Scribd
Upload
54 views22 pages

User Interface Design: (Lecture 7)

1. Command language interfaces require users to type commands using a defined language, while menu-based interfaces present options visually for selection. 2. Command language interfaces are easier to develop but more difficult to learn and use, while menu-based interfaces are simpler for casual users but cannot compose complex commands. 3. Large interfaces require structuring options like scrolling, walking, and hierarchical menus to organize numerous choices.

Uploaded by

jatinder
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
54 views22 pages

User Interface Design: (Lecture 7)

1. Command language interfaces require users to type commands using a defined language, while menu-based interfaces present options visually for selection. 2. Command language interfaces are easier to develop but more difficult to learn and use, while menu-based interfaces are simpler for casual users but cannot compose complex commands. 3. Large interfaces require structuring options like scrolling, walking, and hierarchical menus to organize numerous choices.

Uploaded by

jatinder
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 22

User Interface Design

(Lecture 7)

Dr. R. Mall
Command Language-Based
Interface

 As the name itself suggests:


 incorporates some language to form
commands.
 Users frame the required
commands in the language:
 type them in whenever required.
Design of command language
interface

 Simple command language


interface:
 determine all the commands
needed to be supported
 assign unique names to the
different commands.
Design of command language
interface

 A more sophisticated command


language interface:
 allow users to compose primitive
commands to form more complex
commands.
Consider cat x.dat|grep 123
 Like a programming language.
Command Language-Based
Interface

 The facility to compose commands:


 dramatically reduces the number of command
names users would have to remember.
 Commands can be made concise
requiring minimal typing by the user.
 allow faster interaction with the computer
 simplify input of complex commands.
Advantages of Command Language
Interfaces

 Easy to develop:
 compiler writing techniques are
well developed.
 Can be implemented even on cheap
alphanumeric terminals.
 Much more efficient:
 compared to other types of
interfaces.
Disadvantages of Command
Language Interfaces

 Difficult to learn:
 Require the user to memorize primitive
commands.
 Require the user to type in commands.
 Users make errors while:
 formulating commands in the command
language
 typing them in.
Disadvantages of Command
Language Interfaces

 All interactions are through key-board:


 cannot take advantage of effective
interaction devices such as a mouse.
 For casual and inexperienced users,
command language interfaces are not
suitable.
Issues in Designing a Command
Language Interface

 Design of a command language interface:


 involves several issues.
 The designer has to decide
 what mnemonics are to be used for the
commands.
 mnemonics should be meaningful
yet be concise to minimize the amount of typing
required.
Issues in Designing a Command
Language Interface

 The designer has to decide:


 whether users will be allowed to redefine
command names to suit their own
preferences.
Letting a user define his own mnemonics
for various commands is a useful feature,
but increases complexity of user interface
development.
Issues in Designing a Command
Language Interface

 Designer has to decide:


 whether it should be possible to
compose primitive commands to
create more complex commands.
 syntax and semantics of command
composition options has to be
clearly and unambiguously decided.
Issues in Designing a Command
Language Interface

 The ability to combine


commands is a powerful facility
for experienced users:
 but quite unnecessary for
inexperienced users.
Menu-Based Interface
 Advantages of a menu-based interface
over a command language interface:
 users are not required to remember
exact command names.
 typing effort is minimal:
menu selections using a pointing device.
This factor becomes very important for the
occasional users who can not type fast.
Menu-Based Interface
 For experienced users:
 menu-based interfaces is slower
than command language interfaces
 experienced users can type fast
 also get speed advantage by
composing simple commands into
complex commands.
Menu-Based Interface

 Composition of commands in a
menu-based interface is not
possible.
 actions involving logical connectives
(and, or, all, etc.)
awkward to specify in a menu-based
system.
Menu-Based Interface

 If the number of choices is large,


 it is difficult to design a menu-based
interface.
 Even moderate sized software needs
hundreds or thousands of menu choices.
 A major problem with the menu-based
interface:
 structuring large number of menu
choices into manageable forms.
Structuring Menu Interface

 Any one of the following options


is adopted to structure menu
items.
 Walking menu
 Scrolling menu
 Hierarchical menu
Scrolling Menu

 Used when the menu options are


highly related.
For example text height selection in a
word processing software.
 Scrolling of menu items
lets the user to view and select the
menu items that can not be
accommodated on one screen.
Walking Menu

 Walking menu is commonly used


to structure large menu lists:
 when a menu item is selected,
 it causes further menu items to be
displayed adjacent to it in a
submenu.
Walking Menu

 A walking menu can successfully


structure commands only if:
 there are tens rather than hundreds of
choices
 each adjacently displayed menu does
take up some screen space
the total screen area is after all limited.
Hierarchical menu

 Menu items are organized in a


hierarchy or tree structure.
 Selecting a menu item causes the
current menu display to be replaced by
an appropriate submenu.
 One can consider the menu and its
various submenu to form a hierarchical
tree-like structure.
Hierarchical menu

 Walking menu are a form of


hierarchical menu:
 practicable when the tree is shallow.
 Hierarchical menu can be used to
manage large number of choices,
 but, users face navigational
problems
lose track of where they are in the
menu tree.

You might also like