Addis Ababa University: Course: Environmental Planning
Addis Ababa University: Course: Environmental Planning
Lecture-3
Presentation Contents
Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA)
Introduction
EIA
Procedures in EIA
• Since that time, most countries have adopted EIA processes to examine the
social and environmental consequences of projects prior to their execution
For example;
EIA should:
1) project concept
2) prefeasibility
3) feasibility
5) implementation; and
Prediction, and
Assessment
5. Traffic Impacts: The impact on traffic during the construction phase is expected
to increase congestion, particularly at the entry and exit points, and the presence
of maintenance vehicles, machinery and staff on the road.
Project Proponent
Consultant
Interested and affected parties
Decision Maker (e.g. EPA)
EIA PROCESS
Prescreening
Screening
Scoping
Reviewing
Monitoring
Initial
Scoping environmental
examination
Impact analysis
Mitigation
and impact
management
*Public involvement
Resubmit EIA report
*Public involvement typically
occurs at these points.
It may also occur at any
Redesign Review other stage of the EIA Process
Approved
Information from this process
contributes to effective EIA in the future
Implementation
and post-EIA
monitoring
SCREENING
What is screening?
No EIA required
Screening tools (methods)
Legal/policy definition
Project lists:
Case-by-case examinations:
Combination of above
Typical proposals requiring a full EIA
Considers alternatives
be considered
EIA report
demand alternatives
activity alternatives
location alternatives
process alternatives
scheduling alternatives
Who should be involved in scoping?
o proponent
o EIA consultant
o affected public
o interested public
EIA ‘ToR’ to be included in outline
Alternatives to be examined
approach to be taken
Screening
Scoping
The review complies with terms of reference for the EIA Report.
Internal review
Features:
Features:
Allocate resources.
1. An aid to decision-making
• EIA is a process with several important purposes.
• It is an aid to decision-making.
• For the decision-maker it provides a systematic examination of the
environmental implications of a proposed action, program or project and
sometimes alternatives, before a decision is taken.
checklists
matrices
networks
expert systems
professional judgement
Example of a checklist
For Water Supply and Sanitation Projects
Aspects of EIA Checkli st Questi ons Yes No Addi tional
Wi ll the pr oject: Data needs
Sour ces of I mpacts 1. Require t he acquis it ion or c onv ers ion of s ignificant areas
of land for res erv oir/t reatment work s etc . (e.g. > 50 ha
rural, > 5 ha urban)?
2. Res ult in s ignific ant quantities of eroded material, effluent
or s olid was tes ?
Envir onmental Impacts 8. Caus e a not ic eable permanent or s eas onal reduct ion in
the v olume of ground or s urf ac e water s upply ?
Miti gation Measur es 13. Be lik ely to require mit igation meas ures that may res ult in
the projec t being financially or s ocially unac c ept able?
Comments
Signature: Delegation. .. ... .. .... ... ... .. ... ... .... ... ... .. ... Des k ... .. ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... .. ... .
Main advantages and disadvantages of impact identification methods
ADVANTAGES DISADVANTAGES
Checkl i sts • simple to underst and • do not di sti ngui sh
–si mpl e and use bet ween di rect and
–ranki ng • go od for si te sel ect i on i ndi rect i mp act s
and and priori ty set t i ng • do not l ink acti on and
wei ghting i mp act
• t he process of
i ncorpo rat i ng val ues
can be cont roversial
Matrices • li nk acti o n t o i mp act • di ffi cult t o di st in gu ish
• go od met hod fo r di rect and i nd irect
di spl ayi n g EIA resul ts i mp acts
• sig ni fican t po t ent ial
for do ubl e-cou nt ing o f
i mp acts
Networks • li nk acti o n t o i mp act • can become very
• useful in si mpl i fi ed complex if used bey ond
fo rm for checki ng for simpl ifi ed v ersion
second o rder i mpact s
• han dles d irect an d
in di rect i mpact s
Overla ys • easy to u nderst and • address onl y di rect
• go od di spl ay met hod i mp acts
• go od sit i ng tool • do not address impact
durat i on or probabi l i ty
GIS and • excel l ent for i mp act • heavy rel ian ce on
computer id ent i ficati on and kno wledge an d d ata
expert anal ysi s • oft en comp lex and
systems
• go od for ‘experi ment in g’ expen si ve
Impact characteristics can vary in
reversibility/irreversibility
IMPACT
air quality health etc
CHARACTERISTIC
nature
magnitude
extent/location
timing
duration
reversibility
likelihood (risk)
significance
Health impacts
Examples of health impacts by sector
Communicable Non Nutrition Injury Psychosocial
disease communicable disorder and
disease loss of well-
being
Mining Tuberculosis Dust induced Crushing Labour migration
lung disease
Agriculture Parasitic Pesticide Loss of
infections poisoning subsistence
Industry Poisoning by Occupational Disempowerment
pollutants injury
Forestry Loss of food Occupational
production injury
Dams and Water borne Poisoning by Increased food Drowning Involuntary
irrigation diseases pollutants production displacement
schemes
Transportation HIV/Aids Heart disease Traffic injury Noise and
induced stress
Energy Indoor air Electromagnetic Community
pollution radiation displacement
earning
capital investment
outputs
Common (desirable)
Alternative sites or
Avoidance technology to
eliminate habitat loss
Actions during
design, construction and
Mitigation operation to minimise
or eliminate habitat
loss
resettlement plans
This is to inform the public about these activities & include their
ideas/knowledge in those devt activities, programs or policies.
informing stakeholders
government agencies
NGOs
screening
determining the need for, and level, of EIA
scoping
identifying the key issues and alternatives
impact analysis
identifying the significant impacts and mitigating measures
review
commenting on/responding to the EIA report
be flexible