The document discusses the history and theory behind polygraphy, which is the science of using polygraph machines to study physiological and psychological reactions to detect deception. It outlines the early methods of lie detection including trials by combat or ordeal, and describes the development of the modern polygraph machine and different types of questions used in polygraph examinations.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0 ratings0% found this document useful (0 votes)
34 views46 pages
Polygraphy For Demonstration
The document discusses the history and theory behind polygraphy, which is the science of using polygraph machines to study physiological and psychological reactions to detect deception. It outlines the early methods of lie detection including trials by combat or ordeal, and describes the development of the modern polygraph machine and different types of questions used in polygraph examinations.
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 46
POLYGRAPHY
- Is the science that deals with
the study of physiological and psychological reactions of the body with the aid of the polygraph machine. History of Polygraphy: Early Method of Detecting Deception: a. Trial by combat b. Trial by Ordeal The following are the different trial by ordeal applied to the suspects to identify deceptions. 1. The Chinese requested to chew rice powder during the interview, and then to spit it out for examination. If the rice is still dry, the suspect was considered guilty because the tension of guilt supposedly caused a cessation of salivary gland secretions.
2. Red Hot iron- this is by placing the red hot
iron the tongue, if the tongue will not get blister, the suspect is innocent. 3. Feeding to the animals-the suspect that will not be eaten by the animals is not guilty.
4. By setting fire- the suspect that will
get burn is not guilty of the crime. Theory of Lie detection. -The theory of lie detection technique is that lying necessitates certain physical effort that causes definite physiological changes. It is a recognize fact that when a person lies there is a change in his blood pressure, respiration and a change in the activity of the sweet pores.” History of Lie Detection 1895- Cesare Lombroso- utilized a scientific instrument in an effort to detect deception. He sought to determine on the basis of the presence or absence of blood pressure-pulse changes when the suspects were questioned about the offense under investigation. Since the instruments were in existence for medical purposes at the time of Lombroso conducted his experiments in detecting deception by constructing an instrument known as hydrosphygmograph. 1906- Sir James Mackenzie- a heart specialist who used the “Ink polygraph” for monitoring the blood pressure-pulse in detecting heart failures only, the machine has not been used by him in detecting deception.
1914- Vittorio Benusse- his research on the
respiration changes as symptoms of deception became popular. He discovered that the length of inspirations if divided by the length of expiration the ratio is greater before telling the truth than afterwards and greater after lying than before lying. 1915- William Moulton Marston- made a research on lie detection with the use of an ordinary sphygmomanometer he invested, an instrument capable of determining patient blood pressure by means of periodic and continuous blood pressure readings during the course of investigation.
1917- Harold Burt- confirmed the results obtained by
Benusse and improved upon his technique. He considered this respiratory method to have loss diagnostic value than the blood pressure technique.
1921- John A. Larson – constructed an instrument
capable of continuously recording all the three phenomena- the blood pressure, pulse, and respiration during the entire period of the test. Had a high percentage of accuracy in his results. 1926- Leonardo Keeler- constructed a more satisfactory instrument that the one used by Larson. A keeler polygraph was included in addition to units for recording blood pressure-pulse and respiration changes. A Galvanometer for recording what is known as the Psychological galvanic skin reflex. 1945- John E. Reid- found that various forms of unobserved muscular activity. He devised an instrument for recording along with the changes in blood pressure, pulse, respiration, and psycho-galvanic skin reflex, an accessory in the Reid polygraph machine, which is used to record, and observed muscular movements of the arms, thigh and feet. Parts of the Polygraph Machine 1. Cardiosphygmograph- blood pressure cuff 2. Pnuemograph- corrogated tubes attached to the abdomen and stomach 3. Galvanic Skin reflex- electrodes attached to the index and middle fingers 4. Kymograph- a motor that helps run the graphing tracing paper. PNUEMOGRAPH -aretwo corrugated rubbers that will be attached to the thorasic and abdomen GALVANOGRAPH -is the part of the polygraph machine that measures the flow of galvanic skin reflex. It consist of two electrodes that will be attached to the index and ring fingers. DIFFERENT PROCEDURES IN CONDUCTING POLYGRAPH EXAMINATION 1. Pre-Test Interview. The examinee’s interview with the subject prior to the test is of considerable importance, both for the purpose of: conditioning the subject for the examination in order to provide and observe the helpful indications of guilt or innocence which are often forthcoming at that time. Inform the subject regarding his constitutional rights or the Miranda doctrine. Formulation of questions 2. Preliminary Observations. Although the lie detector record themselves will usually permit a reliable diagnosis of deception, much can be gained from the preliminary observations of the subject from the time he enters the examiner’s office or deception room until he is escorted into the examination room.
The recorded observations of a competent secretary or
receptionist as to the general conduct and behavior of the subject while in the waiting room will be very useful to the examiner. They will furnish him with a clue or guide to the most effective handling of the subject, and particularly with regard to his possible resentment toward the test or other attitudes, which should be understood and perhaps alleviate before the actual administration of the test. FORMULATING DIFFERENT QUESTIONS, SUCH AS: 1.IRRELEVANT QUESTIONS 2. STRONG RELEVANT 3. WEAK RELEVANT 4. CONTROL QUESTION 5. EVIDENCE CONNECTING QUESTION 6. KNOWLEDGE QUESTION Different Kinds of Questions Irrelevant- this question is formulated without any scientific relationship with the case under investigation. This question can be asked on the first two and last two questions or immediately thereafter the relevant question is asked. Purposes of the irrelevant questions: to ascertain the subject’s normal reactions, norms, and behavior To terminate the “lingering” type of reactions that may appear in the relevant and control questions. To nullify or terminate shock reactions due to the noises occurring outside the examination room. To provide an outlet of relief response after the relevant question is asked. To separate the reactions to pertinent questions by using the irrelevant question in between. to accentuate a deception response to a relevant question (thinking his deception to the question he previously answered) Relevant Questions - this is the primary or key question used by the examiner in order to resolve a specific subject matter. This question is commonly set in number 3 and 5 to observe the psychological reaction of the guilty subjects.
Kinds of Relevant question:
Strong or Crucial question- is a relevant question having an intense and specific relationship with the crime or problem being considered. Weak or Secondary question- a question concerned with some secondary element of the crime, and deals mostly on guilt knowledge and partial involvement. Two Kinds of Weak or Secondary Question are: Specific- this question is designed to absorbed the response generally generated by the introduction of the first relevant question in a series. knowledge- designed whether the subject possesses information regarding the identity of the offender or the location of the evidence. Evidence Connecting- a question designed to stimulate the guilty subject and focus his attention on the incriminating proof that would tend to establish his guilt. The Phraseology of the Relevant Question: the question must be simple it must not be lengthy’ it must describe to only one case to avoid confusion, must be accusatory’ Must be based on facts and not by mere opinion. Hypothetical relevant questions must be set either in number 3 or in number 5. Control Question- -this question is designed to produce a response in the innocent subject and serves for evaluating the subject perceptual test.
And this question is about a wrongdoing of the same
general nature as the main incident under investigation and one to which the subject, in all probability, will lie or to which his answer will be dubious validity in his own mind. This question relates nothing to the fact in issue. This is only designed to know some linkages from one known facts to the other. It can be set at number 6 and 10 to give enough time for the subject to control his emotions before other questions are asked. Two kinds of Control Question:
Primary- a question which is more concern
about events that transpires within 3 or 5 years period before the present case under investigation. Secondary- this question is designed to cover events up to the present period. Guilt complex question- designed for subjects who are guilt complex reactor or who react to any relevant question. Example: Did you steal the attaché case containing P5,000.00 from Juan de la Cruz room. Actually the case is about the loss of the typewriter.