Solution of The Formulated Problems: Solution of The L.P.P. May Be of Three Types, Viz
Solution of The Formulated Problems: Solution of The L.P.P. May Be of Three Types, Viz
Evaluation Table
Fan X1 360 1 22
sewing machine X2 240 1 18
(ii) Formulation of L.P.P.
Maximize (Profit) Z = 22 X1 + 18 X2
Subject to Constraints :
(1) 360 X1 + 240 X2 ≤ 5760
(2) X1 + X2 ≤ 20 and
Subject to non-negativity condition
X1 , X 2 ≤ 0
2nd Step: Conversion of constraints into equations and determination of the values of
the ordinates.
(1) 360 X1 + 240 X2 = 5760
Here , When X1 = 0 X2 = 24
When X2 = 0 X1 = 16
(2) X1 + X2 = 20
Here , When X1 = 0 X2 = 20
When X2 = 0 X1 = 20
3rd to 6th Step .
Graphic Representation of the Constraints lines of the L.P.P.
7th Step: Evaluation of the Objective Function.
P 0 0 22 X 0 + 18 X 0 0
Q 0 20 22 X 0 + 18 X 20 360
R 8 12 22 X 8 + 18 X 12 392(Max)
S 16 0 22 X 16 + 18 X 0 352
Hence, the company should purchase 8 units of X1 i.e., Fan and 12 Units of X2
i.e., sewing machine to make the maximum profit of ₹. 392.
On Minimization
Illustration: A farmer is engaged in breeding pigs. The pigs are fed on various products
grown on the farm. Because of the need to ensure nutrients constituents, it is necessary to
buy additional one or two products, which we shall call A and B. The nutrient constituents
(vitamins and proteins) in each of the product are given below:
X 36 6 108
Y 3 12 36
Product A costs
Z ₹. 20 per unit and ₹. 40 per unit. Determine
20 product B costs 10 100how much of
products A and B must be purchased so as to provide the pigs nutrients not less than the
minimum required, at the lowest possible cost. Solve Graphically.
Solution:
Mathematical formulation of the above
Min: Z= 20 X1 + 40 X2 Cost Function
S.T. Constraints
36X1+ 6X2 ≥ 108
3X1 + 12X2 ≥ 36 Nutrient constraints
20X1 + 10X2 ≥ 100
Where X1, X2 ≥ 0 Non negativity
P X1 1 0 5
Q X1 0 1 8
Total 5 kg. Maximum ≤ 4 kg.
Minimum ≥ 2 kg
3. Formulation of L.P.P.
Minimize cost Z = 5 X1 + 8 X2
Subject to the constraints:
(i) X1 + X2= 5
(ii) X1 + 0X2 ≤ 4
(iii) 0X1 + X2 ≥2 and
Non-negativity condition that X1, X2 ≥0 .
4. Conversion of the constraints into equations and determination of the
values of the different sets of the coordinates.
(i) X1 + X2= 5
Here if X1 = 0 X 2= 5
if X2 = 0 X 1= 5
(ii) X1 + 0X2= 4
Here if X1 = 0, X2 ≥ 0 i.e., ∞ (infinity)
if X2 = 0 X 1= 4
(iii) 0X1 + X2= 2
Here if X1 = 0, X2 =2
if X2 = 0 X1 ≥ 2 i.e., ∞ (infinity)
5. Graphic Representation of the constraint lines of the L.P.P.
The above graph shows that there is no feasible region but has the feasible corner
points, viz., A and B which satisfy both the constraints X1≤4 and X2≥ 2. The corner
point 'C’ is not a feasible point as it does not satisfy the condition, X 2≥ 2.
A 3 2 5x3+8x2 31 (Min)
BFrom the above evaluation
4 table2it is clear that
5 x the
4 + 8optimal
x2 solution lies at
36
the Corner point A, since it has the minimum cost of ₹. 31.
Thus the minimum cost will be ₹. 31.