Multidimensional Scaling - 20MBA55
Multidimensional Scaling - 20MBA55
Relationship Modeling
Multidimensional scales show how things stand in relation to one another. For example, if you made a multidimensional scale of city distances in the United States, Chicago would be
closer to Detroit than it would be to Phoenix.
A- An advantage of this method is that you can look at a multidimensional scale and immediately assess how closely related different values are.
D - A disadvantage, though, is that this technique doesn't deal in real numbers — a multidimensional scale of Boston, New York and Los Angeles would look roughly similar to a
multidimensional scale of London, Dublin and Buenos Aires, even though the actual figures are profoundly different.
Simplifying Tables
A - A multidimensional scale is best used in situations where there's a large amount of data organized in table form. By converting it to a multidimensional scale, you can immediately
assess relationships, which is essentially impossible in a table with 10,000 or more different figures — an amount that's entirely feasible.
D - The disadvantage of this is that a complex formula is necessary to convert raw figures into a multidimensional scale. Therefore, while it's easy to see the relationships between figures,
it takes a large amount of effort to create the table. This means that if you're going to use a multidimensional scale, you need to be certain that there's an actual demand for the information
it's presenting. Otherwise, you're using your time now for no reason other than to save someone else time in the future.
Application
A - Multidimensional scaling is generally used in psychology, graphing subject responses to various stimuli. This method is used because researchers can show relationships of importance
— i.e., how much importance is placed on different variables. This can be extremely useful, as psychological data tends to be high volume and have many different aspects.
D - A disadvantage of this is that it adds another layer of subjectivity to psychological data, as modeling tabled data into a multidimensional scale requires some decision-making. Which
data will go into the scale? Which multipliers will be used to create relationship figures? This has an effect on the multidimensional scale's accuracy.
Steps involved in MDS
Notation
•i and j = sometimes used in place of s and r to indicate primary and secondary points.
•Δ = the matrix (usually n x n) representing the dissimilarities.
•drs = the distance between point r and point s (not to be confused with the dissimilarity
notation drs in the above conversion equation).
Assess Reliabilities and Validity
The input data, and consequently the MDS solutions, are invariably subject to sub
random variability. Hence, it is necessary that some assessment be made of the
relation and validity of MDS solutions. The following guidelines are suggested.
1. The index of fit, or R -square, should be examined. This is squared correlation index
that indices the proportional of variance of the optimally scaled data that can be
accounted for the MDS procedure. Thus, it indicates how well the MDS model fits the
input data. Although higher values of R-square are desirable, values of 0.60 or better are
considered acceptable.
2. Stress values are also indicative of the quality of MDS solutions. Whereas R- square is
a measure of goodness of fit, stress measures badness of fit, or the proportion of variance
of the optimally scaled data that is not accounted for the MDS model. Stress values vary
with the type of MDS procedure and the data being analyzed. For Kruskal’s stress
formula 1, the recommendations for evaluating stress values are as follows.
Importance of Multidimensional Scaling (MDS) for Marketing