Chap 3 Personality and Values
Chap 3 Personality and Values
Organizational Behavior
14th Edition
Kelli J. Schutte
William Jewell College
5-1
Chapter Learning Objectives
5-2
What is Personality?
5-3
Personality Determinants
• Heredity
• Factors determined at conception: physical stature, facial attractiveness,
gender, temperament, muscle composition and reflexes, energy level, and
bio-rhythms
• This “Heredity Approach” argues that genes are the source of personality
• Twin studies: raised apart but very similar personalities
• There is some personality change over long time periods
5-4
Personality Traits
5-5
The Myers-Briggs Type Indicator
• Most widely used instrument in the world.
• Participants are classified on four axes to determine one of 16
possible personality types, such as ENTJ.
5-6
The Types and Their Uses
5-7
The Big Five Model of Personality
Dimensions
5-8
How Do the Big Five Traits Predict
Behavior?
• Research has shown this to be a better framework.
• Certain traits have been shown to strongly relate to higher job
performance:
• Highly conscientious people develop more job knowledge, exert greater
effort, and have better performance.
• Other Big Five Traits also have implications for work.
• Emotional stability is related to job satisfaction.
• Extroverts tend to be happier in their jobs and have good social skills.
• Open people are more creative and can be good leaders.
• Agreeable people are good in social settings.
See
SeeEEXXHHIIBBIITT 5–1
5–1
5-9
Values
•Attributes of Values:
• Content Attribute – that the mode of conduct or end-state is important
• Intensity Attribute – just how important that content is
•Value System
• A person’s values rank ordered by intensity
• Tends to be relatively constant and consistent
5-10
Importance of Values
• Provide understanding of the attitudes, motivation, and behaviors
• Influence our perception of the world around us
• Represent interpretations of “right” and “wrong”
• Imply that some behaviors or outcomes are preferred over others
5-11
Classifying Values – Rokeach Value
Survey
• Terminal Values
• Desirable end-states of existence; the goals that a person would like to
achieve during his or her lifetime
• Instrumental Values
• Preferable modes of behavior or means of achieving one’s terminal values
5-12
Value Differences Between Groups
Source: Based on W. C. Frederick and J. Weber, “The Values of Corporate Managers and Their Critics: An Empirical Description and Normative Implications,”
in W. C. Frederick and L. E. Preston (eds.) Business Ethics: Research Issues and Empirical Studies (Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, 1990), pp. 123–44.
EEXXHHIIBBIITT 5-4
5-4
5-13
Linking Personality and Values to the
Workplace
Managers are less interested in someone’s ability to do a specific job
than in that person’s flexibility.
•Person-Job Fit:
• John Holland’s Personality-Job Fit Theory
• Six personality types
• Vocational Preference Inventory (VPI)
• Key Points of the Model:
• There appear to be intrinsic differences in personality between people
• There are different types of jobs
• People in jobs congruent with their personality should be more satisfied and have lower
turnover
5-14
Relationships Among Personality Types
EEXXHHIIBBIITT 5-7
5-7
5-15
Still Linking Personality to the Workplace
•Person-Organization Fit:
• The employee’s personality must fit with the organizational culture.
• People are attracted to organizations that match their values.
• Those who match are most likely to be selected.
• Mismatches will result in turnover.
• Can use the Big Five personality types to match to the organizational culture.
5-16
Global Implications
• Personality
• Do frameworks like Big Five transfer across cultures?
• Yes, but the frequency of type in the culture may vary.
• Better in individualistic than collectivist cultures.
• Values
• Values differ across cultures.
• Hofstede’s Framework for assessing culture – five value dimensions:
• Power Distance
• Individualism vs. Collectivism
• Masculinity vs. Femininity
• Uncertainty Avoidance
• Long-term vs. Short-term Orientation
5-17
Hofstede’s Framework: Power Distance
The extent to which a society accepts that power in institutions and
organizations is distributed unequally.
•Low distance
•Relatively equal power
between those with
status/wealth and those
without status/wealth
•High distance
•Extremely unequal power
distribution between those
with status/wealth and those
without status/wealth
• Individualism
• The degree to which people prefer to act as individuals rather than as member
of groups
• Collectivism
• A tight social framework in which people expect others in groups of which
they are a part to look after them and protect them
Versus
5-19
Hofstede’s Framework: Masculinity
• Masculinity
• The extent to which the society values work roles of achievement, power, and
control, and where assertiveness and materialism are also valued
• Femininity
• The extent to which there is little differentiation between roles for men and
women
Versus
5-20
Hofstede’s Framework: Uncertainty
Avoidance
The extent to which a society feels threatened by uncertain and
ambiguous situations and tries to avoid them
5-21
Hofstede’s Framework: Time Orientation
• Long-term Orientation
• A national culture attribute that emphasizes the future, thrift, and persistence
• Short-term Orientation
• A national culture attribute that emphasizes the present and the here and now
5-22
Hofstede’s Framework: An Assessment
• There are regional differences within countries
• The original data is old and based on only one company
• Hofstede had to make many judgment calls while doing the research
• Some results don’t match what is believed to be true about given
countries
• Despite these problems it remains a very popular framework
5-23
GLOBE Framework for Assessing
Cultures
5-24
Summary and Managerial Implications
• Personality
• Screen for the Big Five trait of conscientiousness
• Take into account the situational factors as well
• MBTI® can help with training and development
• Values
• Often explain attitudes, behaviors, and perceptions
• Higher performance and satisfaction achieved when the individual’s values
match those of the organization
5-25