DLW2013 Commercial Law
DLW2013 Commercial Law
DLW2013 Commercial Law
1. By agreement :
I. Upon the true construction of section 35(1) of the Partnership Act 1961, the agreement made between the
partners to the contrary must have been made before the death of any partner. An agreement made by the
surviving partners after the death of a partner without the agreement of the deceased partner will not bind the
deceased partner nor will it make the partnership a continuing partnership.
II. On the death of any partner, a partnership therefore stands dissolved un-less there is evidence that the partners
had agreed otherwise. The onus is on the defendants to prove not only the existence of an agreement between
the surviving partners but the existence of an agreement between all the partners including the deceased
partner. (This is so because by the death of ' the partner it is no longer possible to adhere to the original
contract, the essence of which must be that all parties to it must be alive.)
4. By Supervening Illegality
a) If an event occurs which make it unlawful for the business of the film to
be carried on or for the members of the firm to carry on in partnership,
the partnership is dissolved – S.36
5. By charging on Shares
b) Where a partners suffers his share of his partnership property to
be charged with payment of his personal debt, the other partners
have the option of dissolving the partnership – S.35(2)
Dissolution By The Court
The court may virtue off section 37 of the partnership act 1961 may dissolve a
partnership on the application by the other partner.
a) Partners mental incapacity : the court may dissolve the firm when the
partners becomes in sane by virtue of Section 37(a). The partner
concerned must be unable to perform his duties,because of mental
disorder, of managing his property and affairs. The insanity must be of
permanent nature, otherwise there can be no grounds to dissolve the
partnership.
• By the time the case reached the court the partner had recovered and the
court did not grant the dissolution
c) Conduct Prejudicial to the business : Section 37(c) Partnership Act
1961 provides that a partnership may be dissolved when a partner is found
to be guilty of any misconduct. This situation will be considered by the
courts affecting prejudicially the carrying on of the business. Moral
misconduct is not enough unless, in the view of the court, it is likely to effect
the business.
CASE : Lee Lay Lay v Wong Yiik Tai (unreported, 24 May 2007
Originating Summons No 24-433-2005-I), [2007] MLJU 585.
• Where the application to dissolve the partnership is made on 'just
and equitable' grounds which are seriously disputed, it would be
wrong or inappropriate for the court to decide the issue purely on
affidavit evidence.
• The court has taken an approach similar to considering whether a
company incorporated under companies legislation should be
wound up on just and equitable principles.
CASE : Re Yenidje Tobacco Co Ltd [1916] 2 Ch 426at 430, CA (Eng).
Definition A legal entity which is separate from its owners. A business entity with individuals who share the risk and benefits of business.
Formed Formed under operational state laws with Articles of Incorporation. An agreement among the members.
Types subchapter-s corporation, professional corporation general partnership, limited partnership, limited liability partnerships
Structure Members of a corporation have to act in accordance with the corporation's Partnerships have to adhere to a partnership agreement. More flexible, less
charter. More structured, less flexible. Easier to transfer ownership of part of structured. Each part of the business has to be individually transferred or
a corporation. sold.
Raising money By sale of financial instruments like stocks and bonds. From current members, getting new members, a loan
Liability The stockholders are not held responsible in case of a fault, the corporation is. The partners share the liability, and are directly responsible in case of fault.