Eye Movements, Eye Blinks, and Behavior
Eye Movements, Eye Blinks, and Behavior
Eye Movements, Eye Blinks, and Behavior
Four methods:
1. Contact-lens method
2. Corneal reflection method
3. Television camera scanning
4. Electrooculogram (EOG)
Electrooculogram (EOG)
Records the movements (and direction) of the eyes
by electrodes placed over the muscles that move the
eye
Can have binocular or monocular set-up (binocular
more reliable)
Head must be kept still so the center of the visual
field is constant
Ideal impedance of the electrodes is under 2,000
ohms (we have been dealing with impedances under
50 Kohms)
The EOG Can Record:
Saccadic movements
Smooth pursuit movements
Nystagmus
Convergence and divergence of the eye
REM during sleep
EOG Complications
3 problems to be cautious of:
1. Small magnitude of EOG signal
2. Skin potential that are the same frequency as the
EOG signal
3. Slow drift- steady deflection of recording in one
direction
• Caused by unclean electrodes and poor contact with the
skin
Binocular Electrode Placement
Electrodes A & B are
used to measure
horizontal eye
movements
Electrodes C & D
measure vertical eye
movements
Electrode E is the
ground
EOG Recording
2. Pursuit
Video
Eye Movements and Learning
Paired – Associates Learning
(Haltrecht & McCormack, 1966)
1. Subject sees word pairs, one word at a time
2. Subject then sees stimulus words
3. Asked to recall second word of word pairs as stimulus words presented
(response words)
- ( Ehrlichman and Barrett, 1983) Saccadic eye movement during 2 kinds of cognitive
activity:
1. Verbal
2. Visual ( did not require viewing stimuli)
- More eye movements to questions calling for verbal processes than visual imagery
- Reflect differences in internal sampling or shifts in cognitive operations
Hemispheric Dominance
Eyes move left or right in a consistent manner after asking a question that required some
thought
- The eyes move rightward for verbal analytic problems and leftward for spatial problems
- (Neubauer, Schulter, & Pfurtscheller, 1988) Greater EEG activation in the hemisphere
contralateral to predominant direction of gaze was observed for both left-movers and
right-movers
Eye Movements and Reading
Reading Efficiency
Buswell (1920) Eye movement reading patterns of students at 13 levels from
first grade to college
Results of reading skills :
1. steady decrease in number of eye fixations per line of reading material
with higher grade levels
2. fixations became shorter in duration
3. number of regressive movements decreased from an average of 5.1 per
line for first graders to .5 for college students
- More efficient readers made fewer and shorter duration eye fixations and had fewer
regressive movements than inefficient readers
Reading Disabilities and Eye
Movements
Lefton (1978) – Studied eye movement patterns of fifth-grade children with reading
disabilities while they did a letter-matching task
Results : Needed an unusually large number of eye fixations to do the task
Abnormal eye movement patterns are the result of poor reading, and that
Pursuit-tracking deficits are under genetic control and that it could possibly be
used as a marker for individuals who may be predisposed to becoming
schizophrenic
It has been suggested that the deficit has its basis in a disorder affecting the
frontal eye fields – leads to inability to inhibit saccades
Study done on manic depressives using lithium carbonate - didn’t worsen
pursuit performance, which supports the idea that smooth pursuit dysfunction
is specific to schizophrenia
Eye Movements and Perception
Gould & Schaffer (1967) – eye movement recordings indicated that sbujects spent
more time fixating patterns that exactly matched a memorized standard than on
those that differed, suggesting that detailed comparisons of features were being
made
Scan Paths
Noton & Stark ( 1971) – analyzed eye movements of subjects while they viewed different
patterns in a “learning phase” and “recognition phase”
Analyses of eye movements indicated that subjects followed similar paths for a given
pattern, and the sequence of movements was usually the same in the recognition phase as
it was in the learning phase.
Suggests that memory for features of a picture is established sequentially by the memory
of eye movements required to look from one feature to the next
Pictoral Information
Mackworth & Morandi (1967) – portions of a picture rated as highly informative by one
group of people were fixated more frequently by another group of individuals who
examined the pictures while their eye movements were measured.
Information one wishes to derive from a visual scene will determine the pattern of eye
movement used in examining the picture
Loftus (1972) – durations of eye fixations did not affect recall of a picture, but the
number of fixations made during a fixed period of viewing did affect later recognition
The greater number of fixations, the more likely the person was to recognize the picture at
another time
Initial fixes were on informative regions initially and the less informative detail received a
greater portion of the fixations later in the viewing sequence
Part III: Eye Illusions
and the Startle Response
Sarah Leis
Muller-Lyer Illusion
There has been some attention paid to the
study of eye movements while persons
experience various kinds of visual illusions.
This is one example.
Muller-Lyer Illusion (Cont’d)
With prolonged inspection the magnitude of
the illusion decreases.
One hypothesis: Due to feedback provided by
erroneous eye movements
If eye movements restricted to one portion of
the figure less 411 will be fed back
An experiment that supports the eye
movements hypothesis
Festinger, White, and Allyn