Arens14e ch25 PPT Ge

Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 37

Other Assurance Services

Chapter 25

©2012 Pearson Education, Auditing 14/e, Arens/Elder/Beasley 5-5


Learning Objective 1

Understand the level of assurance and


evidence requirements for review and
compilation services.

©2012 Pearson Education, Auditing 14/e, Arens/Elder/Beasley 25 - 2


Review and Compilation
Services
The standards for compilations and
reviews of financial statements are
called Statements on Standards
for Accounting and Review
Services (SSARS).

©2012 Pearson Education, Auditing 14/e, Arens/Elder/Beasley 25 - 3


Relationship Between Evidence
Accumulation and Assurance Attained

High
Assurance Attained

(Audit)
Level of

Moderate
(Review)

None
(Compilation)
Minimal Significant Extensive
(Compilation) (Review) (Audit)
Amount of Evidence Accumulated

©2012 Pearson Education, Auditing 14/e, Arens/Elder/Beasley 25 - 4


Review Services

A review service (SSARS review) engagement


is designed to allow the accountant to express
limited assurance that the financial statements
are in accordance with GAAP.

©2012 Pearson Education, Auditing 14/e, Arens/Elder/Beasley 25 - 5


Procedures Suggested
for Reviews

Obtain Make
Know the
industry inquiries of
client
knowledge management

Perform Obtain a
Prepare
analytical representation
documentation
procedures letter

©2012 Pearson Education, Auditing 14/e, Arens/Elder/Beasley 25 - 6


Form of Review Report

©2012 Pearson Education, Auditing 14/e, Arens/Elder/Beasley 25 - 7


Compilation Services

Defined in SSARS as one in which accountants


present to a client or third party, financial
statements that the accountant has prepared.

The CPA firm does not express any assurance


on the statements.

©2012 Pearson Education, Auditing 14/e, Arens/Elder/Beasley 25 - 8


Requirements for Compilation

 Document services to be
performed and a description
of the report

 Know the industry accounting


principles and practices

 Know the client

©2012 Pearson Education, Auditing 14/e, Arens/Elder/Beasley 25 - 9


Requirements for Compilation

 Determine whether the client’s information


is satisfactory

 Review the compiled financial statements


for any obvious omissions or errors in
math and GAAP

©2012 Pearson Education, Auditing 14/e, Arens/Elder/Beasley 25 - 10


Form of Compilation Report

Full
Disclosure

No
Disclosure
Compilation
without
independence
©2012 Pearson Education, Auditing 14/e, Arens/Elder/Beasley 25 - 11
Form of Compilation Report

Full
Disclosure

No
Disclosure

©2012 Pearson Education, Auditing 14/e, Arens/Elder/Beasley 25 - 12


Form of Compilation Report
(without disclosures)

Full
Disclosure

No
Disclosure

©2012 Pearson Education, Auditing 14/e, Arens/Elder/Beasley 25 - 13


Learning Objective 2

Describe special engagements to review


interim financial information for public
companies.

©2012 Pearson Education, Auditing 14/e, Arens/Elder/Beasley 25 - 14


Review of Interim Financial
Information for Public Companies

The SEC requires quarterly financial statements


to be reviewed by the company’s external auditor
prior to the company’s filing of the Form 10-Q.

Like reviews under SSARS, a public company


interim review includes the five requirements for
review service engagements.

©2012 Pearson Education, Auditing 14/e, Arens/Elder/Beasley 25 - 15


Review of Interim Financial
Information for Public Companies

Like reviews under SSARS, a review for a public


company does not provide a basis for expressing
a positive form opinion.

The review is conducted according to the


standards of the PCAOB and there is no
reference to the SSARS in a review report.

©2012 Pearson Education, Auditing 14/e, Arens/Elder/Beasley 25 - 16


Learning Objective 3

Distinguish AICPA attestation standards


from auditing standards and know the
type of engagements to which they apply.

©2012 Pearson Education, Auditing 14/e, Arens/Elder/Beasley 25 - 17


Attestation Engagements

Attestation
standards

Types of
engagements

Levels
of service

©2012 Pearson Education, Auditing 14/e, Arens/Elder/Beasley 25 - 18


Types of Engagements and
Related Reports
Type of Amount of Level of Form of
Engagement Evidence Assurance Conclusion Distribution

Examination Extensive High Positive General


Review Significant Moderate Negative General
Agreed-upon
procedures Varying Varying Findings Limited

©2012 Pearson Education, Auditing 14/e, Arens/Elder/Beasley 25 - 19


Learning Objective 4

Understand the nature of WebTrust and


SysTrust assurance services.

©2012 Pearson Education, Auditing 14/e, Arens/Elder/Beasley 25 - 20


WebTrust Services

In a WebTrust attestation engagement, a


client engages a CPA to provide reasonable
assurance that a company’s Web site complies
with certain Trust Services principles and criteria
for one or more aspects of e-commerce activities.

©2012 Pearson Education, Auditing 14/e, Arens/Elder/Beasley 25 - 21


Five Trust Services Principles
Security The system is protected against
unauthorized access
Availability The system is available for operation
and use as committed or agreed
Processing System processing is complete,
integrity accurate, timely, and authorized
Online Personal information obtained as a result o
privacy e-commerce is collected, used, disclosed,
and retained as committed or agreed
Confidentiality Information designated as confidential
is protected as committed or agreed
©2012 Pearson Education, Auditing 14/e, Arens/Elder/Beasley 25 - 22
SysTrust Services

In a SysTrust engagement, the SysTrust


licensed CPA evaluates a company’s
computer system using Trust Services
principles and criteria.

The service provides assurance to


management, directors, or third parties
about the reliability of information systems
used to generate real-time information
©2012 Pearson Education, Auditing 14/e, Arens/Elder/Beasley 25 - 23
Learning Objective 5

Describe engagements to report on internal


controls at service organizations.

©2012 Pearson Education, Auditing 14/e, Arens/Elder/Beasley 25 - 24


Internal Control Reports at
Service Organizations
 Historically referred to as
SAS 70 engagements
Two types of reports

Type I – report on the design


of controls
 Type II – report on the
operating effectiveness
of controls

©2012 Pearson Education, Auditing 14/e, Arens/Elder/Beasley 25 - 25


Learning Objective 6

Describe special engagements to attest to


prospective financial statements.

©2012 Pearson Education, Auditing 14/e, Arens/Elder/Beasley 25 - 26


Prospective Financial
Statements
Forecasts
and
Projections
Use of
prospective
financial
statements
Types of
engagements
©2012 Pearson Education, Auditing 14/e, Arens/Elder/Beasley 25 - 27
Examinations of Prospective
Financial Statements
Evaluating the preparation of the prospective
financial statements

Evaluate the underlying support for assumptions

Evaluate the presentation for conformity with


AICPA guidelines

Issuing an examination report


©2012 Pearson Education, Auditing 14/e, Arens/Elder/Beasley 25 - 28
Learning Objective 7

Describe agreed-upon procedures


engagements.

©2012 Pearson Education, Auditing 14/e, Arens/Elder/Beasley 25 - 29


Agreed-Upon Procedures
Engagements
The audit is limited to certain specific
audit procedures.

These are referred to as procedures


and findings engagements.

The SASs deal with financial statement


items, whereas the SSAEs deal with
nonfinancial statement matters.

©2012 Pearson Education, Auditing 14/e, Arens/Elder/Beasley 25 - 30


Learning Objective 8

Describe other audit and limited assurance


engagements related to historical financial
statements.

©2012 Pearson Education, Auditing 14/e, Arens/Elder/Beasley 25 - 31


Other Comprehensive
Basis of Accounting

Cash or Regulatory
modified agency
cash basis basis

Definite
Tax basis set of
criteria

©2012 Pearson Education, Auditing 14/e, Arens/Elder/Beasley 25 - 32


Specified Elements,
Accounts, or Items
Auditors are often asked to audit and issue
reports on specific aspects of financial
statements.

©2012 Pearson Education, Auditing 14/e, Arens/Elder/Beasley 25 - 33


Specified Elements,
Accounts, or Items

Two differences in these types of audits:

1. Materiality is defined by the item audited

2. GAAS (first standard) does not apply.

©2012 Pearson Education, Auditing 14/e, Arens/Elder/Beasley 25 - 34


Debt Compliance Letters
and Similar Reports
The engagement and report should be
limited to compliance matters the
auditor is qualified to evaluate.

The auditor should provide a debt


compliance letter only for a client
for whom the auditor has done an
audit of the overall financial statements.

©2012 Pearson Education, Auditing 14/e, Arens/Elder/Beasley 25 - 35


Debt Compliance Letters
and Similar Reports
The auditor’s opinion is in the form of a
negative assurance, stating that nothing
came to the auditor’s attention that would
lead the auditor to believe there was
noncompliance.

©2012 Pearson Education, Auditing 14/e, Arens/Elder/Beasley 25 - 36


End of Chapter 25

©2012 Pearson Education, Auditing 14/e, Arens/Elder/Beasley 5-5

You might also like