0% found this document useful (0 votes)
70 views152 pages

Using Geophysics To Characterize The Subsurface: The Principles

Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
70 views152 pages

Using Geophysics To Characterize The Subsurface: The Principles

Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 152

An Environmental Geophysics & Hydrology Tutorial

Using Geophysics to Characterize


the Subsurface: The Principles

(“Seeing through a
dark glass dimly.”)

© John F. Hermance
September 05, 2002
(Information for the Presenter)
Conventions for Prompting the Viewer
This is the “toggle” symbol to prompt presenter to
return to previous slide for quick comparisons with
the current slide.

The following “traffic light” signals appear in


lower right corner of the slide to prompt
presenter accordingly.
Move forward quickly, probably the next slide
has the essential information (e.g. labels).
Move forward after a slight pause to assess
whether content deserves brief comment.
This is a pausing point at which motivating
comments can be made, or the contents
thoroughly discussed.
An Environmental Geophysics & Hydrology Tutorial

Using Geophysics to Characterize


the Subsurface: The Principles

(“Seeing through a © John F. Hermance


dark glass dimly.”) September 05, 2002
An Environmental Geophysics & Hydrology Tutorial

Using Geophysics to Characterize


the Subsurface: The Principles

(“Seeing through a © John F. Hermance


dark glass dimly.”) September 05, 2002
An Environmental Geophysics & Hydrology Tutorial

(“Seeing through a © John F. Hermance


dark glass dimly.”) September 05, 2002
We determine subsurface conditions by remotely sensing physical
properties of materials in situ.
There are basically four modes (or “phases”) used in
seismic and radar investigations.
a) Vertical reflection
b) Wide angle reflection
c) Critical refraction
d) Direct wave
The seismic
method
records these
signals and
analyses their
relationship.
To do so, we need to
precisely determine
their arrival times, or
“traveltimes”.
To do so, we need to
precisely determine
their arrival times, or
“traveltimes”.
To do so, we need to
precisely determine
their arrival times, or
“traveltimes”.
These relative traveltimes are
the basis for interpreting
seismic data.
An example of 4 traces recorded at adjacent position offsets.

“Picking” traveltimes (or “first


breaks”) is sometimes a
subjective art form.
An example of 4 traces recorded at adjacent position offsets.

How do these look ?


An example of 4 traces recorded at adjacent position offsets.

The traveltime of a phase corresponds to the relative time


between its “first break” and the launch of the signal.
An Environmental Geophysics & Hydrology Tutorial

© John F. Hermance
September 05, 2002
An Environmental Geophysics & Hydrology Tutorial

© John F. Hermance
September 05, 2002
An Environmental Geophysics & Hydrology Tutorial

Seismic Sources !!

© John F. Hermance
September 05, 2002
An Environmental Geophysics & Hydrology Tutorial

© John F. Hermance
September 05, 2002
An Environmental Geophysics & Hydrology Tutorial

The transmitted chirp is cross-correlated


with the composite signal received at the
geophones to detect specific reflections,
refractions, etc.
Size varies:
• One person vibrators or compactors;
• Articulated earth movers.

From IMC web page.


© John F. Hermance
September 05, 2002
An Environmental Geophysics & Hydrology Tutorial
A geophysics class in the field (Anne Sheehan; U. Colorado)

© John F. Hermance
September 05, 2002
An Environmental Geophysics & Hydrology Tutorial

Vibroseis Trucks in the Field (Anne Sheehan; U. Colorado)

© John F. Hermance
September 05, 2002
An Environmental Geophysics & Hydrology Tutorial

Seismic Sources !!

Note the subtle difference


in scale.

© John F. Hermance
(The “Brown Way”.) September 05, 2002
An Environmental Geophysics & Hydrology Tutorial
Vibroseis platform jacked down (Anne Sheehan; U. Colorado)

© John F. Hermance
September 05, 2002
An Environmental Geophysics & Hydrology Tutorial

(U British Columbia:
(University of Bergen.) Lithoprobe Project.)

(Network for Earthquake Engineering © John F. Hermance


September 05, 2002
Simulation; U Texas.)
An Environmental Geophysics & Hydrology Tutorial
Vibrating type sources. (Photos from Terraplus.)

© John F. Hermance
September 05, 2002
An Environmental Geophysics & Hydrology Tutorial

© John F. Hermance
September 05, 2002
An Environmental Geophysics & Hydrology Tutorial

© John F. Hermance
September 05, 2002
An Environmental Geophysics & Hydrology Tutorial

© John F. Hermance
September 05, 2002
Implementing the Seismic Method.

Jeff Sullivan; ScM, Brown U.


(w/ Rabi Bohidar, PhD.)
Consider a two layered earth model.
Principal instruments.
Add an operator.
A “Shot”.
A sound pulse is generated.
And recorded.
And . . .
. . . a reflection is generated.
And recorded.
To summarize: An impulsive source (a sledge hammer blow to a steel
plate) generates a sound wave that travels through the subsurface. . . .
. . . If one knows the distance (x) between the “shot” and the sensor, and
the time (T) it takes the wave to travel this distance, . . .
. . . one can determine the velocity (V) of the material,

V=x/T

and tell, for example, . . .


. . . whether the medium is
bedrock,
dry soil, or
saturated soil,
among other possibilities.
In this way, we determine the material properties of the subsurface.
Alternatively, if one knows the velocity (V) of the material and the
time (T) it takes the wave to get to a sensor, then rearranging

V=x/T

...
. . . to the form

x=V/T,

one can determine the distance (x) from the shot to the sensor.
While not particularly useful for the case above, . . .
. . . the latter concept is critical for determining the
nature of structures at depth below the surface.
For example, when there are layers at depth.
Determining
Determining the
the depth
depth when
when V V and
and TT are
are known
known is
is the
the
principle
principle of
of the
the reflection
reflection method.
method.
Theory: Behavior of Waves in the Subsurface

In order to understand how to extract more detailed


subsurface information from geophysical measurements at the
surface, we first analyze the behavior of waves (seismic or
radar) in the subsurface.
An Environmental Geophysics & Hydrology Tutorial

© John F. Hermance
September 05, 2002
An Environmental Geophysics & Hydrology Tutorial

© John F. Hermance
September 05, 2002 This is the field situation to be considered.
Please review the animation sequence for
Reflected Phases at this time.

Please minimize this application, the animation


sequence is found on the index page.

Maximize this application when ready to continue.


Essential points for discussion.

1) The relative difference in arrival times of the ‘direct’ and


‘reflected’ phases as offset increases.
Essential points for discussion.

1) The relative difference in arrival times of the ‘direct’ and


‘reflected’ phases as offset increases.

2) The synchrony of the two phases along the lower


interface.
Essential points for discussion.

1) The relative difference in arrival times of the ‘direct’ and


‘reflected’ phases as offset increases.

2) The synchrony of the two phases along the lower


interface.

3) The difference in the ‘apparent’ velocity of the two


phases along the surface
a) The direct (primary) wave travels @ v1.
b) The reflected wave @ v1 / sin i
(where i is the incident angle).
Essential points for discussion.

1) The relative difference in arrival times of the ‘direct’ and


‘reflected’ phases as offset increases.

2) The synchrony of the two phases along the lower


interface.

3) The difference in the ‘apparent’ velocity of the two


phases along the surface
a) The direct (primary) wave travels @ v1.
b) The reflected wave @ v1 / sin i
(where i is the incident angle).
An Environmental Geophysics & Hydrology Tutorial

Traveltime Relations for Direct and


Reflected Phases

© John F. Hermance
September 05, 2002
An Environmental Geophysics & Hydrology Tutorial

© John F. Hermance
September 05, 2002 The field situation.
An Environmental Geophysics & Hydrology Tutorial

© John F. Hermance
September 05, 2002 The field situation showing cutaway.
An Environmental Geophysics & Hydrology Tutorial

© John F. Hermance
September 05, 2002 The field situation with geophone.
An Environmental Geophysics & Hydrology Tutorial

© John F. Hermance
September 05, 2002 Direct and reflected ray paths.
An Environmental Geophysics & Hydrology Tutorial

How can we use the ‘reflected’ phase to


determine the depth to the respective
horizon (or layer) ?

© John F. Hermance
September 05, 2002
An Environmental Geophysics & Hydrology Tutorial

© John F. Hermance
September 05, 2002 Geometry for a reflection.
An Environmental Geophysics & Hydrology Tutorial

© John F. Hermance
September 05, 2002 Traveltime for a reflection.
If we “know” x and v, we can determine d, the
depth to the reflector.
An Environmental Geophysics & Hydrology Tutorial

© John F. Hermance
September 05, 2002 Direct and reflected ray paths with traveltimes.
Please review tutorial on Analyzing Direct and
Reflected Phases at this time.

Please minimize this application, the tutorial is


found on the index page.

Maximize this application when ready to continue.


An Environmental Geophysics & Hydrology Tutorial

© John F. Hermance
September 05, 2002
An Environmental Geophysics & Hydrology Tutorial

© John F. Hermance
September 05, 2002
An Environmental Geophysics & Hydrology Tutorial

© John F. Hermance
September 05, 2002
An Environmental Geophysics & Hydrology Tutorial

Next, consider the ‘refracted’ phase.

© John F. Hermance
September 05, 2002
An Environmental Geophysics & Hydrology Tutorial

© John F. Hermance
September 05, 2002 Snell’s Law for Reflection and Refraction.
Refraction at the Critical Angle.
Please review the animation sequence for
Refracted Phases at this time.

Please minimize this application, the animation


sequence is found on the index page.

Maximize this application when ready to continue.


Essential points for discussion.

1) The relative difference in arrival times of the ‘direct’,


‘reflected’ & ‘refracted’ phases as offset increases.
Essential points for discussion.

1) The relative difference in arrival times of the ‘direct’,


‘reflected’ & ‘refracted’ phases as offset increases.

2) The synchrony of the direct and reflected phases along


the lower interface.
Essential points for discussion.

1) The relative difference in arrival times of the ‘direct’,


‘reflected’ & ‘refracted’ phases as offset increases.

2) The synchrony of the direct and reflected phases along


the lower interface.

3) The refracted wavefront is tangential to the reflected


wavefront at the critical angle.
Essential points for discussion.

1) The relative difference in arrival times of the ‘direct’,


‘reflected’ & ‘refracted’ phases as offset increases.

2) The synchrony of the direct and reflected phases along


the lower interface.

3) The refracted wavefront is tangential to the reflected


wavefront at the critical angle.

4) The difference in the ‘apparent’ velocity of the


three
phases along the surface
a) The direct (primary) wave travels @ v1.
b) The reflected wave @ v1 / sin i
(where i is the incident angle).
c) The refracted wave @ v = v / sin 
Essential points for discussion.

1) The relative difference in arrival times of the ‘direct’,


‘reflected’ & ‘refracted’ phases as offset increases.

2) The synchrony of the direct and reflected phases along


the lower interface.

3) The refracted wavefront is tangential to the reflected


wavefront at the critical angle.

4) The difference in the ‘apparent’ velocity of the


three
phases along the surface
a) The direct (primary) wave travels @ v1.
b) The reflected wave @ v1 / sin i
(where i is the incident angle).
c) The refracted wave @ v = v / sin 
Refraction at the Critical Angle.
In summary: A seismic (or radar) signal generates a number
of modes.
An Environmental Geophysics & Hydrology Tutorial

How can we use the ‘refracted’ phase


to determine structure in the earth ?

© John F. Hermance
September 05, 2002
An Environmental Geophysics & Hydrology Tutorial

© John F. Hermance
September 05, 2002 Recall the direct and reflected ray paths.
An Environmental Geophysics & Hydrology Tutorial

© John F. Hermance
September 05, 2002 The direct and refracted ray paths.
An Environmental Geophysics & Hydrology Tutorial

© John F. Hermance
September 05, 2002
Composite of direct, reflected and refracted
ray paths.
An Environmental Geophysics & Hydrology Tutorial

Set of synthetic
seismograms.

© John F. Hermance
September 05, 2002
An Environmental Geophysics & Hydrology Tutorial

Details on “Picking” and Interpreting


Seismic Data

© John F. Hermance
September 05, 2002
An Environmental Geophysics & Hydrology Tutorial

© John F. Hermance
September 05, 2002
An Environmental Geophysics & Hydrology Tutorial

Set of synthetic
seismograms.
(Direct phase.)

© John F. Hermance
September 05, 2002
An Environmental Geophysics & Hydrology Tutorial

(Direct wave
“picks” are best in
here.)

© John F. Hermance
September 05, 2002
An Environmental Geophysics & Hydrology Tutorial

Analysis of direct
ground wave.

© John F. Hermance
September 05, 2002
An Environmental Geophysics & Hydrology Tutorial

Direct ground
wave traveltime
should (?) go
through origin.

© John F. Hermance
September 05, 2002
An Environmental Geophysics & Hydrology Tutorial

© John F. Hermance
September 05, 2002
An Environmental Geophysics & Hydrology Tutorial

Set of synthetic
seismograms.
(Reflected phase.)

© John F. Hermance
September 05, 2002
An Environmental Geophysics & Hydrology Tutorial

Analyzing reflected phases: An alternative


expression for the traveltime.

© John F. Hermance
September 05, 2002
An Environmental Geophysics & Hydrology Tutorial

Analyzing reflected phases: An alternative


expression for the traveltime.

© John F. Hermance
September 05, 2002
An Environmental Geophysics & Hydrology Tutorial

Analyzing reflected phases: An alternative


expression for the traveltime.

The slope m, and the intercept b, provide the


essential parameters for interpretation.
© John F. Hermance
September 05, 2002
An Environmental Geophysics & Hydrology Tutorial

Analysis of
reflected phase
using T2 - X2
method.

© John F. Hermance
September 05, 2002
An Environmental Geophysics & Hydrology Tutorial

© John F. Hermance
September 05, 2002
An Environmental Geophysics & Hydrology Tutorial

Set of synthetic
seismograms.
(Refracted phase.)

© John F. Hermance
September 05, 2002
An Environmental Geophysics & Hydrology Tutorial

Analysis of critically
refracted phase.

© John F. Hermance
September 05, 2002
An Environmental Geophysics & Hydrology Tutorial

Traveltime relations.
© John F. Hermance
September 05, 2002
Actual
seismogram
showing various
phases.
© John F. Hermance
September 05, 2002
Picking
“first breaks”
(Continue).
© John F. Hermance
September 05, 2002
To get truly good “first break” picks, you need to
a) Turn up the gain;
b) Adjust “events” to common amplitude.
(This is because low amplitude picks tend to
be biased to later times.)

Picking
“first breaks”
(Continue).
© John F. Hermance
September 05, 2002
An Environmental Geophysics & Hydrology Tutorial

Using the refraction method for more


complicated field situations.

© John F. Hermance
September 05, 2002
An Environmental Geophysics & Hydrology Tutorial

Consider “dipping” interfaces.

© John F. Hermance
September 05, 2002
An Environmental Geophysics & Hydrology Tutorial

Consider “dipping” interfaces.


We employ “reversed” refraction profiling.

© John F. Hermance
September 05, 2002
Procedure: Step 1; The “Forward” Shot.
Procedure: Step 2; The “Reverse” Shot.
An Environmental Geophysics & Hydrology Tutorial

We use the theoretical traveltime of the respective


refracted phases.

© John F. Hermance
September 1, 2002
The Theoretical Traveltime for a Refracted Phase
on a Dipping Interface.
An Environmental Geophysics & Hydrology Tutorial

© John F. Hermance
September 05, 2002
An Environmental Geophysics & Hydrology Tutorial

© John F. Hermance
September 05, 2002
An Environmental Geophysics & Hydrology Tutorial

© John F. Hermance
September 05, 2002
An Environmental Geophysics & Hydrology Tutorial

© John F. Hermance
September 05, 2002
Summary of apparent velocities and intercept
times for a dipping interface.
An Environmental Geophysics & Hydrology Tutorial

How do we gather and interpret field data ?

© John F. Hermance
September 05, 2002
Procedure: Step 1; The “Forward” Shot.
Step 1: Shoot in Forward Direction.
Procedure: Step 2; The “Reverse” Shot.
Step 2: Shoot in Reverse Direction.
Step 3: Inspect Data.
Step 4: Determine Forward Velocity.
Step 5: Determine Reverse Velocity.
Step 6: Determine Forward Intercept.
Step 7: Determine Reverse Intercept.
Step 7: Determine Reverse Intercept.

ItIt is
is critical
critical to
to remember
remember that
that the
the
“reciprocal
“reciprocal traveltimes”
traveltimes” are
are identical.
identical.
An Environmental Geophysics & Hydrology Tutorial

© John F. Hermance
September 05, 2002 Traveltime relations: Dipping refractor.
An Environmental Geophysics & Hydrology Tutorial

Some Examples.

© John F. Hermance
September 05, 2002
An actual interpretation of
dipping plane interfaces
(J. Sullivan; Seekonk, MA).
Characteristics of Field Area 1: Vertical GPR Time Section

Ground Penetrating Radar Image from Field Site


Freq:100 MHz
Tx-Rx Offset: 2 m
An Environmental Geophysics & Hydrology Tutorial

Example of a refined interpretation using a


combination of seismic refraction methods
© John F. Hermance
September 05, 2002
and ground penetrating radar.
Subsurface structure above bedrock at field site.

[Seismic interpretation from Jeff


Composite interpretation using seismic refraction,
Sullivan (personal communication.).]
DC resistivity, EM, GPR and gravity.
An Environmental Geophysics & Hydrology Tutorial

© John F. Hermance Example of refraction study: Palmer River Basin.


September 05, 2002
In summary, a seismic interpretation depends on properly
identifying and time-picking appropriate phases.
Field Procedure for Seismic Refraction Surveys
(A checklist for a "typical" seismic refraction sounding.)

• Begin by deploying a 12 channel recording system w/ 40 Hz


geophones at predetermined (1 m?) spacing.

© John F. Hermance
September 05, 2002
Field Procedure for Seismic Refraction Surveys
(A checklist for a "typical" seismic refraction sounding.)

• Begin by deploying a 12 channel recording system w/ 40 Hz


geophones at predetermined (1 m?) spacing.
• Perform a walkaway calibration experiment w/ shot points (hammer
blows) at offset distances of 1, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25 & 30 meters from the
first geophone. This procedure provides 100% redundancy for any set
of shot point-geophone offsets.

© John F. Hermance
September 05, 2002
Field Procedure for Seismic Refraction Surveys
(A checklist for a "typical" seismic refraction sounding.)

• Begin by deploying a 12 channel recording system w/ 40 Hz


geophones at predetermined (1 m?) spacing.
• Perform a walkaway calibration experiment w/ shot points (hammer
blows) at offset distances of 1, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25 & 30 meters from the
first geophone. This procedure provides 100% redundancy for any set
of shot point-geophone offsets.
• Identify direct wave and refracted wave "first breaks".

© John F. Hermance
September 05, 2002
Field Procedure for Seismic Refraction Surveys
(A checklist for a "typical" seismic refraction sounding.)

• Begin by deploying a 12 channel recording system w/ 40 Hz


geophones at predetermined (1 m?) spacing.
• Perform a walkaway calibration experiment w/ shot points (hammer
blows) at offset distances of 1, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25 & 30 meters from the
first geophone. This procedure provides 100% redundancy for any set
of shot point-geophone offsets.
• Identify direct wave and refracted wave "first breaks".
• Reverse profile to identify dip on refractor.

© John F. Hermance
September 05, 2002
Field Procedure for Seismic Refraction Surveys
(A checklist for a "typical" seismic refraction sounding.)

• Begin by deploying a 12 channel recording system w/ 40 Hz


geophones at predetermined (1 m?) spacing.
• Perform a walkaway calibration experiment w/ shot points (hammer
blows) at offset distances of 1, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25 & 30 meters from the
first geophone. This procedure provides 100% redundancy for any set
of shot point-geophone offsets.
• Identify direct wave and refracted wave "first breaks".
• Reverse profile to identify dip on refractor.
• Based on these “calibration” runs, design an optimal field plan.

© John F. Hermance
September 05, 2002
Field Procedure for Seismic Refraction Surveys
(A checklist for a "typical" seismic refraction sounding.)

• Begin by deploying a 12 channel recording system w/ 40 Hz


geophones at predetermined (1 m?) spacing.
• Perform a walkaway calibration experiment w/ shot points (hammer
blows) at offset distances of 1, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25 & 30 meters from the
first geophone. This procedure provides 100% redundancy for any set
of shot point-geophone offsets.
• Identify direct wave and refracted wave "first breaks".
• Reverse profile to identify dip on refractor.
• Based on these “calibration” runs, design an optimal field plan.
• Execute the optimized survey plan assuring adequate reciprocal shot
point-geophone data for both conventional reversed profiling as well as
a delay time analysis.

© John F. Hermance
September 05, 2002
Field Procedure for Seismic Refraction Surveys
(A checklist for a "typical" seismic refraction sounding.)

• Begin by deploying a 12 channel recording system w/ 40 Hz


geophones at predetermined (1 m?) spacing.
• Perform a walkaway calibration experiment w/ shot points (hammer
blows) at offset distances of 1, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25 & 30 meters from the
first geophone. This procedure provides 100% redundancy for any set
of shot point-geophone offsets.
• Identify direct wave and refracted wave "first breaks".
• Reverse profile to identify dip on refractor.
• Based on these “calibration” runs, design an optimal field plan.
• Execute the optimized survey plan assuring adequate reciprocal shot
point-geophone data for both conventional reversed profiling as well as
a delay time analysis.
• Separate shot point time-terms from receiver time-terms.

© John F. Hermance
September 05, 2002
Field Procedure for Seismic Refraction Surveys
(A checklist for a "typical" seismic refraction sounding.)

• Begin by deploying a 12 channel recording system w/ 40 Hz


geophones at predetermined (1 m?) spacing.
• Perform a walkaway calibration experiment w/ shot points (hammer
blows) at offset distances of 1, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25 & 30 meters from the
first geophone. This procedure provides 100% redundancy for any set
of shot point-geophone offsets.
• Identify direct wave and refracted wave "first breaks".
• Reverse profile to identify dip on refractor.
• Based on these “calibration” runs, design an optimal field plan.
• Execute the optimized survey plan assuring adequate reciprocal shot
point-geophone data for both conventional reversed profiling as well as
a delay time analysis.
• Separate shot point time-terms from receiver time-terms.
• Shoot in orthogonal direction to determine dip and strike of refractor
in three dimensions.

© John F. Hermance
September 05, 2002
Field Procedure for Seismic Refraction Surveys
(A checklist for a "typical" seismic refraction sounding.)

• Begin by deploying a 12 channel recording system w/ 40 Hz


geophones at predetermined (1 m?) spacing.
• Perform a walkaway calibration experiment w/ shot points (hammer
blows) at offset distances of 1, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25 & 30 meters from the
first geophone. This procedure provides 100% redundancy for any set
of shot point-geophone offsets.
• Identify direct wave and refracted wave "first breaks".
• Reverse profile to identify dip on refractor.
• Based on these “calibration” runs, design an optimal field plan.
• Execute the optimized survey plan assuring adequate reciprocal shot
point-geophone data for both conventional reversed profiling as well as
a delay time analysis.
• Separate shot point time-terms from receiver time-terms.
• Shoot in orthogonal direction to determine dip and strike of refractor
in three dimensions.

© John F. Hermance
September 05, 2002
Field Procedure for Seismic Refraction Surveys
(A checklist for a "typical" seismic refraction sounding.)

• Begin by deploying a 12 channel recording system w/ 40 Hz


geophones at predetermined (1 m?) spacing.
• Perform a walkaway calibration experiment w/ shot points (hammer
blows) at offset distances of 1, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25 & 30 meters from the
first geophone. This procedure provides 100% redundancy for any set
of shot point-geophone offsets.
• Identify direct wave and refracted wave "first breaks".
• Reverse profile to identify dip on refractor.
• Based on these “calibration” runs, design an optimal field plan.
• Execute the optimized survey plan assuring adequate reciprocal shot
point-geophone data for both conventional reversed profiling as well as
a delay time analysis.
• Separate shot point time-terms from receiver time-terms.
• Shoot in orthogonal direction to determine dip and strike of refractor
in three dimensions.

© John F. Hermance
September 05, 2002
Each of these wave modes (or ‘phases’) provide useful, oftentimes
essential, information on the subsurface

In addition, strong analogies exist between


• Seismic (acoustic or mechanical) phenomena and
• Ground penetrating radar (electromagnetic) signals.

End of Presentation

© John F. Hermance
September 05, 2002

You might also like