On Bubble Deck Slab

Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 16

BUBBLE DECK SLAB RAMAN PANDEY

00225507917
CONTENTS
 INTRODUCTION

 LITERATURE REVIEWS

 BUBBLE DECK SLAB AND ITS TYPES

 MATERIALS USED AND ITS STRUCTURAL PROPERTIES

 ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES

 APPLICATIONS

 CONCLUSION
INTRODUCTION
IMAGES
LITERATURE REVIEWS
 IN 1990’S JORGEN BREUNING INVENTED THE WAY TO LINK AIR SPACE & STEEL
WITHIN BIAXIAL CONCRETE SLAB.

 IN 2009, TINA LAI DISCUSSED ABOUT THE ACOUSTIC BEHAVIOUR OF BUBBLE


DECK SLAB.

 IN 2010 S ANUSHA C.H MOUNIKA & PURNACHANDRA CONDUCTED STUDIES ON


THE FIRE RESISTANCE OF BUBBLE DECK SLAB.

 IN 2012 STUDY WAS CONDUCTED BY AMER M IBRAHIM, NAZAR K ALI, WISSAM


DI SALMAN ON FLEXURAL CAPACITIES.

 IN 2012 PRABHU TEJA , P VIJAY KUMAR STUDIES DURABILITIES OF BUBBLE DECK


SLAB EXPLAINED ON THE BASIS OF CREEP & SHRINKAGE.
BUBBLE DECK SLAB
 BUBBLE Deck Slab is a method of virtually eliminating

concrete from the middle of a floor slab not performing


any structural function.

 Bubble Deck Slab is a biaxial hollow core slab which


involves void formation in the middle of flat slab by
means of plastic spheres.

 This system allow for the realization of longer spans, more


rapid & less expensive erection.
 The ratio of the diameter of plastic spheres to the
thickness of slab is such that a 35% saving is achieved on
the material or concrete consumption.

 Bubble Deck Slab is new innovative and sustainable floor


system and can reduce total project cost by three percent.
TYPES OF BUBBLE DECK SLAB
 Type a – Filigree elements

 Type b – Reinforcement modules

 Type c – Finished Planks


MATERIALS USED
 CONCRETE (20mm aggregates)

 STEEL (Fe 500)

 PLASTIC SPHERES (HDPE)


STRUCTURAL PROPERTIES
 COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH & FLEXURAL CAPACITIES

 SHEAR STRENGTH

 DEFLECTION

 SOUND INSULATION

 FIRE RESISTANCE

 VIBRATION
ADVANTAGES
 MATERIAL & WEIGHT REDUCTION

 STRUCTURAL PROPERTIES

 CONSTRUCTION & TIME SAVING

 COST SAVING

 GREEN DESIGN
DISADVANTAGES
 AMOUNT OF LIVE LOAD SHOULD BE LIMITED OVER
THE DEAD LOAD.

 LIVE LOAD APPLIED SHOULD BE RELATIVELY STATIONARY.


APPLICATIONS
CONCLUSION
 THIS INNOVATIVE SLAB CONSTRUCTION TECHNOLOGY IS
PROVEN TO BE MORE EFFICIENT THAN TRADITIONAL
BIAXIAL CONCRETE SLAB.

 WEIGHT REDUCTION IS 35% COMPARED TO SOLID SLAB.

 BENDING STRESSES IN BUBBLE DECK SLAB ARE FOUND


TO BE 6.43% LESSER THAN THAT OF A SOLID SLAB.

 SHEAR RESISTANCE OF BUBBLE DECK SLAB IS 0.6 TIMES THE


SHEAR RESISTANCE OF THE SOLID SLAB OF SAME THICKNESS.
REQUIRED RESISTANCE CAN BE ACHIEVED BY PROVIDING
VERTICAL REINFORCEMENT.

 DEFLECTION OF BUBBLE DECK IS 5.88% MORE THAN SOLID SLAB


AS STIFFNESS IS REDUCED DUE TO HOLLOW PORTION.
REFRENCES
• WWW.SCRIBD.COM

• WWW.DALIFORM.COM

• WWW.GOOGLE.COM

• WWW.STUDYMAFIA.COM

You might also like