DLW2013 Commercial Law

Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 20

DLW2013 COMMERCIAL LAW

Topic : Relation Between Partners


PREPARED FOR : MADAM SITI FATIMATUZ
PREPARED BY :
 ANIS ATHIRAH AZMAN HOH
 SIVARANJINI KALIAPPAN
 THAYALAN SHANMUGAM
Overview of presentation
• Relation between partner

• Termination and annulment of a partnership

• Partnership vs Company: a comparison


Introduction
• If possible, introduce your presentation with interesting facts or videos to
attract ur friends attention
RELATIONS BETWEEN PARTNERS
• The relations between partners to one another are determined by their
partnership agreement.
• The agreement normally provides for the rights and duties of the partners, the
conduct and management of the firm, the capital and their profit sharing
arrangement.
• In the absence of provisions being made under the agreement – Partnership
Act Applies
• Example :

1. Duty of partners to render accounts – S.20


2. Accountability of partners for private profits – S.31
CASE : Green V Howell
• The partnership agreement provided that if either partner committed any
breach of the articles or any flagrant breach of his duties as a partner, the
other partner might, by notice in writing, terminate the partnership.
• When one of the partners committed such a breach, the other partner
served him with a notice of dissolution on the grounds that he had
committed breaches of certain specified articles.
Held :
Unless there was evidence of bad faith, it was not necessary for the other
partner to disclose the reasons and causes of the flagrant act. The notice was
therefore valid.
TERMINATION & ANNULMENT OF A
PARTNERSHIP
• Method of dissolving a Partnership

• A partnership may be terminated or dissolved as follows :

1. By agreement :

a) If the duration of the partnership has been specified in the partnership


agreement, the partnership is terminated on the expiry of that period.
b) If the partners mutually agree to dissolve the partnership.
2. By operation of law (unless otherwise agreed between the partners)
(a) If the partnership was entered into for a fixed term and the term
expires – S.34(1)(a)
(b) If the partnership was entered into a single adventure or undertaking,
and that adventure or undertaking terminates – S.34(1)(b)
(c) If the partnership was entered into for an undefined time, by any
partner giving notice to the other partner(s) of his intention to
determine (or end) the partnership.
3. By death or bankruptcy (unless otherwise agreed between the
partners – S.35(1)
CASE : Lee Choo Yam Holdings Sdn Bhd & Ors V
Khoo Yoke Wah & Ors
• Facts : The plaintiffs applied for a declaration that the partnership was dissolved by the death of any partner.

Held : Allowing the plaintiffs' application :

I. Upon the true construction of section 35(1) of the Partnership Act 1961, the agreement made between the
partners to the contrary must have been made before the death of any partner. An agreement made by the
surviving partners after the death of a partner without the agreement of the deceased partner will not bind the
deceased partner nor will it make the partnership a continuing partnership.

II. On the death of any partner, a partnership therefore stands dissolved un-less there is evidence that the partners
had agreed otherwise. The onus is on the defendants to prove not only the existence of an agreement between
the surviving partners but the existence of an agreement between all the partners including the deceased
partner. (This is so because by the death of ' the partner it is no longer possible to adhere to the original
contract, the essence of which must be that all parties to it must be alive.)
4. By Supervening Illegality

a) If an event occurs which make it unlawful for the business of the film to
be carried on or for the members of the firm to carry on in partnership,
the partnership is dissolved – S.36
5. By charging on Shares
b) Where a partners suffers his share of his partnership property to
be charged with payment of his personal debt, the other partners
have the option of dissolving the partnership – S.35(2)
Dissolution By The Court
The court may virtue off section 37 of the partnership act 1961 may dissolve a
partnership on the application by the other partner.
a) Partners mental incapacity : the court may dissolve the firm when the
partners becomes in sane by virtue of Section 37(a). The partner
concerned must be unable to perform his duties,because of mental
disorder, of managing his property and affairs. The insanity must be of
permanent nature, otherwise there can be no grounds to dissolve the
partnership.

b) Partners Physical Incapacity : According to section37(b) Partnership act


1961, the incapacity must be permanent.
CASE : WHITWELL V ARTHUR (1865) 35 Beav 140
•  a partner was paralysed for some months

•  By the time the case reached the court the partner had recovered and the
court did not grant the dissolution
c) Conduct Prejudicial to the business : Section 37(c) Partnership Act
1961 provides that a partnership may be dissolved when a partner is found
to be guilty of any misconduct. This situation will be considered by the
courts affecting prejudicially the carrying on of the business. Moral
misconduct is not enough unless, in the view of the court, it is likely to effect
the business.

CASE : SNOW V MILFORD (1868) 18 LT 142


a partner’s massive adultery all over Exeter was not regarded by the
court as sufficient grounds for dissolution under the section.
• Dishonesty could be construed as conduct prejudicially affecting the
carrying on of a partnership business which would then entitle the other
partners to apply to the court for a decree of dissolution.

CASE : Carmichael v Evans [1904] 1 Ch 486.


A partner in a drapery business was served with a notice of expulsion in
consequence of his conviction for travelling on a railway without paying his
fare and 'with intent to avoid payment thereof‘.
Of first instance inclined strongly to the view that the notice was valid.
d)  Breach of agreement : The court may dissolve a partnership by section
37(d) partnership Act 1961 when one partner breaches the partnership
agreement either willfully or persistently. Here the word willful means a
serious breach inflicting damage to the business or on the firm. However
the court will not interfere if the breach was a minor one and has no impact
on the business of the firm. Thus occasionally bad tempered or behaving
rudely will not suffice.
Note: No partner can force dissolution by his own default.
e) Business carried on at a loss : This is provided by section 37(e)
Partnership Act 1961. if the business can only be carried on at a loss that it
can be petitioned to the court to dissolve the partnership. As we know the
essential of having a partnership is in order for two or more people to get
together in the common view of making profit. If this purpose is defeated
then it is proper for the courts to dissolve the partnership.
• The court will decree a dissolution under this provision where there is a
practical impossibility of making a profit and this impossibility must be proven.

CASE : Handyside v Campbell (1901) 17 TLR 623.


The plaintiff applied to the court for a decree of dissolution on grounds that
the partnership could only be carried on at a loss. The other partners
admitted that there was a loss at that time but alleged that it was owing in
part to past mismanagement by the plaintiff and in part to his long absence
from business due to illness and that his absence still continued.
The evidence did not amount to a practical impossibility of profit and
refused to grant a decree of dissolution.
• f) Just and equitable grounds : The court will grant a decree of dissolution where
circumstances have arisen which, in the opinion of the court, render it just and equitable
that the partnership be dissolved.
• In deciding whether a partnership ought to be dissolved on just and equitable grounds the
court will scrutinize wholly.

CASE : Lee Lay Lay v Wong Yiik Tai (unreported, 24 May 2007
Originating Summons No 24-433-2005-I), [2007] MLJU 585.
• Where the application to dissolve the partnership is made on 'just
and equitable' grounds which are seriously disputed, it would be
wrong or inappropriate for the court to decide the issue purely on
affidavit evidence.
• The court has taken an approach similar to considering whether a
company incorporated under companies legislation should be
wound up on just and equitable principles.
CASE : Re Yenidje Tobacco Co Ltd [1916] 2 Ch 426at 430, CA (Eng).

• the circumstances which would justify the winding-up of a partnership


are circumstances which should induce the court to exercise its
jurisdiction under the just and equitable clause and to wind-up the
company.
Parthership and company : a comparison
  Corporation Partnership

Definition A legal entity which is separate from its owners. A business entity with individuals who share the risk and benefits of business.

Ownership Stockholders Partners

Formed Formed under operational state laws with Articles of Incorporation. An agreement among the members.

Types subchapter-s corporation, professional corporation general partnership, limited partnership, limited liability partnerships

Management Run by a board of directors Run by the partners

Structure Members of a corporation have to act in accordance with the corporation's Partnerships have to adhere to a partnership agreement. More flexible, less

charter. More structured, less flexible. Easier to transfer ownership of part of structured. Each part of the business has to be individually transferred or

a corporation. sold.

Raising money By sale of financial instruments like stocks and bonds. From current members, getting new members, a loan

Liability The stockholders are not held responsible in case of a fault, the corporation is. The partners share the liability, and are directly responsible in case of fault.

Dissolution Stockholder approval, government approval Decision of the partners


CONCLUSION
In conclusion we have berapa points nis..
Yg warna merah terang tu sume madam suruh edit and I dah edit..
And kat intro tu add this link sbb kita guna partnership act 1961
http://www.agc.gov.my/Akta/Vol.%203/Act%20135.pdf
And that’s all nis..
Thank you.
REMARKS
• PLS CHANGE THE SIZE OF THE WORD TO AT LEAST 24’..NOT 16’

• USE UR FULL CREATIVITY TO MAKE UR SLIDES MORE ATTRACTIVE


YOUR SLIDE QUITE SIMPLE
• U MAY USE SMART ART TO DO CHART OR GRAPHIC

• REFER TO THE WORDS MARKED IN RED IN THE SLIDES

You might also like