100% found this document useful (2 votes)
261 views24 pages

Akamai Technologies: Group 13 A Arjun P Kottana B10013 Rana Md. Jamal B10043 Mayank Gupta B10028 Vibhu Mangla B10059

Akamai Technologies is a leading provider of content delivery network and cloud services. It was founded in 1998 by computer scientists from MIT. Some key points: - Akamai pioneered the content delivery network model with its Freeflow service in 1999. This helped speed up website loading times and reduce bandwidth usage. - The company went public in 1999 but saw declining revenues after 9/11 due to economic impacts. It recovered by expanding its EdgeSuite application delivery services in 2003. - EdgeSuite allowed enterprises to accelerate and securely deliver web applications and content. This became Akamai's primary business and accounted for 60% of sales by 2003. - Akamai continued innovating by adding capabilities

Uploaded by

Rajat Goyal
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
100% found this document useful (2 votes)
261 views24 pages

Akamai Technologies: Group 13 A Arjun P Kottana B10013 Rana Md. Jamal B10043 Mayank Gupta B10028 Vibhu Mangla B10059

Akamai Technologies is a leading provider of content delivery network and cloud services. It was founded in 1998 by computer scientists from MIT. Some key points: - Akamai pioneered the content delivery network model with its Freeflow service in 1999. This helped speed up website loading times and reduce bandwidth usage. - The company went public in 1999 but saw declining revenues after 9/11 due to economic impacts. It recovered by expanding its EdgeSuite application delivery services in 2003. - EdgeSuite allowed enterprises to accelerate and securely deliver web applications and content. This became Akamai's primary business and accounted for 60% of sales by 2003. - Akamai continued innovating by adding capabilities

Uploaded by

Rajat Goyal
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 24

Akamai

Technologies

Group 13 A
Arjun P Kottana B10013
Rana Md. Jamal B10043
Mayank Gupta B10028
Vibhu Mangla B10059
Designed to handle greatest Stresses
imaginable, but demonstrated that it
could handle unimaginable
- Paul Sagan, President,
Akamai Technologies
About Akamai
O Co founder : Danny Lewin

O Leading provider of secure, outsourced e-


business infrastructure services and software

O Serves 63 countries with 13000 servers over 954


networks (2001)

O “Content Data Network” provider


CDN to ADN
O First service : Freeflow in 1999
O IPO : 1999
O Edge Suite 2003
O Edge Computing : 2003
O WTC accident – sept 11, 2001 : Impact on Akamai
O 14% drop in Akamai’s revenue from Q2-Q4,2001
O Further declining in 2002
O Consequences : cut headcount and expenses
O Loss of confidence in investors
O Decline in stock price from $345 (in 1999) to $0.56 in Oct 2002
O Success of Edgesuite (60% of sales)– Revival of growth
O New step : into application processing tasks
Internet Architecture
Bottlenecks
O Slow transaction processing
O Loss of bandwidth
O Loss of data packets (earlier – 25% to 40%)
O Delays while data is resent

Solutions
O Mirroring
O Caching
O CDN
Content Delivery Network

Edge server
Akamai Version 1.0 : FreeFlow
O Heavy Objects are tagged and dispersed
through Edge servers

O $50 K competition to Venture


Freeflow Business Model
Marketing
O Target 500 most heavily trafficked websites
O Content provider tagged the objects with Akamai servers
O Long term contracts ( 1 to 3 years)
O Switching is problem for customers
O 10 times faster loading
O Cost saving (bandwidth saving for ISPs and hosts)

Network Partners
O Free space from smaller ISPs
O 2001: 13000 servers, 63 countries, 95 networks

Competition
O From caching providers, NSPs, mirroring solutions
O Alliance with sandpiper(another CDN provider)
FreeFlow’s Success

O Akamai enjoyed great success with FreeFlow

O Successful IPO in 1999

O 72% share of $ 125mn CDN market


The Changing Environment
New competitive threat – Backbone operators such
Following the 2001 bubble burst However existing competitors were worse off as such MCI-Worldcom & AT&T

• Customer churn • Content Bridge • Because of over-


rate jumped to mired in capacity started
22% from 11% members delivering value-
squabbles added services
• Smaller CDN including content
rivals were delivery
unable to raise
capital

Fund Shortage at Akamai


• Many Companies raised huge sums during the boom preceding the dot-com bubble burst

• However Akamai couldn’t go for secondary offerings because of SEC’s delay in approval

• Over $500mn cash outlay in Capex and losses in 2001 (In 2000, issued convertible debt
of $300mn)
EdgeSuite
Idea
O Based on Federal Express and UPS success,“a product that
would allow them to take over functions that customers
thought were strategic”
O Developed a plan that would facilitate assembly, presentation
and delivery of customer’s Internet data and applications

Edgesuite - The service created


•Employed Edge Side Includes, a mark-up language
•To accelerate the dynamic assembly and delivery of web-
based applications

For example – Airline ticket prices, stock quotes,
weather reports
Advantages over traditional CDN
Target Customers services
O Traditional customers O Better Performance in terms of

with content-rich websites speed – Atleast double on


average
O Enterprise customers that
O Origin website cost savings - 2
relied on Internet to year return on investment from
distribute information and these savings was > 100%
provided Web-based O Bandwidth savings –
applications Substantial reduction in data
transfer
O Scalability – Could handle
‘flash crowds’
O Security – In case of denial-of
service attacks
The success early-on
O Akamai anticipated Edgesuite customer to spend four times more

than they did on FreeFlow


O Better margins because existing servers installed for FreeFlow

would be used
O Complemented with FreeFlow in terms of data processing and

storage
O Accounted for 20% of revenues in Q4, 2001

O 152 customers – Almost half were new, included huge corporations

like Apple, Coca-Cola, Novartis, etc


EdgeSuite: Implementation Stage
 Opportunity to broaden target market beyond content driven
website to include large enterprise
 Decision to be made
• Upgrade its own sales force OR
• Rely on its resellers that had strong relationships within
the large corporation

Sales Challenge

 Enterprise market required new sales skill


 Dealing with corporate IT – Cost center and not a revenue
center
 Shift from “Nice to have” to “Need to have”
 First time faced with Consultative sale
EdgeSuite: Implementation Stage
Roles for Partners

Always relied on partners to resell “FreeFlow”


 System Integrators
 Hosting firms
 Network carriers

 Big role of Alliance partners to separate out Business Logic frm


Presentation Logic
 Business Logic – How data is stored and processed?
 Presentation Logic – How page components-, outputs of business logic,
are assembled by web servers and routed to users
 What partners offered??
 Technical expertise
 Skills
 Relationships in the enterprise market

 Akamai did not increase its dependence on resellers


EdgeSuite: Performance through 2003
Edgesuite was successful by 2003

 Accounted for 60% revenue


 Customer base increased by 18%
 Biggest customer – Microsoft – accounted for 20% revenue
 Demise of CDN – Market share increased by 80%
 14,733 servers in 1072 networks across 71 countries

Financials for Q4 2003

 Revenue – $45.2 m, up by 28% (Q4 2002)


 Positive Net Income for the first time
 CAPEX declined by 6%, Server prices dropped sharply

FY 2004
Revenue - $ 187 M
Operating Income - $ 31 M
EBITDA - $ 54 M
EdgeSuite: Version 3.0
Edgesuite – Evolution of CDN into AND

AND Along with functionalities of CDN delivery of Application processing


and databases, e.g Online retailing transaction

In 2003

 Concept to Commercial service of ADN


 EdgeComputing customers could run Java Applications build on IBM’s
WebSphere software development tools from Akamai Edge servers

By 2004

 Dozen customers running Java applications

Decisions faced
 Which applications to focus on?
 Which softwares companies should they team with?
Applications
O Requirements
O Sophisticated and influential early adopter
O At least 1000 customers willing to pay
thousands of dollars per month
O Eligible applications
O Dealer locators, Enterprise search, E-commerce
suites, CRM
Partners
O Existing software firms
O IBM (WebSphere), Microsoft (.NET), HP
(Adaptive Enterprise), Sun (ONE) etc
O Provided platforms with proprietary features
O Web Services built using other platforms
Microsoft
O Microsoft
O Biggest customer
O Decided not to enter the service businesses
O IBM
O Java based WebSphere platform
O Largest reseller
O Java development in Akamai was slightly ahead
of .NET
Acquisitions
O Netli (Web application accelerator)
O $177 million acquisition in 2007
O Increased speed and reliability

O Acerno (Behavioral Advertising Company)


O $95 million acquisition in 2008
O Basis for ADS (Advertising decision solutions)
O Trying to build ADS as the third major revenue
stream
Performance so far
O Revenue grew at 32%
O Operating Profit Margin 26% (2009)
O 28% of revenue from outside US
O Avg webpage complexity doubled and size
tripled
O Increasing demand of Online Videos
O Start quickly
O No delays or Rebuffering messages
THANK YOU

You might also like