Strategic Control and Corporate Governance: Because Learning Changes Everything
Strategic Control and Corporate Governance: Because Learning Changes Everything
Strategic Control and Corporate Governance: Because Learning Changes Everything
everything. ®
CHAPTER 9
Strategic Control and
Corporate Governance
© 2021 McGraw Hill. All rights reserved. Authorized only for instructor use in the classroom.
No reproduction or further distribution permitted without the prior written consent of McGraw Hill.
Learning Objectives
After reading this chapter, you should be able to:
1. Understand the value of effective strategic control systems in strategy
implementation.
2. Identify the key difference between “traditional” and “contemporary”
control systems.
3. Explain the imperative for contemporary control systems in today’s
complex and rapidly changing competitive and general environments.
4. Identify the benefits of having the proper balance among the three
levers of behavioral control: culture, rewards and incentives, and
boundaries.
5. Identify the three key participants in corporate governance:
shareholders, management (led by the CEO), and the board of
directors.
6. Explain the role of corporate governance mechanisms in ensuring that
the interests of managers are aligned with those of shareholders from
both the United States and international perspectives.
© McGraw Hill
Looking Ahead
© McGraw Hill
Strategic Control
Consider …
Once strategy is formulated, it must be
implemented, and part of implementation is
establishing a mechanism for monitoring and
correcting organizational performance.
This control mechanism must be consistent
with the strategy the firm is following.
How does a firm make sure all key
stakeholders are moving in the right
direction?
© McGraw Hill
Strategic Control Mechanisms
Strategic control involves monitoring
performance toward strategic goals and taking
corrective action when needed via effective
systems.
• Informational-control systems.
• Behavioral-control systems.
• Corporate governance.
© McGraw Hill
Strategic Control: Traditional Approach
Model
The traditional approach to strategic control is
sequential.
1.Strategies are formulated, goals are set.
2.Strategies are implemented.
3.Performance is measured against predetermined goals.
© McGraw Hill
Strategic Control: Traditional Approach
© McGraw Hill
Strategic Control: Contemporary
Approach Model
Relationships between strategy formulation,
implementation, and control are highly interactive, utilizing:
• Informational control.
• Behavioral control.
© McGraw Hill
Strategic Control: Contemporary
Approach Effectiveness
Contemporary control systems using
informational control are effective when:
• Focus is on constantly changing information that
has potential strategic importance.
• Information is important enough to demand
frequent and regular attention from all levels.
• Data and information are interpreted and
discussed in face-to-face meetings.
• Control system is a catalyst for ongoing debate
about underlying data, assumptions and plans.
© McGraw Hill
Question 1
© McGraw Hill
Informational Control: Issues
© McGraw Hill
Informational Control: Characteristics
© McGraw Hill
Question 2
© McGraw Hill
Behavioral Control Model
Behavioral control = focused on
implementation — “doing things right.”
Influences the actions of employees via:
• Culture.
• Rewards.
• Boundaries.
Exhibit 9.3
Essential
Elements of
Behavioral
Control
© McGraw Hill
Behavioral Control: Culture
© McGraw Hill
Behavioral Control: Role of Culture
A strong culture:
• Leads to greater employee engagement.
• Provides a common purpose and identity.
• But can also introduce core rigidities.
© McGraw Hill
Behavioral Control: Sustaining an
Effective Culture
© McGraw Hill
Behavioral Control: Rewards
© McGraw Hill
Behavioral Control: Downside of Reward
Systems
Potential downsides to reward systems:
• Individual actions are not related to compensation;
employees are rewarded for the wrong things.
• Different business units have differing rewards
systems.
• Behavior reinforced within subcultures may reflect
value differences in opposition to the dominant
culture.
• Reward systems may lead to information hoarding,
working at cross purposes.
© McGraw Hill
Behavioral Control: Reward Systems
Characteristics
Effective reward systems share common
characteristics.
• Objectives are clear, well understood, and broadly
accepted.
• Rewards are clearly linked to performance and desired
behaviors.
• Performance measures are clear and highly visible.
• Feedback is prompt, clear, and unambiguous.
• The compensation “system” is perceived as fair and
equitable.
• The structure is flexible; it can adapt to changing
circumstances.
© McGraw Hill
Behavioral Control: Boundaries 1
© McGraw Hill
Question 3
Rules and regulations, rather than culture or
rewards, would probably be used for strategic
control at what type of company?
A. Software developer.
B. Stock brokerage firm.
C. Manufacturer of mass-produced products.
D. High-tech research facility.
© McGraw Hill
Behavioral Control: Boundaries 2
© McGraw Hill
Behavioral Control Systems: Situational
Factors
Approach Some Situational Factors
Culture: A system of unwritten rules • Often found in professional
that forms an internalized influence organizations.
over behavior. • Associated with high autonomy.
• Norms are the basis for behavior.
Rules: Written and explicit guidelines • Associated with standardized output.
that provide external constraints on • Most appropriate when tasks are
behavior. generally repetitive and routine.
• Little need for innovation or creative
activity.
Rewards: The use of performance- • Measurement of output and
base incentive systems to motivate. performance is rather
straightforward.
• Most appropriate in organizations
pursuing unrelated diversification.
• Rewards may be used to reinforce
other means of control.
© McGraw Hill 27
Corporate Governance Mechanisms
© McGraw Hill 28
Corporate Governance Mechanisms:
Board of Directors Effectiveness
An effective Board of Directors should:
• Become active, critical participants.
• Discuss forward-looking strategic issues.
• Evaluate CEOs against high performance standards.
• Practice director independence.
• Benefits of outsider dominance include broader access to
knowledge, independent oversight of strategy.
• Disadvantages include less direct operational information,
less opportunity to build relationships with non-board
member executives who then lack access to this strategic
insight.
© McGraw Hill 29
Corporate Governance Mechanisms:
Shareholder Activism
Shareholder activism assumes the following:
Individual shareholders have rights.
• To sell stock, vote the proxy, bring suit for damages, get
information, receive residual rights following the company’s
liquidation.
Collectively, shareholders have power.
• To direct the course of corporations, file shareholder action
suits, demand key issues be brought up for proxy votes.
Institutional investors can be aggressive.
• By pressuring the firm to change leadership or undertake
strategic actions such as stock buy-back or selloff.
© McGraw Hill 30
Corporate Governance Mechanisms:
Managerial Rewards and Incentives
Boards are responsible for managerial rewards
and incentives.
• Boards can require that CEOs become substantial
owners of company stock.
• Salaries, bonuses, and stock options can be
structured so as to provide rewards for superior
performance and penalties for poor performance.
• Dismissal for poor performance should be a
realistic threat.
© McGraw Hill 31
Corporate Governance Mechanisms: CEO
Duality?
Unity of command: (in favor of) duality:
• Provides clear focus.
• Eliminates confusion and conflict.
• Enhances a firm’s responsiveness.
• Enables quick decisions based on first-hand
knowledge
Agency theory: (in favor of) separation.
• Safeguards against corruption or incompetence.
• Removes conflict of interest, especially regarding
CEO succession.
© McGraw Hill 32
External Corporate Governance
Mechanisms
EXTERNAL governance control mechanisms:
• The market for corporate control — if shareholders
sell, stock value declines, increases possibility of
takeover.
• Takeover constraint – fear of acquisition by hostile raider.
• Auditors who verify the firm’s books.
• Banks and analysts who conduct in-depth studies of
firms.
• Governmental regulatory bodies that require disclosure
of financial information.
• Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).
• Media and public activists who influence public
perception.
© McGraw Hill 33
International Corporate Governance
In countries other than the United States and the
UK, there is another perspective. Principal –
principal conflicts (as opposed to principal –
agent conflicts) involve:
• Concentrated ownership, or family ownership.
• Motivation to engage in expropriation of minority
shareholders for personal gain.
• Business groups who can take coordinated
action.
• Japanese keiretsus, Korean chaebols.
© McGraw Hill 34
End of Main Content
www.mheducation.com
© 2021 McGraw Hill. All rights reserved. Authorized only for instructor use in the classroom.
No reproduction or further distribution permitted without the prior written consent of McGraw Hill.