MODULE 4:foundations of The Principles of Business Ethics
MODULE 4:foundations of The Principles of Business Ethics
MODULE 4:foundations of The Principles of Business Ethics
Ethics of Principles and Rights • Making decisions based on principle, and not just on
consequences
• The ends DO NOT justify the means
• Example:
• The aggressive drive of the government to apprehend drug addicts
and rehabilitate them will not just benefit the drug addicts
themselves but also their families and the society
Rule-based Utilitarianism Act-based Utilitarianism
Definition General principles are used in The decision is based on the
making a decision on the greatest likelihood of achieving greatest
benefit that can be achieved from utility or good by analyzing
an action. particular actions or behavior.
Key Concepts Uses rules to determine ethical Uses analysis of particular actions
behavior or behavior to determine what is
the best behavior.
Application in Business Companies usually have a An employee of a company that
confidentiality clause, where manufactures milk tainted with
employees who share trades melamine (a toxic industrial
secrets, formulations, company compound that gives the
documents, etc., may be given appearance of higher protein
sanctions or terminated when content when added to milk,
the divulge this information to a which causes protein deficiency
competitor or the public. and malnutrition leading to infant
deaths) may choose to divulge
this information to the media or
public in order to save babies
from dying. While it violated the
• Utilitarian concepts are widely practiced in the government and
business environments, because utilitarianism considers both the
collective interests as well some particular interest analyzes and
formulates alternative choices based on the greatest good of
everyone involved in the decisions, and estimates the costs and
benefits of alternative choices for the affected groups.
• Utilitarianism and Business Decisions
• Utilitarianism answers the fundamental question “what should we do?”
which is always applicable in business because of the many decisions that
need to be done. In reference to maximizing overall good, business
organizations are always on the lookout for conducting cost-benefit analysis in
making a decision based on the maximum benefits that can be achieved with
minimal costs
• In the example provided in table, when an employee found out that melamine is being
used in the milk that his or her company manufactures, there are different stakeholders
that will be affected by divulging this information:
1. The consumers will benefit from the employees action as the company will most likely
be shutdown, or the milk manufactured will be withdrawn from the market, so the
baby will stay safe.
2. The company may be close down.
3. The employees will lose their jobs.
4. The suppliers of the company will lose a client.
5. The environment may benefit if the company has dismal manufacturing practices.
• By assessing effect utilitarianism will have on the different
stakeholders involved, the management or the governing body can
take action on the situation.
• However, there are also challenges in using utilitarianism in making
decisions.
• 1. there are really no exact definition of “good” for all concerned, and
there is no agreement on who decides, whose interests are prioritized
in decisions, and for whose good it is that has to be considered.
• 2. it will be hard to quantify the costs of nonmonetary stakes and
long-term effects of an action.
• 3. while utilitarianism considers the collective interest, there are times
when individual interest may need to be prioritized.
Ethics of Principles and Rights
• Considering the greatest good in decision-making is definitely an ethical way of arriving at a decision,
but it is also important to consider principles and not just consequences. This explores the relationship
between legislative and judicial branches of government---- legislative role creates policies and
regulations based on utilitarian principles, while judicial role enforces these laws to achieved justice and
fairness. The second framework in this ethical philosophy is that some decisions are needed to be made
based on principles rather than consequences. For example, paying a bribe to customs will promote
greater good for the stakeholders, as follows:
• 1. The company will be able to process the raw materials immediately so they can be turned into
products.
• 2. the consumers will not experience delay in enjoying the products.
• 3. the customs officials will receive additional compensation that they can use to feed their families.
• However, the Philippine Constitution Republic Act No. 3019, or the Anti-Graft and Corrupt Practices Act, prohibits public
officials from receiving any gift in exchange for a favor. Thus, paying a bribe is not ethical based on ethics of principles and
rights.
Virtue Ethics
Virtues can be described as the character traits that would constitute a
good and meaningful life. Being happy, friendly, joyful, and calm;
preserving integrity and dignity; having good relationships; and processing
modest things are a few of the characteristics of having a meaningful life.
Virtue ethics is grounded on character traits and emphasizes moral
character in contrast to moral rules (deontology) or consequences of
actions (consequentialist approach and utilitarianism). It has roots in
ancient Chinese and Greek philosophy and is recognized to have been
established by Plato and Aristotle. It focuses on the type of person you
want to be, grounded on good character, motives, and core values, and not
on the actions that should be taken.
Impacts of Different Belief Systems on Business Ethics.