Evolution of Management Thought
Evolution of Management Thought
Evolution of Management Thought
MANAGEMENT THOUGHT
HENRY FAYOL’S ADMINISTRATIVE MANAGEMENT
Who was Henry Fayol?
10. Order – Fayol wrote that, "The right man in the right place" forms an
effective social order. He applied the same maxim to materials: right one,
right place.
13. Initiative – Employees should be encouraged to develop and carry out plans
for improvement. As Fayol wrote, "At all levels of the organizational ladder,
zeal and energy on the part of employees are augmented by initiative.“
14. Esprit de Corps – Organizations should strive to promote team spirit, unity,
and morale.
1. Planning – the need "to assess the future and make provision for it."
That includes a flexible action plan that considers a firm's resources,
work in progress, and future market trends.
2. Organizing – laying out lines of authority and responsibility for
employees. This covers recruitment and training, coordinating
activities, and making employees' duties clear.
3. Commanding – getting the most from people. So, managers must
know their employees' skills, delegate to tap into these skill sets, and
set a good example.
4. Coordinating – in a well-coordinated organization, departments
know their responsibilities, the needs of other teams, and their
obligations to them.
5. Controlling – continually checking that rules, plans and processes
are working as well as they should be.
Is Fayolism still Relevant today?
1. His Principles advocate teamwork and working together for the mutual
benefit of the business.
2. The Five Functions reveal the need for organizations to plan and be agile in
the face of changing market conditions.
3. Fayol was one of the first people to recognize that management is a
continuous process.
4. Before human resources management, Fayol wrote about motivating people
by inspiring initiative, commanding respect through values, and ensuring
that people have the time and training they need to be happy and productive
at work.
5. The manager who is respected for their values, leads by example , makes time
to get to know their employees, and gives them the training they need, sounds
a lot like a modern manager.
Criticism of Fayol’s Principles of Management
1. Too formal and Vague : the principle of division of work does not tell
how the task should be divided. Again, to say that an organization needs
coordination is merely to state the obvious.
2. Inconsistency Principles of administrative theory were based on personal
experience and limited observations. There is too much generalizations
and lack empirical evidence.
Importance to "commanding" and not "directing" the workers.
3. Pro-management Bias: Administrative theory does not pay adequate
attention to workers. Workers are treated as biological machines or inert
instruments in the work process.
4. Historical value: Fayol's theory was relevant when organizations
operated in a stable and predictable environment.
Thank You
Presented by:
Anirudh Aggarwal
Poushali Chakraborty
Tarun Barve
Ravi Teja
Sai Shanmukhi
Vaishnavi CA Muni
Shashank S Takbhaware