Database Recovery 1 Purpose of Database Recovery To bring the database into the last consistent state,
which existed prior to the failure.
To preserve transaction properties (Atomicity, Consistency, Isolation and Durability). Example:
If the system crashes before a fund transfer
transaction completes its execution, then either one or both accounts may have incorrect value. Thus, the database must be restored to the state before the transaction modified any of the accounts.
Database Recovery 2 Types of Failure The database may become unavailable for use due to Transaction failure: Transactions may fail because of incorrect input, deadlock, incorrect synchronization. System failure: System may fail because of addressing error, application error, operating system fault, RAM failure, etc. Media failure: Disk head crash, power disruption, etc.
Database Recovery 5 Data Caching Data items to be modified are first stored into database cache by the Cache Manager (CM) and after modification they are flushed (written) to the disk. The flushing is controlled by Modified and Pin- Unpin bits. Pin-Unpin: Instructs the operating system not to flush the data item. Modified: Indicates the AFIM of the data item.
Database Recovery Write-Ahead Logging When in-place update (immediate or deferred) is used
then log is necessary for recovery and it must be available
to recovery manager. This is achieved by Write-Ahead Logging (WAL) protocol. WAL states that For Undo: Before a data item’s AFIM is flushed to the database disk (overwriting the BFIM) its BFIM must be written to the log and the log must be saved on a stable store (log disk). For Redo: Before a transaction executes its commit operation, all its AFIMs must be written to the log and the log must be saved on a stable store.
Database Recovery 7 Checkpointing Time to time (randomly or under some criteria) the database flushes its buffer to database disk to minimize the task of recovery. The following steps defines a checkpoint operation: 1. Suspend execution of transactions temporarily. 2. Force write modified buffer data to disk. 3. Write a [checkpoint] record to the log, save the log to disk. 4. Resume normal transaction execution. During recovery redo or undo is required to transactions appearing after [checkpoint] record.
Database Recovery Steal/No-Steal and Force/No-Force Possible ways for flushing database cache to database disk: 1. Steal: Cache can be flushed before transaction commits. 2. No-Steal: Cache cannot be flushed before transaction commit. 3. Force: Cache is immediately flushed (forced) to disk. 4. No-Force: Cache is deferred until transaction commits These give rise to four different ways for handling recovery: Steal/No-Force (Undo/Redo) Steal/Force (Undo/No-redo) No-Steal/No-Force (Redo/No-undo) No-Steal/Force (No-undo/No-redo)
Database Recovery 8 Recovery Scheme Deferred Update (No Undo/Redo)
The data update goes as follows:
A set of transactions records their updates in the log. At commit point under WAL scheme these updates are saved on database disk. After reboot from a failure the log is used to redo all the transactions affected by this failure. No undo is required because no AFIM is flushed to the disk before a transaction commits.
Database Recovery Deferred Update in a single-user system There is no concurrent data sharing in a single user system. The data update goes as follows: A set of transactions records their updates in the log. At commit point under WAL scheme these updates are saved on database disk. After reboot from a failure the log is used to redo all the transactions affected by this failure. No undo is required because no AFIM is flushed to the disk before a transaction commits.
Database Recovery Deferred Update with concurrent users This environment requires some concurrency control
mechanism to guarantee isolation property of
transactions. In a system recovery transactions which were recorded in the log after the last checkpoint were redone. The recovery manager may scan some of the transactions recorded before the checkpoint to get the AFIMs.
Database Recovery Deferred Update with concurrent users Two tables are required for implementing this protocol: Active table: All active transactions are entered in this table. Commit table: Transactions to be committed are entered in this table.
During recovery, all transactions of the commit table are
redone and all transactions of active tables are ignored since none of their AFIMs reached the database. It is possible that a commit table transaction may be redone twice but this does not create any inconsistency because of a redone is “idempotent”, that is, one redone for an AFIM is equivalent to multiple redone for the same AFIM.
Database Recovery Recovery Techniques Based on Immediate Update Undo/No-redo Algorithm
In this algorithm AFIMs of a transaction are flushed
to the database disk under WAL before it commits. For this reason the recovery manager undoes all transactions during recovery. No transaction is redone. It is possible that a transaction might have completed execution and ready to commit but this transaction is also undone.
Database Recovery Recovery Techniques Based on Immediate Update Undo/Redo Algorithm (Concurrent execution)
Recovery schemes of this category applies undo and also
redo to recover the database from failure.
In concurrent execution environment a concurrency control is required and log is maintained under WAL. Commit table records transactions to be committed and
active table records active transactions. To minimize the
work of the recovery manager checkpointing is used. The recovery performs: Undo of a transaction if it is in the active table. Redo of a transaction if it is in the commit table.