Transformer

Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 73

Electrical Machine-I

EEE-2105 Electrical Machine-I

Recommended Books:
1.Stephen J. Chapman : Electric Machinery and Power System Fundamentals
2.J. Rosenblatt & M. H. Friedman : Direct and Alternating Current
Machinery
3.Charles I Hubert : Electric Machines: Theory, Operating Applications, and
Controls
4.B.L. Thereja, A.K. Thereja : A Textbook of Electrical Technology, Volume
II
Transformer
A transformer is a device that converts one AC voltage to another AC voltage at
the same frequency.
It consists of one or more coil(s) of wire wrapped around a common
ferromagnetic core. These coils are usually not connected electrically together.
However, they are connected through the common magnetic flux confined to the
core.

Assuming that the transformer has at least two windings, one of them
(primary) is connected to a source of AC power; the other (secondary) is
connected to the loads.
Types and construction
Power transformers
Core form Shell form

Windings are wrapped around two Windings are wrapped around the
sides of a laminated square core. center leg of a laminated core.

Usually, windings are wrapped on top of each other to decrease flux leakage
and, therefore, increase efficiency.
Types and construction
Types and construction

Power transformers used in power distribution systems are sometimes


referred as follows:

A power transformer connected to the output of a generator and used to step


its voltage up to the transmission level (110 kV and higher) is called a unit
transformer.
A transformer used at a substation to step the voltage from the transmission
level down to the distribution level (2.3 … 34.5 kV) is called a substation
transformer.
A transformer converting the distribution voltage down to the final level (110
V, 220 V, etc.) is called a distribution transformer.

In addition to power transformers, other types of transformers are used.


Ideal transformer

We consider a lossless transformer


with an input (primary) winding
having Np turns and a secondary
winding of Ns turns.
The relationship between the voltage
applied to the primary winding vp(t)
and the voltage produced on the
secondary winding vs(t) is

v p (t ) Np
 a (4.8.1)
vs (t ) Ns

Here a is the turn ratio of the transformer.


Ideal transformer

The relationship between the primary ip(t) and secondary is(t) currents is

i p (t ) 1
 (4.9.1)
is (t ) a

In the phasor notation:


Vp
a (4.9.2)
Vs

Ip 1
 (4.9.3)
Is a

The phase angles of primary and secondary voltages are the same. The phase
angles of primary and secondary currents are the same also. The ideal
transformer changes magnitudes of voltages and currents but not their angles.
Ideal transformer

One winding’s terminal is usually marked by a dot


used to determine the polarity of voltages and
currents.

If the voltage is positive at the dotted end of the primary winding at some
moment of time, the voltage at the dotted end of the secondary winding will also
be positive at the same time instance.
If the primary current flows into the dotted end of the primary winding, the
secondary current will flow out of the dotted end of the secondary winding.
Power in an ideal transformer

Assuming that p and s are the angles between voltages and currents on the
primary and secondary windings respectively, the power supplied to the
transformer by the primary circuit is:

Pin  V p I p cos  p (4.11.1)

The power supplied to the output circuits is

Pout  Vs I s cos  s (4.11.2)

Since ideal transformers do not affect angles between voltages and currents:

 p  s   (4.11.3)

Both windings of an ideal transformer have the same power factor.


Power in an ideal transformer

Since for an ideal transformer the following holds:


Vp
Vs  ;I s  aI p (4.12.1)
a

Therefore: Vp
Pout  Vs I s cos   aI p cos   V p I p cos   Pin (4.12.2)
a
The output power of an ideal transformer equals to its input power – to be
expected since assumed no loss. Similarly, for reactive and apparent powers:

Qout  Vs I s sin   V p I p sin   Qin (4.12.3)

Sout  Vs I s  V p I p  Sin (4.12.4)


Impedance transformation

The impedance is defined as a following ratio of phasors:


Z L  VL I L (4.13.1)

A transformer changes voltages and currents and, therefore, an apparent


impedance of the load that is given by
Z L  Vs I s (4.13.2)

The apparent impedance of the primary


circuit is:
Z L '  Vp I p (4.13.3)

which is
Vp aVs 2 Vs
ZL '   a  a2Z L (4.13.4)
I p Is a Is
It is possible to match magnitudes of impedances (load and a transmission line) by
selecting a transformer with the proper turn ratio.
Analysis of circuits containing
ideal transformers
A simple method to analyze a circuit containing an ideal transformer is by
replacing the portion of the circuit on one side of the transformer by an
equivalent circuit with the same terminal characteristics.

Next, we exclude the transformer from the circuit and solve it for voltages
and currents.

The solutions obtained for the portion of the circuit that was not replaced
will be the correct values of voltages and currents of the original circuit.

Finally, the voltages and currents on the other side of the transformer (in
the original circuit) can be found by considering the transformer’s turn ratio.

This process is called referring of transformer’s sides.


Analysis of circuits containing
ideal transformers: Example
Example 4.1: A single-phase power system consists of a 480-V 60-Hz generator
that is connected to the load Zload = 4 + j3  through the transmission line with
Zline = 0.18 + j0.24 . a) What is the voltage at the load? What are the
transmission line losses? b) If a 1:10 step up transformer and a 10:1 step down
transformer are placed at the generator and the load ends of the transmission
line respectively, what are the new load voltage and the new transmission line
losses?
a) Here:
V
I G  I line  I load 
Zline  Zload
4800

0.18  j 0.24  4  j 3
4800
  90.8  37.8 A
5.2937.8
Analysis of circuits containing
ideal transformers: Example
Therefore, the load voltage:
Vload  I load Zload   90.8  37.8  (4  j3)   90.8  37.8   536.9   454  0.9V

The line losses are:


Ploss  I line
2
Rline  90.82  0.18  1484W
b) We will
1)eliminate transformer T2
by referring the load over to
the transmission line’s
voltage level.
2)Eliminate transformer T1
by referring the
transmission line’s
elements and the equivalent load at the transmission line’s voltage over to the
source side.
Analysis of circuits containing
ideal transformers: Example
The load impedance when referred to the transmission line (while the
transformer T2 is eliminated) is:
2
 10 
'
Zload  a22 Zload     4  j 3  400  j 300
1
The total impedance on the
transmission line level is
Z eq  Z line  Z load
'

 400.18  j 300.24
 500.336.88

The total impedance is now referred across T1 to the source’s voltage level:
2
1
Z 'eq  a12 Zeq     500.336.88   5.00336.88
 10 
Analysis of circuits containing
ideal transformers: Example
The generator’s current is
V 4800
IG  
Z 'eq 5.00336.88
 95.94  36.88 A
Knowing transformers’ turn ratios, we
can determine line and load currents:
I line  a1I G  0.1  95.94  36.88   9.594  36.88 A
I load  a2I line  10   9.594  36.88   95.94  36.88 A
Therefore, the load voltage is:
Vload  Iload Zload   95.94  36.88   5  36.87   479.7  0.01V
The losses in the line are: Ploss  I line
2
Rline  9.5942  0.18  16.7W
Note: transmission line losses are reduced by a factor nearly 90, the load voltage is
much closer to the generator’s voltage – effects of increasing the line’s voltage.
The current ratio on a transformer

If a load is connected to the secondary coil, there will be a current flowing


through it.

A current flowing into the dotted end


of a winding produces a positive
magnetomotive force F:
Fp  N p i p (4.26.1)

Fs  N s is (4.26.2)

The net magnetomotive force in the core


Fnet  N p i p  N s is   (4.26.3)

where  is the reluctance of the transformer core. For well-designed transformer


cores, the reluctance is very small if the core is not saturated. Therefore:

Fnet  N p i p  N s is  0 (4.26.4)
The current ratio on a transformer

The last approximation is valid for well-designed unsaturated cores. Therefore:


ip Ns 1
N p i p  N s is    (4.27.1)
is Np a
An ideal transformer (unlike the real one) can be
characterized as follows:

1.The core has no hysteresis or eddy currents.


2.The magnetization curve is
3.The leakage flux in the core is zero.
Magnetization curve of
4.The resistance of the windings is zero. an ideal transformer
The transformer’s equivalent circuit

To model a real transformer accurately, we need to account for the


following losses:

1.Copper losses – resistive heating in the windings: I2R.


2.Eddy current losses – resistive heating in the core: proportional to the
square of voltage applied to the transformer.
3.Hysteresis losses – energy needed to rearrange magnetic domains in
the core: nonlinear function of the voltage applied to the transformer.
4.Leakage flux – flux that escapes from the core and flux that passes
through one winding only.
The exact equivalent circuit of a
real transformer
Cooper losses are modeled
by the resistors Rp and Rs.
Leakage flux in a primary
winding produces the
voltage:
dLp
eLp (t )  N p (4.29.1)
dt
Since much of the leakage flux pass through air, and air has a constant reluctance
that is much higher than the core reluctance, the primary coil’s leakage flux is:

Lp  P N p i p (4.29.2)
permeance of flux path
Therefore:
d di p
eLp (t )  N p  P N p i p   N pP
2
(4.29.3)
dt dt
The exact equivalent circuit of a
real transformer
Recognizing that the self-inductance of the primary coil is
Lp  N p2P (4.30.1)

The induced voltages are:

di p
Primary coil: eLp (t )  L p (4.30.2)
dt
dis
Secondary coil: eLs (t )  Ls (4.30.3)
dt
The leakage flux can be modeled by primary and secondary inductors.
The magnetization current can be modeled by a reactance XM connected across
the primary voltage source.
The core-loss current can be modeled by a resistance RC connected across the
primary voltage source.
Both currents are nonlinear; therefore, XM and RC are just approximations.
The exact equivalent circuit of a real
transformer

The transformer’s
equivalent circuit
However, the exact circuit is not
very practical.

Therefore, the equivalent circuit is usually


referred to the primary side or the secondary
side of the transformer.

Equivalent circuit of the transformer


referred to its primary side.

Equivalent circuit of the transformer


referred to its secondary side.
Approximate equivalent circuit of a
transformer
For many practical applications,
approximate models of
transformers are used.

Referred to the primary side.

Referred to the secondary side.

Without an excitation branch


referred to the primary side.

The values of components of the


transformer model can be Without an excitation branch
determined experimentally by an referred to the secondary side.
open-circuit test or by a short-circuit test.
Determining the values of components

The open-circuit test.


Full line voltage is applied to the primary
side of the transformer. The input voltage,
current, and power are measured.

From this information, the power factor of the input current and the magnitude and
the angle of the excitation impedance can be determined.
To evaluate RC and XM, we determine the conductance of the core-loss resistor is:
1
GC  (4.33.1)
RC
The susceptance of the magnetizing inductor is:
1
BM  (4.33.2)
XM
Determining the values of components

Since both elements are in parallel, their admittances add. Therefore, the total
excitation admittance is:
1 1
YE  GC  jBM  j (4.34.1)
RC XM
The magnitude of the excitation admittance in the open-circuit test is:
I oc
YE  (4.34.2)
Voc
The angle of the admittance in the open-circuit test can be found from the circuit
power factor (PF):
Poc
cos   PF  (4.34.3)
Voc I oc
Determining the values of components

In real transformers, the power factor is always lagging, so the angle of the current
always lags the angle of the voltage by  degrees. The admittance is:
I oc I oc
YE       cos 1 PF (4.35.1)
Voc Voc

Therefore, it is possible to determine values of RC and XM in the open-circuit test.


Determining the values of components

The short-circuit test.


Fairly low input voltage is applied to the
primary side of the transformer. This voltage
is adjusted until the current in the secondary
winding equals to its rated value.
The input voltage, current, and power are again measured.
Since the input voltage is low, the current flowing through the excitation branch is
negligible; therefore, all the voltage drop in the transformer is due to the series
elements in the circuit. The magnitude of the series impedance referred to the
primary side of the transformer is:
VSC
Z SE  (4.36.1)
I SC
The power factor of the current is given by:
PSC
PF  cos   (4.36.2)
VSC I SC
Determining the values of components

Therefore:
VSC 0 VSC
Z SE     (4.37.1)
I SC     I SC
Since the serial impedance ZSE is equal to
Z SE  Req  jX eq (4.37.2)

Z SE   R p  a 2 RS   j  X p  a 2 X S  (4.37.3)

it is possible to determine the total series impedance referred to the primary side
of the transformer. However, there is no easy way to split the series impedance
into primary and secondary components.
The same tests can be performed on the secondary side of the transformer. The
results will yield the equivalent circuit impedances referred to the secondary side
of the transformer.
Determining the values of components:
Example
Example 4.2: We need to determine the equivalent circuit impedances of a 20
kVA, 8000/240 V, 60 Hz transformer. The open-circuit and short-circuit tests led to
the following data:
VOC = 8000 V VSC = 489 V
IOC = 0.214 A ISC = 2.5 A
POC = 400 W PSC = 240 W

The power factor during the open-circuit test is


POC 400
PF  cos     0.234lagging
VOC I OC 8000  0.214
The excitation admittance is
IOC 1 0.214 1 1 1
YE    cos PF    cos 0.234  0.0000063  j 0.0000261   j
VOC 8000 RC XM
Determining the values of components:
Example
1 1
Therefore: RC   159k ; X M   38.3k 
0.0000063 0.0000261
The power factor during the short-circuit test is
PSC 240
PF  cos     0.196lagging
VSC I SC 489  2.5
The series impedance is given by
VSC 489
Z SE   cos 1 PF  78.7
I SC 2.5
 38.4  j192
Therefore:
Req  38.3; X eq  192
The equivalent circuit
Voltage regulation and efficiency

Since a real transformer contains series impedances, the transformer’s output


voltage varies with the load even if the input voltage is constant. To compare
transformers in this respect, the quantity called a full-load voltage regulation (VR)
is defined as follows:

Vs ,nl  Vs , fl Vp a  Vs , fl
VR  100%  100% (4.52.1)
Vs , fl Vs , fl
In a per-unit system:
V p , pu  Vs , fl , pu
VR  100% (4.52.2)
Vs , fl , pu

Where Vs,nl and Vs,fl are the secondary no load and full load voltages.
Note, the VR of an ideal transformer is zero.
The transformer phasor diagram

To determine the VR of a transformer, it is necessary to understand the voltage


drops within it. Usually, the effects of the excitation branch on transformer VR can
be ignored and, therefore, only the series impedances need to be considered. The
VR depends on the magnitude of the impedances and on the current phase angle.
A phasor diagram is often used in the VR determinations. The phasor voltage Vs is
assumed to be at 00 and all other voltages and currents are compared to it.

Considering the diagram and by applying the


Kirchhoff’s voltage law, the primary voltage is:
Vp
 Vs  Req I s  jX eq I s (4.53.1)
a
A transformer phasor diagram is a graphical
representation of this equation.
The transformer phasor diagram

A transformer operating at a lagging power factor:

It is seen that Vp/a > Vs, VR > 0

A transformer operating at
a unity power factor:
It is seen that VR > 0

A transformer operating at a
leading power factor:
If the secondary current is leading,
the secondary voltage can be higher
than the referred primary voltage;
VR < 0.
The transformer efficiency

The efficiency of a transformer is defined as:


Pout Pout
 100%  100% (4.55.1)
Pin Pout  Ploss
Note: the same equation describes the efficiency of motors and generators.
Considering the transformer equivalent circuit, we notice three types of losses:
1. Copper (I2R) losses – are accounted for by the series resistance
2. Hysteresis losses – are accounted for by the resistor Rc.
3. Eddy current losses – are accounted for by the resistor Rc.
Since the output power is Pout  Vs I s cos  s (4.55.2)

The transformer efficiency is


Vs I s cos 
 100% (4.55.3)
PCu  Pcore  Vs I s cos 
The transformer efficiency: Example

Example 4.5: A 15 kVA, 2300/230 V transformer was tested to by open-circuit and


closed-circuit tests. The following data was obtained:

VOC = 2300 V VSC = 47 V


IOC = 0.21 A ISC = 6.0 A
POC = 50 W PSC = 160 W

a. Find the equivalent circuit of this transformer referred to the high-voltage side.
b. Find the equivalent circuit of this transformer referred to the low-voltage side.
c. Calculate the full-load voltage regulation at 0.8 lagging power factor, at 1.0
power factor, and at 0.8 leading power factor.
d. Plot the voltage regulation as load is increased from no load to full load at
power factors of 0.8 lagging, 1.0, and 0.8 leading.
e. What is the efficiency of the transformer at full load with a power factor of 0.8
lagging?
The transformer efficiency: Example

a. The excitation branch values of the equivalent circuit can be determined as:
Poc 50
 oc  cos 1  cos 1  84
Voc I oc 2300  0.21
The excitation admittance is:
I oc 0.21
YE    84    84  0.0000095  j 0.0000908S
Voc 2300
The elements of the excitation branch referred to the primary side are:
1
Rc   105k 
0.0000095
1
XM   11k 
0.0000908
The transformer efficiency: Example

From the short-circuit test data, the short-circuit impedance angle is


PSC 160
 SC  cos 1  cos 1  55.4
VSC I SC 47  6
The equivalent series impedance is thus
VSC 47
Z SE   SC  55.4  4.45  j 6.45
I SC 6
The series elements referred to
the primary winding are:

Req  4.45; X eq  6.45

The equivalent circuit


The transformer efficiency: Example

b. To find the equivalent circuit referred to the low-voltage side, we need to divide
the impedance by a2. Since a = 10, the values will be:

RC  1050 X M  110 Req  0.0445 X eq  0.0645


The equivalent circuit will be
The transformer efficiency: Example

c. The full-load current on the secondary side of the transformer is


S rated 15000
I S ,rated    65.2 A
VS ,rated 230
Vp
Since:  VS  Req I S  jX eq I S
a
1
At PF = 0.8 lagging, current I s  65.2  cos (0.8)  65.2  36.9 A
Vp
and  2300  0.0445   65.2  36.9   j 0.0645   65.2  36.9   234.850.40V
a
The resulting voltage regulation is, therefore:
V p a  VS , fl
VR  100%
VS , fl
234.85  230
 100%
230
 2.1%
The transformer efficiency: Example

At PF = 1.0, current I s  65.2 cos 1 (1.0)  65.20 A


Vp
and  2300  0.0445   65.20   j 0.0645   65.20   232.941.04V
a

The resulting voltage regulation is, therefore:


V p a  VS , fl 232.94  230
VR  100%  100%  1.28%
VS , fl 230
The transformer efficiency: Example

At PF = 0.8 leading, current I s  65.2 cos 1 (0.8)  65.236.9 A


Vp
and  2300  0.0445   65.236.9   j 0.0645   65.236.9   229.851.27V
a

The resulting voltage regulation is, therefore:


V p a  VS , fl 229.85  230
VR  100%  100%  0.062%
VS , fl 230
The transformer efficiency: Example

Similar computations can be


repeated for different values
of load current. As a result,
we can plot the voltage
regulation as a function of
load current for the three
Power Factors.
The transformer efficiency: Example

e. To find the efficiency of the transformer, first calculate its losses.


The copper losses are:
PCu  I S2 Req  65.22  0.0445  189W
The core losses are:
 Vp a 
2
234.852
Pcore    52.5W
RC 1050
The output power of the transformer at the given Power Factor is:
Pout  VS I S cos   230  65.2  cos 36.9  12000W
Therefore, the efficiency of the transformer is

Pout
 100%  98.03%
PCu  Pcore  Pout
Transformer taps and voltage regulation

We assumed before that the transformer turns ratio is a fixed (constant) for the
given transformer. Frequently, distribution transformers have a series of taps in
the windings to permit small changes in their turns ratio. Typically, transformers
may have 4 taps in addition to the nominal setting with spacing of 2.5 % of full-
load voltage. Therefore, adjustments up to 5 % above or below the nominal
voltage rating of the transformer are possible.

Example 4.6: A 500 kVA, 13 200/480 V transformer has four 2.5 % taps on its primary
winding. What are the transformer’s voltage ratios at each tap setting?

+ 5.0% tap 13 860/480 V


+ 2.5% tap 13 530/480 V
Nominal rating 13 200/480 V
- 2.5% tap 12 870/480 V
- 5.0% tap 12 540/480 V
Transformer taps and voltage regulation

Taps allow adjustment of the transformer in the field to accommodate for local
voltage variations.
Sometimes, transformers are used on a power line, whose voltage varies widely
with the load (due to high line impedance, for instance). Normal loads need fairly
constant input voltage though…
One possible solution to this problem is to use a special transformer called a tap
changing under load (TCUL) transformer or voltage regulator. TCUL is a
transformer with the ability to change taps while power is connected to it. A voltage
regulator is a TCUL with build-in voltage sensing circuitry that automatically
changes taps to keep the system voltage constant.
These “self-adjusting” transformers are very common in modern power systems.
The autotransformer

Sometimes, it is desirable to change the voltage by a small amount (for


instance, when the consumer is far away from the generator and it is needed to
raise the voltage to compensate for voltage drops).
In such situations, it would be expensive to wind a transformer with two windings
of approximately equal number of turns. An autotransformer (a transformer with
only one winding) is used instead.
Diagrams of step-up and step-down autotransformers:

Series Series
winding winding

Common Common
winding winding

Output (up) or input (down) voltage is a sum of voltages across common and series windings.
The autotransformer
Since the autotransformer’s coils are physically connected, a different terminology
is used for autotransformers:
The voltage across the common winding is called a common voltage VC, and the
current through this coil is called a common current IC. The voltage across the
series winding is called a series voltage VSE, and the current through that coil is
called a series current ISE.
The voltage and current on the low-voltage side are called VL and IL; the voltage
and current on the high-voltage side are called VH and IH.
For the autotransformers: VC N
 C (4.68.1)
VSE N SE
N C I C  N SE I SE (4.68.2)

VL  VC I L  I C  I SE (4.68.3)

VH  VC  VSE I H  I SE (4.68.4)
Voltage and Current relationships in
an Autotransformer
Combining (4.68.1) through (4.68.4), for the high-side voltage, we arrive at
N SE N SE
VH  VC  VC  VL  VL (4.69.1)
NC NC

VL NC
Therefore:  (4.69.2)
VH N C  N SE

The current relationship will be:


N SE N
I L  I SE  I SE  I H  SE I H (4.69.3)
NC NC

I L N C  N SE
Therefore:  (4.69.4)
IH NC
The apparent power advantage

Not all the power traveling from the primary to the secondary winding of the
autotransformer goes through the windings. As a result, an autotransformer can
handle much power than the conventional transformer (with the same windings).
Considering a step-up autotransformer, the apparent input and output powers are:
Sin  VL I L (4.70.1)

Sout  VH I H (4.70.2)

It is easy to show that Sin  Sout  S IO (4.70.3)

where SIO is the input and output apparent powers of the autotransformer.
However, the apparent power in the autotransformer’s winding is
SW  VC I C  VSE I SE (4.70.4)

Which is: SW  VL  I L  I H   VL I L  VL I H
NC N SE
 VL I L  VL I L  S IO (4.70.5)
N SE  NC N SE  NC
The apparent power advantage
Therefore, the ratio of the apparent power in the primary and secondary of the
autotransformer to the apparent power actually traveling through its windings is

S IO N SE  NC
 (4.71.1)
SW N SE

The last equation described the apparent power rating advantage of


an autotransformer over a conventional transformer.
SW is the apparent power actually passing through the windings. The rest passes
from primary to secondary parts without being coupled through the windings.
Note that the smaller the series winding, the greater the advantage!
The apparent power advantage
For example, a 5 MVA autotransformer that connects a 110 kV system to a 138 kV
system would have a turns ratio (common to series) 110:28. Such an
autotransformer would actually have windings rated at:

N SE 28
SW  S IO  5  1.015MVA
N SE  N C 28  110
Therefore, the autotransformer would have windings rated at slightly over 1 MVA
instead of 5 MVA, which makes is 5 times smaller and, therefore, considerably less
expensive.
However, the construction of autotransformers is usually slightly different. In
particular, the insulation on the smaller coil (the series winding) of the
autotransformer is made as strong as the insulation on the larger coil to withstand
the full output voltage.
The primary disadvantage of an autotransformer is that there is a direct
physical connection between its primary and secondary circuits. Therefore,
the electrical isolation of two sides is lost.
The apparent power advantage: Ex
Example 4.7: A 100 VA, 120/12 V transformer will be connected to form a step-up
autotransformer with the primary voltage of 120 V.
a.What will be the secondary voltage?
b.What will be the maximum power rating?
c.What will be the power rating advantage?
a. The secondary voltage:
N C  N SE 120  12
VH  VL  120  132V
NC 120
Smax 100
b. The max series winding current: I SE ,max    8.33 A
VSE 12

The secondary apparent power: Sout  VS I S  VH I H  132  8.33  1100VA


c. The power rating advantage: S IO 1100
  11
SW 100
S IO N SE  N C 120  12 132
or     11
SW N SE 12 12
Variable-voltage autotransformers
The effective per-unit impedance of an autotransformer is smaller than of a
conventional transformer by a reciprocal to its power advantage. This is an
additional disadvantage of autotransformers.

It is a common practice to make


variable voltage autotransformers.
3-phase transformers
The majority of the power generation/distribution systems in the world are 3-phase
systems. The transformers for such circuits can be constructed either as a 3-phase
bank of independent identical transformers (can be replaced independently) or as a
single transformer wound on a single 3-legged core (lighter, cheaper, more efficient).
3-phase transformer connections

We assume that any single transformer in a 3-phase transformer (bank)


behaves exactly as a single-phase transformer. The impedance, voltage
regulation, efficiency, and other calculations for 3-phase transformers are
done on a per-phase basis, using the techniques studied previously for
single-phase transformers.

Four possible connections for a 3-phase transformer bank are:


1. Y-Y
2. Y-
3. - 
4. -Y
3-phase transformer connections

1. Y-Y connection:
The primary voltage on each phase of
the transformer is
VLP
V P  (4.77.1)
3
The secondary phase voltage is
VLS  3V S (4.77.2)

The overall voltage ratio is

VLP 3V P
 a (4.77.3)
VLS 3V S
3-phase transformer connections
The Y-Y connection has two very serious problems:
1.If loads on one of the transformer circuits are unbalanced, the
voltages on the phases of the transformer can become severely
unbalanced.
2.The third harmonic issue. The voltages in any phase of an Y-Y
transformer are 1200 apart from the voltages in any other phase.
However, the third-harmonic components of each phase will be in
phase with each other. Nonlinearities in the transformer core always
lead to generation of third harmonic! These components will add up
resulting in large (can be even larger than the fundamental component)
third harmonic component.

Both problems can be solved by one of two techniques:


1.Solidly ground the neutral of the transformers (especially, the primary side). The
third harmonic will flow in the neutral and a return path will be established for the
unbalanced loads.
2.Add a third -connected winding. A circulating current at the third harmonic will
flow through it suppressing the third harmonic in other windings.
3-phase transformer connections

2. Y- connection:
The primary voltage on each phase of
the transformer is
VLP
V P  (4.79.1)
3
The secondary phase voltage is
VLS  V S (4.79.2)

The overall voltage ratio is

VLP 3V P
  3a (4.79.3)
VLS V S
3-phase transformer connections

The Y- connection has no problem with third harmonic components due to
circulating currents in . It is also more stable to unbalanced loads since the 
partially redistributes any imbalance that occurs.
One problem associated with this connection is that the secondary voltage is
shifted by 300 with respect to the primary voltage. This can cause problems when
paralleling 3-phase transformers since transformers secondary voltages must be
in-phase to be paralleled. Therefore, we must pay attention to these shifts.
In the U.S., it is common to make the secondary voltage to lag the primary voltage.
The connection shown in the previous slide will do it.
3-phase transformer connections

3.  -Y connection:
The primary voltage on each phase of
the transformer is

V P  VLP (4.81.1)

The secondary phase voltage is


VLS  3V S (4.81.2)

The overall voltage ratio is

VLP V P a
  (4.81.3)
VLS 3V S 3

The same advantages and the same


phase shift as the Y- connection.
3-phase transformer connections

4.  -  connection:
The primary voltage on each phase of
the transformer is

V P  VLP (4.82.1)

The secondary phase voltage is


VLS  V S (4.82.2)

The overall voltage ratio is

VLP V P
 a (4.82.3)
VLS V S

No phase shift, no problems with


unbalanced loads or harmonics.
Transformer ratings

Transformers have the following major ratings:


1. Apparent power;
2. Voltage;
3. Current;
4. Frequency.
Transformer ratings: Voltage and
Frequency
The voltage rating is a) used to protect the winding insulation from breakdown;
b) related to the magnetization current of the transformer (more important)

flux
If a steady-state voltage
v(t )  VM sin t (4.90.1)

is applied to the transformer’s


primary winding, the transformer’s
flux will be
1 VM
Np 
 (t )  v (t )d t   cos t (4.90.2)
N p
Magnetization
An increase in voltage will lead to a current
proportional increase in flux.
However, after some point (in a
saturation region), such increase in
flux would require an unacceptable
increase in magnetization current!
Transformer ratings: Voltage and
Frequency
Therefore, the maximum applied voltage (and thus the rated voltage) is set by
the maximum acceptable magnetization current in the core.
We notice that the maximum flux is also related to the frequency:

Vmax
max  (4.91.1)
Np
Therefore, to maintain the same maximum flux, a change in frequency (say, 50
Hz instead of 60 Hz) must be accompanied by the corresponding correction in
the maximum allowed voltage. This reduction in applied voltage with frequency
is called derating. As a result, a 50 Hz transformer may be operated at a 20%
higher voltage on 60 Hz if this would not cause insulation damage.
Transformer ratings: Apparent Power

The apparent power rating sets (together with the voltage rating) the
current through the windings. The current determines the i2R losses and,
therefore, the heating of the coils. Remember, overheating shortens the
life of transformer’s insulation!
In addition to apparent power rating for the transformer itself, additional
(higher) rating(s) may be specified if a forced cooling is used. Under any
circumstances, the temperature of the windings must be limited.
Note, that if the transformer’s voltage is reduced (for instance, the
transformer is working at a lower frequency), the apparent power rating
must be reduced by an equal amount to maintain the constant current.
Transformer ratings: Current inrush

Assuming that the following voltage is applied to the transformer at the moment
it is connected to the line:
v(t )  VM sin  t    (4.93.1)

The maximum flux reached on the first half-cycle depends on the phase of the
voltage at the instant the voltage is applied. If the initial voltage is

v(t )  VM sin  t  90   VM cos t (4.93.2)

and the initial flux in the core is zero, the maximum flux during the first half-cycle
is equals to the maximum steady-state flux (which is ok):
VM
max  (4.93.3)
N p
However, if the voltage’s initial phase is zero, i.e.

v(t )  VM sin  t  (4.93.4)


Transformer ratings: Current inrush
the maximum flux during the first half-cycle will be
 
 
1 VM 2VM
max   VM sin  t  dt   cos  t   (4.94.1)
Np 0
N p 0
Np
Which is twice higher than a normal steady-state flux!
Doubling the maximum flux in the core
can bring the core in a saturation and,
therefore, may result in a huge
magnetization current!
Normally, the voltage phase angle cannot
be controlled. As a result, a large inrush
current is possible during the first several
cycles after the transformer is turned ON.
The transformer and the power system
must be able to handle these currents.
Transformer ratings: Information
Plate
Rated voltage, currents, and (or)
power is typically shown on the
transformer’s information plate.

Additional information, such as per-


unit series impedance, type of
cooling, etc. can also be specified on
the plate.
Instrument transformers

Two special-purpose transformers are uses to take measurements: potential and


current transformers.
A potential transformer has a high-voltage primary, low-voltage secondary, and
very low power rating. It is used to provide an accurate voltage samples to
instruments monitoring the power system.
A current transformer samples the current in a line and reduces it to a safe and
measurable level. Such transformer consists of a secondary winding wrapped
around a ferromagnetic ring with a single primary line (that may carry a large
current )running through its center. The ring holds a small sample of the flux from
the primary line. That flux induces a secondary voltage.
Windings in current transformers are loosely coupled: the
mutual flux is much smaller than the leakage flux. The
voltage and current ratios do not apply although the
secondary current is directly proportional to the primary.
Current transformers must be short-circuited at all times
since very high voltages can appear across their terminals.

You might also like