CH 3 Behavior in Organizations
CH 3 Behavior in Organizations
CH 3 Behavior in Organizations
Chapter 2
Behavior in Organizations
Goal Congruence
External factors are norms of desirable behavior that exist in the society of which
the organization is a part. These norms include a set of attitudes, often
collectively referred to as the work ethic, which is manifested in employees’
loyalty to the organization, their diligence, their spirit, and their pride in doing a
good job (rather than just putting in time).
Some of these attitudes are local—that is, specific to the city or region in which
the organization does its work.
Other attitudes and norms are industry-specific.
Internal Factors
Culture: The most important internal factor is the organization’s own culture—the common
beliefs, shared values, norms of behavior, and assumptions that are implicitly accepted and
explicitly manifested throughout the organization.
Management Style: The internal factor that probably has the strongest impact on
management control is management style.
The Informal Organization: The lines on an organization chart depict the formal
relationships—that is, the official authority and responsibilities—of each manager.
Perception and Communication: In working toward the goals of the organization, operating
managers must know what these goals are and what actions they are supposed to take to
achieve them.
The Formal Control System
Rules: all types of formal instructions and controls, including standing instructions, job
descriptions, standard operating procedures, manuals, and ethical guidelines.
Rules range from the most trivial (e.g., paper clips will be issued only on the basis of a
signed requisition) to the most important (e.g., capital expenditures of over $5 million must
be approved by the board of directors).
Some rules are guides, some rules are positive requirements that certain actions be taken.
Others are prohibitions against unethical, illegal, or other undesirable actions. Finally,
there are rules that should never be broken under any circumstances.
Specific types of rules
A firm’s strategy has a major influence on its structure. The type of structure, in turn,
influences the design of the organization’s management control systems.
Although organizations come in all sizes and shapes, their structures can be grouped into
three general categories:
1. A functional structure, in which each manager is responsible for a specified function such
as production or marketing.
2. A business unit structure, in which business unit managers are responsible for most of the
activities of their particular unit, and the business unit functions as a semi-independent part
of the company.
3. A matrix structure, in which functional units have dual responsibilities.
Functional Organizations
The rationale for the functional form of organization involves the notion of a manager who
brings specialized knowledge to bear on decisions related to a specific function, as contrasted
with the general-purpose manager who lacks that specialized knowledge.
There are several disadvantages to a functional structure:
1. In a functional organization there is no unambiguous way of determining the effectiveness
of the separate functional managers.
2. If the organization consists of managers in one function who report to higher-level
managers in the same function, then a dispute between managers of different functions can
be resolved only at the top.
3. Functional structures are inadequate for a firm with diversified products and markets.
4. Functional organizations tend to create “silos” for each function, thereby preventing cross-
functional coordination in areas such as new product development.
Business Units
If the business unit controller works primarily for the business unit manager, there is the
possibility that he or she will not provide completely objective reports on business unit
budgets and business unit performance to senior management.
On the other hand, if the business unit controller works primarily for the corporate
controller, the business unit manager may treat him or her as a “spy from the front office,”
rather than as a trusted aide.
Regardless of the reporting relationships, it is expected that the controller will not condone
or participate in the transmission of misleading information or in the concealment of
unfavorable information. The overall ethical responsibilities inherent in the position do not
countenance such practices.
Case 3-1
Question:
1. What is Southwest’s strategy? What is the basis on which Southwest builds its competitive
advantage?
2. How do Southwest’s control systems help execute the firm’s strategy?