Global English: Class 10 Communicative Competence: Part Two

Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 33

Global English

Class 10
Communicative competence: Part Two

1
Communicative competence

Misunderstanding due to different


communicative competence rules (intra -
and inter-culturally)

e.g., reactions to offers:


• English ‘thank you’ = yes, thank you

• French ‘merci’ = no, thank you


• Polish ‘dziekuje’ = no, thank you
2
Communicative competence

Misunderstanding due to the use of different


styles:
Conversational style differences
e.g. - get down to business
- use ‘small talk’ and then get down to
business
- cultural and individual differences
with respect to inviting people to drink and eat

- differences within English (how many


times do you offer something?)
3
Communicative competence

When an offer is rejected, do you say “are you


sure?”, “you don’t want anything?”

Invitations to visit: how many times does an


invitation need to be rejected not to be
extended again?

Getting a letter from an old aunt complaining


about health; how do you react?
4
Communicative competence

Patterns of complimenting
Compliment: «You’ve got a nice sweater»
Response: Thank you.
Oh, it’s an old rag.
Oh, I am glad you like it,
but it’s an old rag.
Do you really like it?
etc……

5
Communicative competence

The further apart (culturally) the interlocutors


are the bigger the danger of misinterpretation
(misunderstanding); but that danger exists also
within close networks, small communities (e.g.
families, work groups, groups of friends)

e.g. at dinner table, the person sitting next to


you asks you many questions about yourself;
is it ‘concern’ or ‘inquisitiveness’?

6
Communicative competence

When is interest interrogation? When is


concern inquisitiveness?

Asking no questions = lack of concern,


timidity, non-imposition (?)

7
Communicative competence

Remembering other people’s (and their


children’s) names and personal details:

when is it an expression of genuine concern?

when is it a skill allowing manipulation?

when is it neither of the two?

8
Communicative competence

Praising other people; praising A in the


presence of C

Does it mean that C is not so good as A?

9
Communicative competence

Fuzzy cases

10
Communicative competence

The likelihood of
misinterpretation/misunderstanding in
writing, in face to face conversation, in
non face to face conversation (e.g. in
telephone conversation)

11
Communicative competence

BEWARE of ambiguity while


communicating on the Internet!

NOTE: When something significant is at


stake writing may not be sufficient;
people then want to talk over the phone,
or, preferably, face to face. Why is this?

12
Communicative competence

Our ways of understanding and


communicating seem self-evident to us.

13
Communicative competence

We usually don’t know that there has


been a misunderstanding

Misunderstanding is normal, not


something special.

14
Communicative competence

Nonverbal behavior rules

15
Communicative competence

Kinesics

16
Communicative competence

Face behavior

17
Communicative competence

Gaze

18
Communicative competence

Proxemics

19
Communicative competence

Haptics

20
Communicative competence

Posture:
Socio-petal orientation
Socio-fugal orientation

21
Communicative competence

Silence

22
Communicative competence

Asian speakers (following Confucius): ‘Those


who know do not speak. Those who speak do
not know’.

Western speakers: ‘Those who know speak


out’. Western cultures celebrate talk. In spite of
the proverb ‘Silence is golden’, silence is
regarded negatively in most interactive
situations. Talk is powerful. Even brief pauses
can be interpreted as rejection when they
occur in a response position.
23
Communicative competence

When in doubt Westerners tend to resort


to ‘small talk’, rather than staying silent.

Western speakers sometimes interpret


Chinese silence as a lack of ideas, and
Chinese speakers sometimes consider
Western participants’ interruptions as not
allowing others to express their ideas.

24
Communicative competence

Organizing physical space


Westerners tend to opt for individual offices or cubicles, and often
mark their space with items that show individual ownership: a
telephone, a personal computer, photographs of the family. In
contrast, the Japanese choose common offices, with everyone
from the same section sitting in the same large room.

25
Communicative competence

Violating sociolinguistic (both verbal and


nonverbal) rules shows how important
they are.

26
Communicative competence

Conversational maxims
The maxim of quality
The maxim of quantity
The maxim of relevance (cf. the function
of background knowledge)
The maxim of manner

27
Communicative competence

The relative openness of sociolinguistic rules vs. the relative rigidity of


grammatical rules

Grammar - Standard English: Where are you going now?

Discourse - Standard English: Could you close the door


please?
Do you think you could close
the door?
Would it be ok if we closed the
door?
Do you mind closing the door?
How about if you closed the
door?
etc……

28
Communicative competence

The awareness of how conversation


works and the ability to manipulate other
people (e.g. the use of a name; the use
of the first name vs. second name)

29
Communicative competence

Sociolinguistic rules and «real life problems»

30
Communicative competence

People believe that problems may be


solved by talking about things, but if
people don’t share meanings of words
and conversational styles, talking makes
things worse! We then tend to think that
there is something wrong with our
relationship. Then you tend to blame the
other party, not the process of
communication (language) or yourself.

31
Communicative competence

The most important points to remember:

1. Verbal and non-verbal (sociolinguistic) behavior is


rule-governed.
2. Our communicative competence allows us to use
the sociolinguistic rules as (more or less) expected
in a given speech community.
3. There is significant intra-cultural and inter-cultural
misunderstanding (miscommunication) due to the
differences in expected sociolinguistic behavior.
4. We should be very careful about not jumping to
conclusions about others in terms of evaluations like
‘dominating’, ’manipulative’, impolite’.

32
Communicative competence

END OF PRESENTATION

33

You might also like