0% found this document useful (0 votes)
37 views32 pages

Slide 2

This document discusses various techniques for network security including symmetric encryption, cryptographic terminology, symmetric cipher models, encryption algorithms, cryptanalysis techniques like brute force attacks, classical substitution ciphers like the Caesar cipher and monoalphabetic cipher, transposition ciphers like the rail fence cipher, and the concepts of the one-time pad and its security. It provides definitions and examples of different encryption methods and how they can be attacked through cryptanalysis.

Uploaded by

Junaid Khan
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
37 views32 pages

Slide 2

This document discusses various techniques for network security including symmetric encryption, cryptographic terminology, symmetric cipher models, encryption algorithms, cryptanalysis techniques like brute force attacks, classical substitution ciphers like the Caesar cipher and monoalphabetic cipher, transposition ciphers like the rail fence cipher, and the concepts of the one-time pad and its security. It provides definitions and examples of different encryption methods and how they can be attacked through cryptanalysis.

Uploaded by

Junaid Khan
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 32

Network Security

Symmetric Encryption

• or conventional / private-key / single-key


• sender and recipient share a common key
• all classical encryption algorithms are private-key

- -
Some Basic Terminology

• plaintext - original message


• ciphertext - coded message
• cipher - algorithm for transforming plaintext to ciphertext
• key - info used in cipher known only to sender/receiver
• encipher (encrypt) - converting plaintext to ciphertext
• decipher (decrypt) - recovering ciphertext from plaintext
• cryptography - study of encryption principles/methods
• cryptanalysis (codebreaking) - study of principles/ methods of deciphering
ciphertext without knowing key
• cryptology - field of both cryptography and cryptanalysis

- -
Symmetric Cipher Model

- -
Requirements

• two requirements for secure use of symmetric encryption:


– a strong encryption algorithm
– a secret key known only to sender / receiver
• mathematically have:
Y = EK(X)
X = DK(Y)
• assume encryption algorithm is known
• implies a secure channel to distribute key

- -
Cryptography

• characterize cryptographic system by:


– type of encryption operations used
• substitution / transposition / product
– number of keys used
• single-key or private / two-key or public
– way in which plaintext is processed
• block / stream

- -
Cryptanalysis

• objective to recover key not just message


• general approaches:
– cryptanalytic attack (key with some knowledge of plain + cipher)
– brute-force attack

- -
More Definitions
• unconditional security
– no matter how much computer power or time is available, the cipher
cannot be broken since the ciphertext provides insufficient information
to uniquely determine the corresponding plaintext
• computational security
– given limited computing resources (eg time needed for calculations is
greater than age of universe), the cipher cannot be broken

- -
Brute Force Search

• always possible to simply try every key


• most basic attack, proportional to key size
• assume either know / recognise plaintext

Key Size (bits) Number of Alternative Keys Time required at 1 decryption/µs Time required at 106 decryptions/µs

32 232 = 4.3  109 231 µs = 35.8 minutes 2.15 milliseconds

56 256 = 7.2  1016 255 µs = 1142 years 10.01 hours

128 2128 = 3.4  1038 2127 µs = 5.4  1024 years 5.4  1018 years

168 2168 = 3.7  1050 2167 µs = 5.9  1036 years 5.9  1030 years

26 characters 26! = 4  1026 2  1026 µs = 6.4  1012 years 6.4  106 years
(permutation)

- -
Classical Substitution Ciphers

• where letters of plaintext are replaced by other letters or by


numbers or symbols
• or if plaintext is viewed as a sequence of bits, then substitution
involves replacing plaintext bit patterns with ciphertext bit
patterns

- -
Caesar Cipher

• earliest known substitution cipher


• by Julius Caesar
• first attested use in military affairs
• replaces each letter by 3rd letter on
• example:
meet me after the toga party
PHHW PH DIWHU WKH WRJD SDUWB

- -
Caesar Cipher

• can define transformation as:


abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz
DEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZABC

• mathematically give each letter a number


abcdefghij k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25

• then have Caesar cipher as:


c = E(p) = (p + k) mod (26)
p = D(c) = (c – k) mod (26)

- -
Monoalphabetic Cipher

• rather than just shifting the alphabet


• could shuffle (jumble) the letters arbitrarily
• each plaintext letter maps to a different random ciphertext letter
• hence key is 26 letters long

Plain: abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz
Cipher: DKVQFIBJWPESCXHTMYAUOLRGZN

Plaintext: ifwewishtoreplaceletters
Ciphertext: WIRFRWAJUHYFTSDVFSFUUFYA

- -
Monoalphabetic Cipher Security

• now have a total of 26! = 4 x 1026 keys


• with so many keys, might think is secure
• but would be !!!WRONG!!!
• problem is language characteristics

- -
Language Redundancy and Cryptanalysis

• human languages are redundant


• eg "th lrd s m shphrd shll nt wnt"
• letters are not equally commonly used
• in English E is by far the most common letter
– followed by T,R,N,I,O,A,S
• other letters like Z,J,K,Q,X are fairly rare
• have tables of single, double & triple letter frequencies for various
languages

- -
YE CUE AUSGBK AM REXGWFEU C AEQA IEAD DEE YE XCB TE DHXXEERER.

- -
English Letter Frequencies

- -
Use in Cryptanalysis
• key concept - monoalphabetic substitution ciphers do not change relative
letter frequencies
• discovered by Arabian scientists in 9th century
• calculate letter frequencies for ciphertext
• compare counts/plots against known values
• if caesar cipher look for common peaks/troughs
– peaks at: A-E-I triple, NO pair, RST triple
– troughs at: JK, X-Z
• for monoalphabetic must identify each letter
– tables of common double/triple letters help

- -
Example Cryptanalysis

• given ciphertext:
UZQSOVUOHXMOPVGPOZPEVSGZWSZOPFPESXUDBMETSXAIZ
VUEPHZHMDZSHZOWSFPAPPDTSVPQUZWYMXUZUHSX
EPYEPOPDZSZUFPOMBZWPFUPZHMDJUDTMOHMQ
• count relative letter frequencies (see text)
• guess P & Z are e and t
• guess ZW is th and hence ZWP is the
• proceeding with trial and error finally get:
it was disclosed yesterday that several informal but
direct contacts have been made with political
representatives of the viet cong in moscow

- -
Vigenère Cipher

• simplest polyalphabetic substitution cipher


• effectively multiple caesar ciphers
• key is multiple letters long K = k1 k2 ... kd
• ith letter specifies ith alphabet to use
• use each alphabet in turn
• repeat from start after d letters in message
• decryption simply works in reverse

- -
Example of Vigenère Cipher

• write the plaintext out


• write the keyword repeated above it
• use each key letter as a caesar cipher key
• encrypt the corresponding plaintext letter
• eg using keyword deceptive
key: eceptivedeceptivedeceptive
plaintext: wearediscoveredsaveyourself
ciphertext:ZICVTWQNGRZGVTWAVZHC
QYGLMGJ

- -
Security of Vigenère Ciphers

• have multiple ciphertext letters for each plaintext letter


• hence letter frequencies are obscured
• but not totally lost
• start with letter frequencies
– see if look monoalphabetic or not
• if not, then need to determine number of alphabets, since then
can attach each

- -
Autokey Cipher
• ideally want a key as long as the message
• Vigenère proposed the autokey cipher
• with keyword is prefixed to message as key
• knowing keyword can recover the first few letters
• use these in turn on the rest of the message
• but still have frequency characteristics to attack
• eg. given key deceptive
key: deceptivewearediscoveredsav
plaintext: wearediscoveredsaveyourself
ciphertext:ZICVTWQNGKZEIIGASXSTSLVVWLA

- -
One-Time Pad

• if a truly random key as long as the message is used, the cipher will be
secure
• called a One-Time pad
• is unbreakable since ciphertext bears no statistical relationship to the
plaintext
• since for any plaintext & any ciphertext there exists a key mapping one
to other
• can only use the key once though
• problems in generation & safe distribution of key

- -
Transposition Ciphers

• now consider classical transposition or permutation ciphers


• these hide the message by rearranging the letter order
• without altering the actual letters used
• can recognise these since have the same frequency distribution
as the original text

- -
Rail Fence cipher

• write message letters out diagonally over a number of rows


• then read off cipher row by row
• eg. write message out as:
m e m a t r h t g p r y
e t e f e t e o a a t
• giving ciphertext
MEMATRHTGPRYETEFETEOAAT

- -
Row Transposition Ciphers

• a more complex transposition


• write letters of message out in rows over a specified number of
columns
• then reorder the columns according to some key before
reading off the rows
Key: 3421567
Plaintext: a t t a c k p
os tpone
dunt i l t
woamxyz
Ciphertext: TTNAAPTMTSUOAODWCOIXKNLYPETZ

- -
Product Ciphers

• ciphers using substitutions or transpositions are not secure because of


language characteristics
• hence consider using several ciphers in succession to make harder, but:
– two substitutions make a more complex substitution
– two transpositions make more complex transposition
– but a substitution followed by a transposition makes a new much harder cipher
• this is bridge from classical to modern ciphers

- -
Rotor Machines

• before modern ciphers, rotor machines were most common complex


ciphers in use
• widely used in WW2
– German Enigma, Allied Hagelin, Japanese Purple
• implemented a very complex, varying substitution cipher
• used a series of cylinders, each giving one substitution, which rotated and
changed after each letter was encrypted
• with 3 cylinders have 263=17576 alphabets

- -
Hagelin Rotor Machine

- -
Steganography

• an alternative to encryption
• hides existence of message
– using only a subset of letters/words in a longer message marked in
some way
– using invisible ink
– hiding in LSB in graphic image or sound file
• has drawbacks
– high overhead to hide relatively few info bits

- -
Summary

• have considered:
– classical cipher techniques and terminology
– monoalphabetic substitution ciphers
– cryptanalysis using letter frequencies
– Playfair cipher
– polyalphabetic ciphers
– transposition ciphers
– product ciphers and rotor machines
– stenography

- -

You might also like