eS S′ → ε
S′ → ε
E E→b

In the parsing table, the entry for M[S′,e] contains two productions. This is
because the grammar is ambiguous. Hence, the grammar is not LL(1)
PREDICTIVE PARSERS
LL(1) GRAMMARS
LL(1) Grammars
• The class of LL(1) grammars is rich enough to cover most programming constructs

• Care should be taken in writing suitable grammar for the source language

• No left recursive or ambiguous grammar can be LL(1)

• A grammar G is LL(1) if and only if whenever A →  | β are two distinct productions of G, the
following conditions hold:

1. For no terminal a do both α and β derive strings beginning with a

2. At most one of α and β can derive the empty string

3. If then  does not derive any string beginning with a terminal in FOLLOW(A).
Likewise, if then β does not derive any string beginning with a terminal in
FOLLOW(A).

• The first two conditions are equivalent to the statement that FIRST() and FIRST(β) are disjoint
sets

• The third condition is equivalent to stating that if ε is in FIRST(β), then FIRST() and FOLLOW(A)
are disjoint sets, and likewise if ε is in FIRST()

You might also like