Project O: Breast Cancer Gene Analysis Using R: Sheena Scroggins, Susan Mcgowan, John Caras
Project O: Breast Cancer Gene Analysis Using R: Sheena Scroggins, Susan Mcgowan, John Caras
Analysis Using R
RESULTS:
DE – this refers to the number of significant genes in Meta-
Analysis. Our chosen group of genes shows none.
IDD – genes which are significant in Meta-Analysis but not in
individual studies. None is expected since no DEG genes were
found.
Loss – genes significant in individual data sets but not in Meta-
Analysis.
IDR & IRR are the percentages of Integration Driven Dis-
coveries and Integration Driven Revisions in identified differentially
expressed genes.
DEG analysis – Summary of the
combination of P - values
summary(pvalt)
Length Class Mode
study1 76 -none- numeric
study2 0 -none- numeric
study3 16 -none- numeric
AllIndStudies92 -none- numeric
Meta 0 -none- numeric
TestStatistic 5228-none- numeric
• study1, study2 & study3 – indices of differentially
expressed genes in data sets 1 through 3.
• AllIndStudies - an index of DEG in at least one data set.
• Meta – an index of DEG found by meta-analysis.
• TestStatistic- an index of test statistics in meta-analysis.
Conclusion
• All three data sets used the HGU133a array. All three data
sets came from breast cancer tissue or individuals who had
breast cancer, with the exception of the second set which
compared normal epithelial cells in breast cancer vs.
normal epithelial cells in non-breast cancer samples.
• Analyzing microarray data by meta-analysis can be
problematic. In some cases, such as this study, it can lead
to null results.
• Whether analyzing our data sets individually or by Meta-
Analysis we can come to the conclusion that the second
data set, which happened to be the largest data set did not
have highly expressed or differentially expressed genes.
References
• Clark, A.G., Glanowski S, Nielsen R, Thomas PD, Kejariwal A, Todd
MA, Tanenbaum DM, Civello D, Lu F, Murphy B, Ferriera S, Wang G,
Zheng X, White TJ, Sninsky JJ, Adams MD, Cargill M., (2003).
Inferring nonneutral evolution from human-chimp-mouse orthologous
gene trios. Journal of Science, 2003 December 12;302(5652):1960-3.
• Hahne, F.,Huber,W.,Gentleman, R., and Falcon,S.,. Bioconductor
Case Studies. New York, NY. Springer Science and Business Media,
LLC. 2008.
• Ihnatova, I., MAMA: a 9 in 1 R package for Meta-Analysis of
MicroArray, October 1, 2010.
• http://cran.r-project.org/
• http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BRCA1
• http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BRCA2
• http://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/factsheet/Risk/BRCA
• http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/
• http://www.nextbio.com/b/nextbio.nb