0% found this document useful (0 votes)
78 views33 pages

Key Advances in Coalbed Methane Technolo GY

The document discusses key advances in coalbed methane technology including improved understanding of fundamentals, advances in measuring reservoir properties, and advances in reservoir simulation. Three key technological advances are identified: improved understanding of production fundamentals, advances in measuring reservoir properties like permeability and gas content, and advances in reservoir simulation. Coalbed methane production involves desorption of gas from coal matrix and flow through fractures. Maintaining low backpressure on wells is important for increasing recovery.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
78 views33 pages

Key Advances in Coalbed Methane Technolo GY

The document discusses key advances in coalbed methane technology including improved understanding of fundamentals, advances in measuring reservoir properties, and advances in reservoir simulation. Three key technological advances are identified: improved understanding of production fundamentals, advances in measuring reservoir properties like permeability and gas content, and advances in reservoir simulation. Coalbed methane production involves desorption of gas from coal matrix and flow through fractures. Maintaining low backpressure on wells is important for increasing recovery.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 33

KEY ADVANCES IN COALBED METHANE TECHNOLO

GY

 The tax incentives plays an important role pro


moting coalbed methane development in the
World, however, new technology was the prim
ary driver in making coalbed methane a comm
ercial success.
 Price incentives or tax incentives were availabl
e for coalbed methane production from 1978 t
hrough the early 1980s, yet, significant develo
pment did not begin until 1987 in USA.
 The coalbed methane research has prod
uced three key technological advances i
n reservoir engineering:

An Improved Understanding of the Fundament


als of Coalbed Methane Production

Advances in Measuring Reservoir Properties

Advances in Reservoir Simulation


Understanding the Fundamentals of Co
albed Methane Production

 Initially, research focused on understandi


ng the fundamental differences between
coalbed methane and conventional reser
voirs.
 The understanding of coalbed methane
has advanced so that reservoir engineer
s can evaluate new properties and mana
ge production from existing wells over th
e long term
To successfully produce coalbed methane
wells, it is essential to

 identify factors that control production in


coal reservoirs.
 understand the relationship between gas
content and sorption isotherm for specifi
c developments, and
 maintain low backpressure on wells to in
crease recovery. Each of these points is
discussed below.
Factors that Control Production in Coal
Reservoirs

 Production of gas is controlled by a three


step process i.e desorption of gas from t
he coal matrix, diffusion to the cleat syst
em, and flow through fractures
Relationship Between Gas Content and
Sorption Isotherm

 Another mechanism that controls production is


the relationship of gas content to sorption isoth
erm.

 The sorption isotherm defines the relationship


of pressure to the capacity of a given coal to h
old gas at a constant temperature. Gas conten
t is a measurement of the actual gas contained
in a given coal reservoir
 A coal reservoir is undersaturated if the a
ctual gas content is less than the isother
m value at reservoir temperature and pre
ssure.

 Accurate measurements of both gas con


tent and the isotherm are required to esti
mate the production profile of the well
Maintaining Low Backpressure on Wells

 Gas production will not initiate until reser


voir pressure falls below the point where
the gas content of the coal is in equilibriu
m with the isotherm
 If the gas content of the reservoir is belo
w the isotherm, then the reservoir will pr
oduce only water initially.

 Because of the relationship between gas


desorption and reservoir pressure, it is i
mportant to produce coalbed methane w
ells at the lowest practical pressure.
Advances in Measuring Reservoir Prope
rties.

 In 1982, few references were available o


n testing coalbed methane wells.

 Research on coalbed methane well testi


ng has produced several useful findings:
 Coal permeability is very sensitive to stre
ss conditions. When performing injection
/falloff tests on coal seams it is important
to inject at very low rates to avoid fracturi
ng the coal and to minimize stress effect
s.
 High skin factors often are encountered
when testing coal seams, especially whe
n testing a cemented and cased well.
 The high skin factor often can be elimina
ted by performing a breakdown treatmen
t or small stimulation before testing.
 Absolute permeability of coal natural frac
ture systems can be estimated from well
tests performed under multiphase flow c
onditions if accurate relative permeability
curves are available.
A wide variety of tests can be used to evalu
ate coalbed methane wells

 These include production or injection drill


stem tests, cased-hole production and inj
ection tests, slug tests, tank tests, and te
sts combined with production logging.
Advances in Reservoir Simulation.

 In 1980, GRI sponsored research to dev


elop a coalbed methane reservoir model
and define coalbed methane production
mechanisms.

 Today, more than fifty coalbed methane s


imulators have been described in literatu
re reviews.
Integrated GRI reservoir studies in the San J
uan Basin and Black Warrior Basin have pro
duced the following key results:
 The most important properties to measure are
coal thickness, cleat permeability, gas content,
and the sorption isotherm.

 Natural fracture (cleat) porosity in the San Jua


n basin is much lower than originally thought
(0.25 percent vs. 2.0-4.0 percent). Lower poro
sity implies lower water production and dispos
al costs.
 Permeability estimated from well tests ge
nerally correlates well with permeability p
redicted by simulators.

 Coal seam reservoir properties are heter


ogeneous and can vary widely from field
to field and in some cases from well to w
ell.
 Bottomhole pressure data and individual zone
production data can give increased confidence
when history matching single well and field cas
es.
 Relative permeability curves generated from th
e history match process tend to be steeper tha
n core derived curves. Though core derived pe
rmeability curves can be used as a starting poi
nt, curves generated through history matching
may provide a truer representation of the reser
voir.
METHANE EMISSIONS IN MINING

 Natural ventilation (cracks in coal layers


and adjoining rocks)
 Coal mine emissions
 Underground mines
 Surface coal mining
 Coal enrichment, transportation and usa
ge
Methane recovery from coal seams provide
s a number of benefits.

 frequent accidents

 can be recovered and sold

 reduce greenhouse gas emissions.

 substitute for fuel.


 Methane emissions from coal mines can
be reduced by recovering and using met
hane from underground mines and by ox
idating of methane from ventilation air.
 methane recovered from underground mi
nes may be sold to natural gas compani
es, used to generate electricity, used on-
site as fuel for drying coal,.
 The oxidization of coal mine ventilation a
ir produces heat that can be used directl
y on-site or to produce electricity.

 The oxidization technology has been suc


cessfully demonstrated in Great Britain.
 Carbon dioxide emissions per unit of ele
ctricity generated are typically in the orde
r of:
Brown Coal: 1,180 tonnes per GWh
Black coal: 25 tonnes per GWh
Coalbed methane: 600 tonnes per GWh
USES OF COAL BED METHANE

 Mine boilers – switching from coal to ga


s:
 Motor fuel
 Cleaning of recovered substances and m
ethane supply to natural gas pipelines
 Electricity generation (diesel generators,
gas turbines, internal-combustion engine
s)
 Supporting mine operations
 Sales to the power grid
 Technological raw materials (metallurgy,
fertilizers, methanol)
 Community needs (heat and electricity) o
f adjacent territories
INDIAN SCENARIO
 Essar initiated the first CBM project in India.

 Targeting the deep coals of Cambay Basin of


Gujarat, Essar started the project at Mehsana.

 Essar is today indigenously producing methan


e form one of the three wells drilled
 India's Directorate General of Hydrocarb
on (DGH) has identified nine blocks in fo
ur states - Gujarat, Jharkhand, Madhya
Pradesh and West Bengal for exploration
and production of CBM that will be offere
d for bidding.
 Fields No. of Blocks
 1. Raniganj (3)
 2. Jharia (2)
 3. E. Bokaro & W. Bokaro (2)
 4. Satpura (1)
 5. Singrauli -
 6. Sohagpur (2)
 7. Talcher
 8.Chanda-Wardha
 9.Godavari Valley
 10.Tertiary Coal fields of NE
 11.Gujarat (Sub-Surface Coal)
 12.Neyveli Lignite
 13.J & K Coal Fields
 14.Palana-Rajasthan
 Accordingly, a Coal Bed Methane (CBM) Explo
itation Project has been formulated by the DG
H with the help of the Ministry of Petroleum an
d Natural Gas.
 The project involves four phases :
Phase 1 : Exploration
Phase 2 : Pilot Assessment and Market
Confirmation
Phase 3 : Development
Phase 4 : Production
 In the immediate context only Phase 1 is
being considered and, to start with, the s
hallow depth coalbeds of the Lower Gon
dwanas of the eastern and central parts
of Peninsular India will be on offer.
 The areal extent of these beds is of the o
rder of 11000 sq. kms, made up of :

 2800 sq. kms in the Raniganj, Jharia, Ea


st Bokaro and West Bokaro coal fields in
the Damodar Valley belt; and,
 8200 sq. kms in the Sohagpur and Satpu
tra coal fields of Central India.

You might also like