Power System Reliability: Yangon Technological University Electrical Power Department Power System Lab
Power System Reliability: Yangon Technological University Electrical Power Department Power System Lab
OBJECTIVES
Not Only For Class But Also For Life
Learning Approach
Assessment Methods
Syllabus
way
ath
ic P Ph.D-Japan-
d em 2017
A ca
ME-Thailand-
2009
ME-MTU-2007
BE-MTU-2005
Research Interested Field
Master: Impact of Voltage Dip and Protection
System on Distribution System Reliability
Motivation
Education
Poems
https://www.facebook.com/ohnzinlinedu/
Previous Postings
Pyin Oo Lwin-
CNC Maintenance
Bae Lin-
Training Center
SELF-INTRODUCTION
Assessment Methods
TEACHING OR LEARNING?
Case Study
Exam-50 (Paper Submission)
20 %
Generation
HLI
Facilities
HLII
Transmission
Facilities
HLIII
Distribution
Facilities
Reliability Indices For Generation, HLI
percentages
Generation/transmission
132kV
low voltage
arranges shutdown
Reliability Cost and Reliability Worth
1.0
ΔR
Reliability R
ΔC
Investment Cost C
Reliability Costs
Investment
Cost
• Failure Rate - λ
• Outage Time ( Repair/Switching) – r
• Annual Outage Time – U
λs iN1 λi interruption/yr (2.1)
N
Us λi ri hr/yr (2.2)
i1
Us
rs hr/yr
λs
(2.3)
Type m a r rp S
Transformer
33/11 kV 0.05 0.015 -- 15.0 1.0
LT(11/4.4kV) ----- 0.015 200.0 10.0 1 .0
Breakers
33kV 0.002 0.0015 4.0 --- 1.0
11kV 0.006 0.0040 4.0 --- 1 .0
Bus bars
33kV 0.001 0.001 2.0 --- 1.0
11lkV 0.001 0.001 2.0 --- 1 .0
Lines
Note: Lines and 0.060
33kV Cables0.046failure8.0rates are--- in failure/yr-
2.0
km. Where LT is-----
11kV
Cables lateral0.065 5.0
transformer, --- 1.0
is momentary
11kV -----
failure
0.040
rate
30.0
(failure/yr),
--- 3.0
λi Ni
= interruption/customer/yr (2.4)
Ni
Ui Ni
= hr/customer/yr (2.5)
Ni
Ui Ni
= hr/ customer interruption /yr
λN
i i
Load- and Energy-oriented Indices
total energy demand inperiod of interest E d
La (2.7)
period of interest t
where ENS is energy not supply, L a(i) is the average load connected to load point i
and U i is outage time at load point i.
L a(i) U i
AENS (2.9)
Ni
where AENS is average energy not supply and N i is total number of customers
served.
Application to Radial System
Component (f/yr) r(hours) Load No of Average
point customer Load
s connected(k
W)
Section A 1000 5000
1 0.2 4
2 0.1 4
3 0.3 4 B 800 4000
4 0.2 4
Distributor C 700 3000
a 0.2 2
b 0.6 2
c 0.4 2 D 500 2000
d 0.2 2
Table 3‑1 Basic load point indices for example system
Load point A Load point B Load point C Load point D
Com r U r U r U r U
pone
nt
1 0.2 4 0.8 0.2 4 0.8 0.2 4 0.8 0.2 4 0.8
2 0.1 4 0.4 0.1 4 0.4 0.1 4 0.4 0.1 4 0.4
3 0.3 4 1.2 0.3 4 1.2 0.3 4 1.2 0.3 4 1.2
4 0.2 4 0.8 0.2 4 0.8 0.2 4 0.8 0.2 4 0.8
a 0.2 2 0.4 0.2 2 0.4 0.2 2 0.4 0.2 2 0.4
b 0.6 2 1.2 0.6 2 1.2 0.6 2 1.2 0.6 2 1.2
c 0.4 2 0.8 0.4 2 0.8 0.4 2 0.8 0.4 2 0.8
d 0.2 2 0.4 0.2 2 0.4 0.2 2 0.4 0.2 2 0.4
Total 2.2 2.73 6.0 2.2 2.73 6.0 1.0 2.73 6.0 2.2 2.73 6.0
System indices and energy-oriented indices
SAIFI = (2.2+2.2+2.2+2.2)/4
= 2.2 interruptons/customer yr
SAIDI = (6.0+6.0+6.0+6.0)/4
= 6.0 hours/customer yr
CAIDI = (2.73+2.73+2.73+2.73)/4
=2.73 hours/customer interruption
ENS =6 x 14MW
=84 MWh/yr
AENS=84/3000
=28 kWh/yr-customers
Reliability Improvement
• Improvement by Prospered Protection System
Conventional Protection Devices
Automation Devices (SCADA)
• Distributed Generation
• Transformer Parallel Operation/ Double
Circuit/ Replacing
• Maintenance
• Any scheme to reduce the interruptions
Reliability Improvement by Protection
System
a 0.2 2 0.4
b 0.6 2 1.2
c 0.4 2 0.8
d 0.2 2 0.4
Total 1.0 3.6 3.6 1.4 3.14 4.4 1.2 3.33 4.0 1.0 3.6 3.6
(1.0 1.4 1.2 1.0)
SAIFI
4
=1.15 interruption/customer/ yr
sum of
SAIDI
total number of loadpoints
= 3.91 hours/customer/ yr
sum of r
CAIDI
total number of loadpoints
C r U r U r U r
a 0.2 2 0.4
b 0.6 2 1.2
c 0.4 2 0.8
d 0.2 2 0.4
Total 1.0 1.5 1.5 1.4 1.89 2.65 1.2 2.75 3.3 1.0 3.6 3.6
sum of
SAIFI
total number of loadpoints
(1.0 1.4 1.2 1.0)
SAIFI
4
=1.15 interruption/customer/ yr
sum of
SAIDI
total number of loadpoints
= 2.58 hours/customer/ yr
SAIDI
CAIDI
SAIFI
2.58
CAIDI
1.15
C r U r U r U r
a 0.2 2 0.4 0.02 0.5 0.01 0.02 0.5 0.01 0.02 0.5 0.01
b 0.06 0.5 0.03 0.6 2 1.2 0.06 0.5 0.03 0.06 0.5 0.03
c 0.04 0.5 0.02 0.04 0.5 0.02 0.4 2 0.8 0.02 0.5 0.01
d 0.02 0.5 0.01 0.02 0.5 0.01 0.02 0.5 0.01 0.2 2 0.4
Tota 1.12 1.39 1.56 1.48 1.82 2.69 1.3 2.58 3.35 1.12 3.2 3.66
l
7
The additional customer- and load-orientated indices are
DG
Reliability indices with embedded generation
(capacity > 14MW, can run independently)
Load point A Load point B Load point C Load point D
C r U r U r U r
1 0.2 4 0.8 0.2 0.5 0.1 0.2 0.5 0.1 0.2 0.5 0.1
2 0.1 0.5 0.05 0.1 4 0.4 0.1 0.5 0.05 0.1 0.5 0.05
3 0.3 0.5 0.15 0.3 0.5 0.15 0.3 4 1.2 0.3 0.5 0.15
4 0.2 0.5 0.1 0.2 0.5 0.1 0.2 0.5 0.1 0.2 4 0.8
a 0.2 2 0.4
b 0.6 2 1.2
c 0.4 2 0.8
d 0.2 2 0.4
Total 1.0 1.5 1.5 1.4 1.39 1.95 1.2 1.88 2.25 1.0 1.5 1.5
sum of
SAIFI
total number of loadpoints
(1.0 1.4 1.2 1.0)
SAIFI
4
sum of
SAIDI
total number of loadpoints
SAIDI
CAIDI
SAIFI
1.8
CAIDI
1.15
C r U r U r U r
1 0.2 4 0.8 0.2 4 0.8 0.2 0.5 0.1 0.2 0.5 0.1
2 0.1 0.5 0.05 0.1 4 0.4 0.1 0.5 0.05 0.1 0.5 0.05
3 0.3 0.5 0.15 0.3 0.5 0.15 0.3 4 1.2 0.3 0.5 0.15
4 0.2 0.5 0.1 0.2 0.5 0.1 0.2 0.5 0.1 0.2 4 0.8
a 0.2 2 0.4
b 0.6 2 1.2
c 0.4 2 0.8
d 0.2 2 0.4
Total 1.0 1.5 1.5 1.4 1.89 2.65 1.2 1.88 2.25 1.0 1.5 1.5
sum of
SAIFI
total number of loadpoints
(1.0 1.4 1.2 1.0)
SAIFI
4
sum of
SAIDI
total number of loadpoints
SAIDI
CAIDI
SAIFI
1.8
CAIDI
1.15
sum of
SAIDI
total number of loadpoints
2.25
CAIDI
1.15
Generation Load
Generation Unit Unavailability
n! nout nservice
P(out ) P ( service)
(n nout )!(nout )!
Recursive Algorithm For Capacity Model
Building
Loss of Load Indices