Chapter 4 Controlling Material Flow
Chapter 4 Controlling Material Flow
1. MRP
2. JIT
1
1. Material Requirement Planning
(MRP)
Independent versus Dependent Demand
Independent Demand
automobiles, televisions, cartons
of ice cream
demand often occurs at constant
rate
Dependent Demand
most raw materials,
components, and subassemblies
demand often occurs in lumps
MRP is designed when lumps in
demand are known
Example: The Boardsports Company
Production time: 1 week
Component Quantity Lead Time
Wheel 2 1 week
Locknut 2 1 week
Spindle 1 2 weeks
Skateboard Product Tree
Material Requirements of Sidewalk Special
Fiberglass boards = 1 number of specials
Wheel assemblies = 2 number of specials
Wheels = 2 number of wheel assemblies
Spindles = 1 number of wheel assemblies
Locknut = 2 number of wheel assemblies
Wheel mount stand = 1 number of wheel assemblies
Material Required to Produce 50 SS
Fiberglass boards =1 number of specials = 1 50 = 50
Wheel assemblies =2 number of specials = 2 50 = 100
Wheels =2 number of wheel assemblies = 2 100 = 200
Spindles =1 number of wheel assemblies = 1 100 = 100
Locknut = 2 number of wheel assemblies = 2 100 = 200
Wheel mount stand =1 number of wheel assemblies= 1 100 = 100
Delivery 50 Sidewalk Specials in Week 10
Week
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Sidewalk Specials 50
Date needed 50
Boards Order date 50 3 week lead time
Date needed 100
Wheel assembly Order date 100
Date needed 200
Wheels Order date 200
Date needed 100
Spindles Order date 100
Date needed 100
Mounting stands Order date 100
Date needed 200
Locknuts Order date 200
Schematic of MRP System
Master Production Schedule
Based on actual customer orders and predicted demand
Indicates When and How many end items will be produced
Example: MPS for a family of chairs
April May
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Level 1
Week 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Gross requirements 50
On hand 20 20 20 40 40 40 40 40 40 40
Net requirements 10
Planned order receipts 20
Planned order releases 10
Lead time = 4 weeks
Example
Level 1 –legs
Week 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Gross Requirement 72 160
Opening Stock 40 40 40 40
Net Requirements 32 160
Place order 32 160
Scheduled deliveries 32 160
Example
Level 1 –tops
Week 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Gross Requirement 18 40
Opening Stock 22 22 22 22 4 4
Net Requirements 36
Place order 36
Scheduled deliveries 36
There are no more of levels material, so we can finalize the time tables of events as
• Week 2: order 32 legs
Level 1 –legs
Week 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Gross Requirement 72 160
Opening Stock 40 40 40 40
Net Requirements 32 160
Place order 32 160
Scheduled deliveries 32 160
Level 1 –tops
Week 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Gross Requirement 18 40
Opening Stock 22 22 22 22 4 4
Net Requirements 36
Place order 36
Scheduled deliveries 36
Benefits of MRP
Low levels with savings in capital, space, warehousing, and so on
Higher stock turnover
Better customer service – limit delays caused by shortages of
materials
More reliable and faster delivery times
Less time spent on expediting and emergency orders
Ability to track material requirements
Ability to evaluate capacity requirements
MRP schedules can be used for planning other logistics activities.
Issues of MRP
Reduced flexibility to deal with changes
Needs a lot of detailed and reliable information
Systems may become very complex
The order sizes suggested by MRP could be inefficient
MRP may not recognize capacity and other constraints
Could be expensive and time consuming to implement
Risks: quantity & lead time
Capacity limit
2. Just-In-Time (JIT)
PRINCIPLES OF JUST-IN-TIME
JUST-IN-TIME (JIT) systems organize materials to
arrive just as they are needed.
Bad
Design
Lengthy Poor
Setups Quality
Machine
Inefficient Unreliable
Breakdown
Layout Supplier
Lower Levels of Inventory to Expose
Problems
Bad
Design
Lengthy Poor
Setups Quality
Machine
Inefficient Unreliable
Breakdown
Layout Supplier
Minimizing Waste: JIT Production
WHAT IT IS WHAT IT DOES
• Employee participation
• Industrial engineering/basics • Stable environment
• Continuing improvement
• Total quality control
• Small lot sizes
Stock
levels
with
different
types of
control
Wider Effects of JIT
Stocks: As we have seen, organizations hold stocks to cover short-term
differences between supply and demand. JIT assumes that these stocks
actually hide problems. Organizations should find the reasons for
differences between supply and demand, and then take whatever action
is needed to remove them.
Lead times: Long lead times encourage high stocks, as they have
to cover uncertainty until the next delivery. JIT aims for small,
frequent deliveries with short lead times.
Deliveries of materials are made directly to the assembly line at just the
time they are needed. Suppliers must be able to adapt to this kind of
operation. It would be impractical to bring each individual unit from
suppliers, so the next best thing is to use very small batches.
Kanbans
There are several ways of using kanbans. The most common system uses
two distinct types of card, a production kanban and a conveyance kanban.
Production Kanban: signals the need to produce more parts
Conveyance Kanban (also called a “Move" or a “Withdrawal” kanban):
signals the need to withdraw parts from one work center and deliver them to
the next work center
Kanban Cards
Example:
Conveyance Kanban Card
Materials required:
Material no. 744B Storage location: NW48C
Part no. B238-5 Storage location: NW47B
Single-Card Kanban System
Receiving post
Kanban card for Storage
product 1 area
Kanban card for
product 2
Empty containers
Assembly line 1
O2
Fabrication
cell
O1 O3
Assembly line 2
Full containers
O2
Single-Card Kanban System
Receiving post
Kanban card for Storage
product 1 area
Kanban card for
product 2
Empty containers
Assembly line 1
O2
Fabrication
cell
O1 O3
Assembly line 2
Full containers
O2
Single-Card Kanban System
Receiving post
Kanban card for Storage
product 1 area
Kanban card for
product 2
Empty containers
Assembly line 1
O2
Fabrication
cell
O1 O3
Assembly line 2
Full containers
O2
Single-Card Kanban System
Receiving post
Kanban card for Storage
product 1 area
Kanban card for
product 2
Empty containers
Assembly line 1
O2
Fabrication
cell
O1 O3
Assembly line 2
Full containers
O2
Single-Card Kanban System
Receiving post
Kanban card for Storage
product 1 area
Kanban card for
product 2
Empty containers
Assembly line 1
O2
Fabrication
cell
O1 O3
Assembly line 2
Full containers
O2
Single-Card Kanban System
Receiving post
Kanban card for Storage
product 1 area
Kanban card for
product 2
Empty containers
Assembly line 1
O2
Fabrication
cell
O1 O3
Assembly line 2
Full containers
O2
Empty containers
Assembly line 1
O2
Fabrication
cell
O1 O3
Assembly line 2
Full containers
O2
W
W
W
W
The Main Features of Kanban Systems
A message is passed backwards to the preceding workstation to start
production, and it only makes enough to fill a container.
Standard containers are used which hold a specific amount. This
amount is usually quite small, and is typically 10% of a day’s needs.
The size of each container is the smallest reasonable batch that can be
made, and there are usually only one or two full containers at any point.
A specific number of containers and kanbans is used.
The stock of work in progress is controlled by the size of containers and
the number of kanbans.
Materials can only be moved in containers, and containers can only be
moved when they have a kanban attached. This gives a rigid means of
controlling the amount of materials produced and time they are moved.
While it is simple to manage, this system makes sure that stocks of
work in progress cannot accumulate.
CONWIP
CONWIP is a pull system that employs a single global set of cards to control total
WIP anywhere in the system.
Material enters a CONWIP system only when demand occurs, and the raw material
receives a card authorizing entrance; the same card authorizes the material to move
through the system and complete production.
When the final product leaves the system, the card is released, allowing new
material to enter the system as new demand occurs.
Notice that WIP is not controlled at the individual workstation level in the CONWIP
system. Total WIP in the system is a constant (thus the name CONWIP), for the
cards limit the total amount of work that can be anywhere in the system.
The Kanban system pulls work everywhere (between every pair of workstations),
while the CONWIP system only pulls work at the beginning of the line.
Advantages:
WIP is both clearly observable and under direct management control
CONWIP requires fewer cards than KANBAN, the cards relate to lines not parts.
CONWIP MECHANISM
B1 B2 B3
R.M.I F.G.I
M1 M2 M3 M4 Demand
Less paperwork
Improve quality of materials and products
Less scrap and wastage
Better morale and participation of the workforce
Better relations with suppliers
Emphasis on solving problems in the process.
Disadvantages of JIT
High risks of introducing completely new systems and operations
Initial investment and cost of implementation
Long time needed to get significant improvements
Reliance on perfect quality of materials from suppliers
Inability of suppliers to adapt to JIT methods
Need for stable production when demand is highly variable or
seasonal
Reduced flexibility to meet specific, or changing, customer demands
Difficulty of reducing set-up times and associated costs
Lack of commitment within the organization
Lack of co-operation and trust between employees
Problems linking JIT to other information systems, such as accounts
Need to change layout of facilities
Increased stress in workforce
Inability of some people to accept devolved responsibilities.