Minggu 3 Reservoir Assessment Bhs Indonesia
Minggu 3 Reservoir Assessment Bhs Indonesia
Minggu 3 Reservoir Assessment Bhs Indonesia
TINJAUAN WADUK
Daftar Isi:
• Waduk dan Komponen nya
– Reservoir purposes (Peruntukan Waduk)
– Dam Structures (Struktur Bendungan)
– Spillways (Pelimpah)
– Gates and Sluiceways (Pintu dan Laluan Keluar)
– Reservoir Storage (Daya Tampung Waduk)
• Relation Between Reservoir Yield and Capacity
• Reservoir Site Selection
• Design Capacity
– Useful Storage
– Surcharge Storage
– Dead Storage
• Reservoir Sedimentation Control
WATER RESOURCES ENGINEERING
Reservoirs Assessment
Reservoir Storage
Jatiluhur
Reservoir
WATER RESOURCES ENGINEERING
Reservoirs Assessment
Wadas Lintang
Reservoir
WATER RESOURCES ENGINEERING
Reservoirs Assessment
Site Selection:
– Reservoir capacity should be enough to store
the required water
– Impervious
– Deeper is prefer than shallow reservoir
– Close enough to the water demand site
– Avoid tributary with high sediment yield
– Bulk water transport can be done by gravity
– Close to the quarry
– No productive and settlement areas are
inundated
– No objection due to the Environmental Impact
Analysis
WATER RESOURCES ENGINEERING
Reservoirs Assessment
Location of
Bengoh Reservoir
WATER RESOURCES ENGINEERING
Reservoirs Assessment
Design Capacity:
• Useful Storage
– Simulation of Reservoir Operation
• Selected “critical period” of very low flow
• Using of a long synthetic record
– Operation Study may be performed with annual, monthly,
or daily time intervals.
Monthly is much commonly used, but for large reservoir that
carry over storage for many years, annual interval are
satisfactory. For very small reservoirs, a weekly or daily interval
should be used.
– Mass Curve (Rippl Diagram)
This is a cumulative plotting of reservoir inflow. Usually used
for critical period of very low flow. Demand lines representing a
uniform rate of demand are straight lines. (See Figure)
WATER RESOURCES ENGINEERING
Reservoirs Assessment
500
450
Mass inflow 1000 cu m
400
350
300
250
a r
200 / ye
m
0 cu
5 .00
150 =7
l ope
S
100
50
1932 1933 1934 1935
WATER RESOURCES ENGINEERING
Reservoirs Assessment
– Sequent-peak algorithm
This method is used when using a long (synthetic) record.
Values of cumulative sum of inflow minus withdrawals (including
average evaporation and seepage) are calculated. The first peak
and the sequent peak (next following peak that is greater than the
first peak are identified. The required storage for the intervals the
difference between the initial peak and the lowest through in the
interval.
(+)
(flow – demand)
Maximum
Storage
Storage
Time
(-)
WATER RESOURCES ENGINEERING
Reservoirs Assessment
– What reservoir capacity is required to produce a yield (at uniform rate) a 70
thousand cu m/year for a site where the monthly flow into the reservoir
during a critical flow period as tabulated in the following table (in 1000 cu
m):
October 18 cu m 5 15
November 22 6 17
December 17 6 25
January 26 5 47
February 15 3 16
March 32 2 18
April 8 1 7
May 3 0 4
June 0 0 0
July 0 0 1
August 0 0 3
September 0 7 4
WATER RESOURCES ENGINEERING
Reservoirs Assessment
Dead Storage:
– Sedimentation transport by streams :
• Bedload, No practical device for field measurement is
now in used. Commonly thought that bedload lies
between 5 to 25 % of suspended-load.
• Suspended-sediment load, measured by sampling the
water. Expressed in ppm = parts per million, i.e.:
weight of sediment divided by weight of sediment and
water, and multiplied by 106.
• Relation between suspended-sediment transport Qs
and streamflow Q is:
Qs = k Q n
where n varies between 2 and 3. Sediment Rating
Curve in logarithmic paper will be a straight line.
Capacity inflow ratio
WATER RESOURCES ENGINEERING
Reservoirs Assessment
– Reservoir Sedimentation :
The percent of inflowing sediments that are retained in a
reservoir (Trap Efficiency) is a function of the ratio of
reservoir capacity to the total inflow (annual inflow).
CIR 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0
87.5 92.5 95.0 95.5 96.0 96.0 96.5 97.0 97.5 98.0
TE
Solution:
Capacity Capacity Trap Efficiency Annual Incre- Years
ment
(106 m3) Inflow Sediment to fill
Ratio Trap
At Average (106 (106 (106
Indicated for Tons) m3) m3)
volume increment
(%) (%)
40 0.5 96.0
TOTAL 178.7
WATER RESOURCES ENGINEERING
Reservoirs Assessment
Reservoirs Assessment
Surcharge Storage Design
• Routing through Uncontrolled Reservoir (manually)
I = O + dS/dt where:
I = Inflow (m3/sec)
O = Outflow
dS/dt = change in volume of water in the storage
For time = t, the formula can be written as:
t *(I1 + I2)/2 – t * (O1 + O2)/2 = S2 – S1
I1 and I2 are known from the flood hydrograph (inflow)
S1 is initial volume of water store up to the spillway crest level.
O1 is initial outflow from the spillway, and calculated as:
WATER RESOURCES ENGINEERING
Reservoirs Assessment
O1 is initial outflow from the spillway, and calculated as:
Q = CLH 1.5 , where
Q = discharge that flowing through spillway crest
C = spillway coefficient
L = Spillway Length
H
H = Height of water above the crest
L
Reservoirs Assessment
Spillway rating curve
Elevation (m)
Discharge (m3/sec)
WATER RESOURCES ENGINEERING
Reservoirs Assessment
Routing through Uncontrolled spillway (L = 125 m)
Time Inflow ½ (I1 +I2) S + O/2 Outflow Elv.
(hour) (m3/sec) (m3/sec) (1hr m3/s) (m3/sec)
0 0 7500 0 57.0
1 11 5 7505 5
2 33 22 7522 5
3 77 55 7572 9
4 217 147 7710 25
5 815 516 8201 83
6 1911 1363 9481 294
7 2450 2180 11367 842
8 2441 2445 12970 1239
9 2198 2319 14050 1706
10 1889 2043 14387 1898 60.9
11 1308 1508 14087 1708
12 811 1059 13438 1348
13 558 684 12744 1187
WATER RESOURCES ENGINEERING
Reservoirs Assessment
2500 6
2000
5
Peak Outflow
Peak Depth
1500
4
1000
3
500
0 2
0 25 50 75 100 125 150 175 200
Spillway Length
WATER RESOURCES ENGINEERING
Reservoirs Assessment
Spillway crest
Flood Control
Dead Storage
HEP
Sluiceway
Irrigation
& Other
Water Supply
Sumof Inflow
minus Demand
(acre-ft)
100
200
0
1
6
11
16
Time (Month) 21
26
31
Sequent Peak Algorithm
36
Rippl Diagram
350
300
Mass Inflow (acre-ft)
250
200
150
100
50
0
1
13
16
19
25
28
10
22
31
34
Time (Month)