Organizational Structure and Design
Organizational Structure and Design
Organizational Structure and Design
Design
9–1
Designing Organizational Structure
• Organizing
Arranging and structuring work to accomplish an organization’s
goals.
• Organizational Structure
The formal arrangement of jobs/tasks within an organization.
9–2
Purposes of Organizing
9–3
Organizational Design
• When Managers create or change the structure,
they are engaged in Organizational design.
1. Work specialization
2. Departmentalization
3. Chain of command
4. Span of control
5. Centralization and decentralization
6. Formalization
9–4
Organizational Structure
• Work Specialization
The degree to which tasks in the organization are
divided into separate jobs with each step completed
by a different person.
Overspecialization can result in the form of boredom,
fatigue (exhaustion), stress, poor quality, increased
absenteeism, and higher turnover.
9–5
Departmentalization by Type
• Functional • Process
Grouping jobs by Grouping jobs on the
functions performed basis of product or
• Product customer flow
Grouping jobs by product • Customer
line Grouping jobs by type of
• Geographical customer and needs
Grouping jobs on the
basis of territory or
geography
9–6
The Five Common Forms of Departmentalization
9–7
Geographical Departmentalization
9–8
Product Departmentalization
9–9
Process Departmentalization
9–10
Customer Departmentalization
9–11
Organizational Structure (cont’d)
• Chain of Command
The continuous line of authority that extends from
upper levels of an organization to the lowest levels of
the organization and clarifies who reports to whom.
9–12
Organizational Structure (cont’d)
• Authority
The rights inherent in a managerial position to tell
people what to do and to expect them to do it.
• Responsibility
The obligation or expectation to perform.
• Unity of Command
The concept that a person should have one boss and
should report only to that person.
9–13
Organizational Structure (cont’d)
• Span of Control
The number of employees who can be effectively and efficiently
supervised by a manager.
Width of span is affected by:
Skills and abilities of the manager
Employee characteristics
Characteristics of the work being done
Similarity of tasks
Complexity of tasks
Physical proximity of subordinates
Standardization of tasks
Sophistication of the organization’s information system
Strength of the organization’s culture
Preferred style of the manager
9–14
Contrasting Spans of Control
9–15
Organizational Structure (cont’d)
• Centralization
The degree to which decision making is concentrated
at upper levels in the organization.
Organizations in which top managers make all the decisions
and lower-level employees simply carry out those orders.
• Decentralization
Organizations in which decision making is pushed
down to the managers who are closest to the action.
• Employee Empowerment
Increasing the decision-making authority (power) of
employees.
9–16
Factors that Influence the Amount of
Centralization and Decentralization
• More centralization
Environment is stable.
Lower-level managers are not as capable or experienced at
making decisions as upper-level managers.
Lower-level managers do not want to have a say in decisions.
Decisions are significant.
Organization is facing a crisis or the risk of company failure.
Company is large.
Effective implementation of company strategies depends on
managers retaining say over what happens.
9–17
Factors that Influence the Amount of Centralization and
Decentralization
• More Decentralization
Environment is complex, uncertain.
Lower-level managers are capable and experienced at making
decisions.
Lower-level managers want a voice in decisions.
Decisions are relatively minor.
Corporate culture is open to allowing managers to have a say in
what happens.
Company is geographically dispersed.
Effective implementation of company strategies depends on
managers having involvement and flexibility to make decisions.
9–18
More Decentralization
More centralization
9–19
Organizational Structure (cont’d)
• Formalization
The degree to which jobs within the organization are
standardized and the extent/degree to which
employee behavior is guided by rules and
procedures.
Highly formalized jobs offer little discretion over what is to be
done.
Low formalization means fewer constraints on how
employees do their work.
Mechanistic Organization: An organizational design
that is rigid and tightly controlled
Organic Organization: An organizational design that is
highly adaptive and flexible.
9–20
Mechanistic Versus Organic Organization
9–21
Contingency Factors
• Structural decisions are influenced by:
Overall strategy of the organization
Organizational structure follows strategy.
Size of the organization
Firms change from organic to mechanistic organizations as
they grow in size.
Technology use by the organization
Firms adapt their structure to the technology they use.
Degree of environmental uncertainty
Dynamic environments require organic structures;
mechanistic structures need stable environments.
9–22
Contingency Factors (cont’d)
• Strategy and Structure
Achievement of strategic goals is facilitated by
changes in organizational structure that
accommodate and support change.
9–23
Contingency Factors (cont’d)
• Technology and Structure
Organizations adapt their structures to their
technology.
Routine technology = mechanistic organizations
Non-routine technology = organic organizations
9–24
Contingency Factors (cont’d)
• Environmental Uncertainty and Structure
Mechanistic organizational structures tend to be most
effective in stable and simple environments.
The flexibility of organic organizational structures is
better suited for dynamic and complex environments.
9–25
Common Organizational Designs
• Traditional Designs
Simple structure
Low departmentalization, wide spans of control, centralized
authority, little formalization
Functional structure
Departmentalization by function
– Operations, finance, marketing, human resources, and
product research and development
Divisional structure
Composed of separate business units or divisions with limited
autonomy under the coordination and control the parent
corporation.
9–26
Strengths and Weaknesses of Traditional
Organizational Designs
9–27
Contemporary Organizational Designs
Team Structure
• What it is: A structure in which the entire organization is made up of
work groups or teams.
• Advantages: Employees are more involved and empowered. Reduced
barriers among functional areas.
• Disadvantages: No clear chain of command. Pressure on teams to perform.
Matrix-Project Structure
What it is: A structure that assigns specialists from different functional
areas to work on projects but who return to their areas when
the project is completed. Project is a structure in which
employees continuously work on projects. As one project is
completed, employees move on to the next project.
• Advantages: Fluid and flexible design that can respond to environmental
changes. Faster decision making.
• Disadvantages: Complexity of assigning people to projects. Task and
personality conflicts.
9–28
Contemporary Organizational Designs
Boundaryless Structure
What it is: A structure that is not defined by or limited to artificial
horizontal, vertical, or external boundaries; includes virtual
and network types of organizations.
• Advantages: Highly flexible and responsive. Draws on talent wherever it’s
found.
• Disadvantages: Lack of control. Communication difficulties.
9–29
Organizational Designs (cont’d)
• Contemporary Organizational Designs
Team structures
The entire organization is made up of work groups or self-
managed teams of empowered employees.
Matrix and project structures
Specialists from different functional departments are
assigned to work on projects led by project managers.
Matrix and project participants have two managers.
In project structures, employees work continuously on
projects; moving on to another project as each project is
completed.
9–30
Organizational Designs (cont’d)
• Contemporary Organizational Designs (cont’d)
Boundaryless Organization
An flexible and unstructured organizational design that is
intended to break down external barriers between the
organization and its customers and suppliers.
Removes internal (horizontal) boundaries:
– Eliminates the chain of command
– Has limitless spans of control
– Uses empowered teams rather than departments
Eliminates external boundaries:
– Uses virtual, network, and modular organizational
structures to get closer to stakeholders.
9–31
Removing External Boundaries
• Virtual Organization
An organization that consists of a small core of full-time
employees and that temporarily hires specialists to work on
opportunities that arise.
• Network Organization
A small core organization that outsources its major
business functions (e.g., manufacturing) in order to
concentrate on what it does best.
• Modular Organization
A manufacturing organization that uses outside suppliers to
provide product components for its final assembly
operations.
9–32
Today’s Organizational Design
Challenges
• Keeping Employees Connected
Widely dispersed and mobile employees
• Building a Learning Organization
• Managing Global Structural Issues
Cultural implications of design elements
9–33
Organizational Designs (cont’d)
• The Learning Organization
An organization that has developed the capacity to
continuously learn, adapt, and change through the
practice of knowledge management by employees.
Characteristics of a learning organization:
An open team-based organization design that empowers
employees
Extensive and open information sharing
Leadership that provides a shared vision of the organization’s
future.
A strong culture of shared values, trust, openness, and a
sense of community.
9–34
Terms to Know
• organizing • mechanistic organization
• organizational structure • organic organization
• organizational chart • unit production
• organizational design • mass production
• work specialization • process production
• departmentalization • simple structure
• cross-functional teams • functional structure
• chain of command • divisional structure
• authority • team structure
• responsibility • matrix structure
• unity of command • project structure
• span of control • boundaryless organization
• centralization • virtual organization
• decentralization • network organization
• employee empowerment • learning organization
• formalization
9–35