The bargaining power of OPPO's suppliers is low due to OPPO's large number of globally dispersed suppliers that it can easily switch between. The bargaining power of buyers is low to moderate due to many competitors and low switching costs moderated by OPPO's quality and loyalty. The threat of substitutes is low to moderate due to many competing brands making similar low-cost products. The threat of new entrants is low due to barriers like investment, branding, and distribution needed to compete with OPPO's strong position. The level of competitive rivalry is strong with intense competition between major competitors like Huawei, iPhone, and Samsung for market share in the saturated industry.
The bargaining power of OPPO's suppliers is low due to OPPO's large number of globally dispersed suppliers that it can easily switch between. The bargaining power of buyers is low to moderate due to many competitors and low switching costs moderated by OPPO's quality and loyalty. The threat of substitutes is low to moderate due to many competing brands making similar low-cost products. The threat of new entrants is low due to barriers like investment, branding, and distribution needed to compete with OPPO's strong position. The level of competitive rivalry is strong with intense competition between major competitors like Huawei, iPhone, and Samsung for market share in the saturated industry.
The bargaining power of OPPO's suppliers is low due to OPPO's large number of globally dispersed suppliers that it can easily switch between. The bargaining power of buyers is low to moderate due to many competitors and low switching costs moderated by OPPO's quality and loyalty. The threat of substitutes is low to moderate due to many competing brands making similar low-cost products. The threat of new entrants is low due to barriers like investment, branding, and distribution needed to compete with OPPO's strong position. The level of competitive rivalry is strong with intense competition between major competitors like Huawei, iPhone, and Samsung for market share in the saturated industry.
The bargaining power of OPPO's suppliers is low due to OPPO's large number of globally dispersed suppliers that it can easily switch between. The bargaining power of buyers is low to moderate due to many competitors and low switching costs moderated by OPPO's quality and loyalty. The threat of substitutes is low to moderate due to many competing brands making similar low-cost products. The threat of new entrants is low due to barriers like investment, branding, and distribution needed to compete with OPPO's strong position. The level of competitive rivalry is strong with intense competition between major competitors like Huawei, iPhone, and Samsung for market share in the saturated industry.
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 7
PORTES FIVE ANALYSIS
Bargaining Power of Suppliers: low
The bargaining power of OPPO suppliers is low. Its products are made globally in 12 countries in 590 factories. While individual suppliers are small in size, they do not have the ability of forward integration either. This reduces the chances of competition from suppliers. Moreover, the number of suppliers is high and they are scattered throughout the world. It is why individual suppliers cannot exert any pressure on OPPO. The brand sets standards for its suppliers to comply with. If a supplier does not meet to the standards, OPPO can easily switch to another. However, in such a case, the supplier would be losing a major source of revenue. Overall, OPPO holds strong control over its suppliers and audits them regularly. Bargaining power of buyers: low to moderate The bargaining power of Nike’s buyers is low to moderate. The number of its competitors is not so small and not very large. Apart from Samsung and IPHONE there are other competitors like VIVO and Panasonic. There are many other local and international brands also that compete with OPPO. The switching costs for customers are low. To some extent this force is moderated by the quality and marketing of OPPO’s products. OPPO focuses on performance ,design and the beauty of technology. It is why it has been able to build good customer loyalty. This reduces the bargaining power of individual buyers which is low to moderate. Threat of substitutes: low to moderate
The threat of substitute products is moderate for
OPPO. It is because a large number of competing brands make similar or matching products. There are several brands in local and international markets that make low priced smartphone compared to OPPO. These brands offer lower priced substitute products for OPPO. To some extent this threat is moderated by the quality and design of OPPO products. Overall, the threat from substitute products is moderate. Threat of new entrants: Low
The threat of new entrants for OPPO can be considered low to
moderate. It is because while the investment for starting the business is not very large, still there are other requirements that are not easy to fulfil. Apart from production, there are marketing, distribution and supply chain management that require investment, skilled workers and time. Building a brand image and equity are also difficult. These factors moderate the threat from the new entrants. For any new brand, it is not possible to create the kind of brand image like OPPO in a short span of time. It takes time, efforts and capital investment. OPPO’s strong position in the market mitigates the threat to a large extent. Based on these factors the threat from new entrants is low. Level of Competitive Rivalry: Strong
The level of competition in the sports industry is strong. Some of the major competitors of OPPO are Huawei, IPHONE and Samsung. The industry has grown saturated and the existing players are engaged in tough competition for deeper market penetration and to snatch away market share from each other. Brands invest a lot in marketing and other things. The number of top players and direct competitors of OPPO is low, however that makes the competition even intense. Overall, the level of competition in the industry is strong. COMPETITORS