0% found this document useful (0 votes)
184 views20 pages

Monitoring and Evaluation Final

Regular monitoring of health programs involves systematic and purposeful observation, data collection on all aspects of the program, and measuring progress toward objectives. This provides feedback to stakeholders and informs decision-making to improve the project. Monitoring ensures activities are carried out properly and identifies any problems. It is an ongoing process used for planning and taking corrective actions if needed.
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
184 views20 pages

Monitoring and Evaluation Final

Regular monitoring of health programs involves systematic and purposeful observation, data collection on all aspects of the program, and measuring progress toward objectives. This provides feedback to stakeholders and informs decision-making to improve the project. Monitoring ensures activities are carried out properly and identifies any problems. It is an ongoing process used for planning and taking corrective actions if needed.
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 20

Dr.

Ritu Agrawal
Medical Consultant,
NIHFW, New Delhi
 Regular observation (Systematic & Purposeful)
 Recording of activities on all aspects of the

programme (Data Collection)


 Measurement of progress towards

programme objective
 Feedback to the donors, implementers and

beneficiaries
 Reporting of gathered information to be used

in decision making for improving the project


Evaluation Yes
GOALS&OBJECTIVES

No Assessment
of health need

Monitoring

Establish
goals
Implementation PLANNING CYCLE &objectives
of programme

Assessment
of resources
Time
frame

Select the Design Establishment


Action
best alternative of priorities
plan
alternative programme

3
GOALS_
 Describes the hoped for result of a programme

 Are achieved over a long period of time

 Through the combined efforts of multiple programme

OBJECTIVES-
 Specific results to be achieved

 Time bound

 Details the desired results/accomplishments of the

programme
 S- SPECIFIC
 M-MEASURABLE
 A-ATTAINABLE
 R-RELEVANT
 T-TIME
• Important for project planning &implementation
• Analyzing the situation in the community
• Determining whether the inputs are well utilized
• Identifying problems in the project
• Ensuring all activities are carried out properly by
the right people and in time
• Using lessons from previous project
• Determining whether the way project was
planned is the most appropriate way of solving
the problem at hand
 Preparation of action plan
 The plan should specify what needs to be done, who is

going to do it, and when it is to be done


 Inadequacy in planning will result in inadequacy in

monitoring
 The plan should identify key result areas and define

how they will be measured


 The plan should specify prioritize activities, so that

they receive adequate emphasis during monitoring


 The plan should cater to local variations

7
 Detecting deviations from plans

 Diagnosing causes for


deviations

 Taking corrective action

8
 INPUT-Resources going into conducting and carrying out
the project. Staff, finance , materials and time
 PROCESS-Set of Activities in which programme resources
(human and financial) are used to achieve the result (NO. of
workshops or training session )
 OUTPUTS-Immediate results obtained by the programme
through the execution of activities (no. of staff trained)
 Measuring how much, how many, quantity
 Tends to document number associated with
programme
 Focuses on which and how often programme
elements are carried out
 Tends to involve record keeping and numerical
counts
 Monitoring and its associated activities should be
integrated into the project timeline
 How well the programmes are carried out
 EX. Changes in people attitude towards the

programme, behaviour change , how


information permeates the at-risk society
 Works also as a Feedback System
 METHODS-
 Open ended methods to investigate
Provides a means to assess the quality of
the project and programme
implementation
 Compliments quantitative, input-output

progress monitoring
 Is a tool for institute learning and taking

corrective action in innovative and


adaptive projects
 Managers at top level
◦ They have to develop health plans based on objectives, goals,
devise strategy and allocate necessary resources
 Managers at the middle level
◦ They are more concerned with whether they are getting
desired output from the inputs that are being utilized
 Managers at the operational level
◦ They have to supervise actual operations and to ensure that
planned activities are being carried out as per schedule

13
• Will be discussed in detail tomorrow
 Monitoring involves counting what we are
doing.
 Monitoring involves routinely looking at the

quality of our services.


 Evaluation requires study design.
 Evaluation sometimes requires a control or

comparison group.
 Evaluation involves measurements over time.
 Evaluation involves special studies.
INDICATORS
 OPERATIONAL
 RELIABLE
 VALID
 SPECIFIC
 SENSITIVE
 AFFORDABLE
 FEASIBLE

16
 To describe information to be measured
 Monitoring is EXPENSIVE & TIME CONSUMNG
 For Reporting and Analysis in Simplest form
 To generate important information
 For management decision making
 Words like improved ,increased , gained do

not belong to an indicator


• Information unit of measurement
documentation of change
• Evidence of how much has been or has not
been achieved
1. Qualitative (Narrative/Observation)
2. Quantitative (Number/%)
• Anything you can think to measure
Thank You
Monitoring Evaluation
 It determines  It determines Programme
Programme efficiency effectiveness
 It establishes standard  It identifies inconsistencies
of performance at the between the programme
activity level objectives and activities
 It forms a basis for  It alerts the management of
Programme discrepancies between
accountability
actual and anticipated levels
 It alerts the of programme impact
management of
discrepancy
 It suggests changes in
programme procedures,
 It identifies strong
&weak points of operation and objectives
programme operations  It identifies the possible side
effects of the programme

20

You might also like