Financial Strategy: Session 3 - Portfolio Management
Financial Strategy: Session 3 - Portfolio Management
Financial Strategy
Individual and
Personal Trusts Life Cycle Life Cycle
Mutual Funds Variable Variable
Pension Funds Assumed actuarial rate Depends on payouts
Endowment Funds Determined by income needs and Generally conservative
asset growth to maintain real value
Matrix of Objectives (cont’d)
Phases
14
The private banker job: know your customer as investor
Total assets Personal / family: the more capital available, the higher is in general the degree of acceptable risk,
because on large property the principle of diversification can be implemented more effectively, nd
therefore under equal conditions you can choose a more aggressive investment
Saving propension Intended as a percentage of income or rather as monthly flows of income and outcome: the higher
the percentage of your income you can set aside, the more you can move towards greater
investment in equity , because of the lower need of constant new liquidity
Risk propension If the investor who sees a decrease of the value of his investment can not resist the temptation to
sell, it will not be suitable for a risky instrument. Risk appetite can also be deduced from a
consideration of their own personal history, through the question: "how many shares the investor
has held on average over the last 3 years? Would you replicate your choice or have you run a risk
too much high?"
Financial knowledge of the fundamental relationships between the variables that determine the
background performance of financial markets: basically, the more the investor is an expert on the markets, the
more suitable he is for risky investments
15
The private banker job: identify the target
1. Liquidity needs
16
Market analysis
Definition of financial position investor
asset allocation
Portfolio rebalancing
Management methodologies
Methodologies Description
18
Tactical asset allocation
19
Management Techniques (1/3)
Tecniques Description
BUY & HOLD It consists in buying and holding to maturity of the investment mix of activities initially
considered optimal
CONSTANT MIX It maintains the relative proportion of the assets in the portfolio , despite the changes in
the prices which would tend to edit it. Requires constant rebalancing of assets
CORE-SWING It divides the capital available for investment in two different portfolios . On the first
(core ) it is entrusted essentially a function of risk control of the investment as a whole
with oriented returns on long- term optical ; for this is organized privileging the aspect of
diversification and managed using the technique of constant mix . The second ( swing ) is
instead oriented to the pursuit of profit objectives through the management of dynamic
linked to a short-term , while fewer restrictions are imposed on the appearance of risk .
ALFA SERCH The manager decides to accept immediately and completely control the allocation by
changing the weight percentage of the various asset classes in the portfolio according to
the forecast of appreciation or depreciation of the related
20
Management Techniques (2/3)
Buy & Hold Very low • Management simplicity • Risk of reduction of the
• Low transaction costs level of diversification
• Since it is not a real
• Maximizing the return of
business of
portfolio assets with
management, any "
constant trend
management fees " are
hardly sustainable from
a commercial
• Correspondence
Constant mix Low continues with respect to
• High transaction costs
the optimal composition • No maximizing the
of LT defined From the performance of the
year . strategic portfolio if the various
• Maximization of the asset classes have
constant performance
assets included in the
trends
portfolio with high levels
of volatility
21
Management Techniques (3/3)
CORE- Quite high • Better economic results • The technique efficacy depends
SWING if you implement a on the degrees of freedom that
strategy of effective and the consultant maintains with
appropriate market reference to the swing portfolio
timing • Increase of the uncertainty of
the performance, with the
possibility of tracking errors
both positive or negative
22
Ibbotson (1997) says that long-term factors which determine
PORTFOLIO PERFORMANCE are as follows
23
Contribution % to portfolio performance
100
80
Timing
60 Asset Allocation
40 Stock Selection
20
0
0 6 mesi 1 anno 5 anni 10 anni
24
Factors influencing portfolio behavior
Another study by Brinson, Singer, Beebouwer (1986), concludes that the factors that better
explain portfolio variability during time are :
25
More nobel prize winners reach similar conclusions...
Harry Markovitz - says about 95% of investment returns depend on how assets are split between stocks,
bonds, cash, real estate .
Sharpe - says that the split bewteen stocks, bonds and cash accounts for 90% of investment returns. The
remaining 10% depends on which specific issue you choose (single stocks, funds, etc.) and on when you
decide to buy/sell
26
THERE IS NO PERFECT TIME TO BUY OR
SELL
$100.69
$105
$90
12.22%
$75 Average Return
$60
$26.44
$45
$30
8.76%
$15
Average Return
$0 Monthly Stock
Bad Market Timing Buy and Hold Returns from
(Miss 12 Best Months) (Fully Invested 1960 through
At All Times) 1999
27
TIME IS THE BEST ALLY OF AN INVESTOR
12000
18000
11500 S&P 500 Index During S&P 500 Index from
Sept & Oct of 1987 16000 3/30/1971 - 3/30/2001
11000
14000
10500
12000
10000
10000
9500
8000
9000
6000
8500
4000
8000
7500
2000
7000 0
30/04/198
08/05/198
18/05/198
27/05/198
04/06/198
12/06/198
22/06/198
30/06/198
09/07/198
17/07/198
27/07/198
04/08/198
12/08/198
20/08/198
28/08/198
08/09/198
16/09/198
24/09/198
02/10/198
12/10/198
20/10/198
28/10/198
05/11/198
13/11/198
23/11/198
02/12/198
10/12/198
18/12/198
29/12/198
07/01/198
15/01/198
25/01/198
02/02/198
10/02/198
19/02/198
29/02/198
08/03/198
16/03/198
24/03/198
04/04/198
12/04/198
20/04/198
28/04/198 27/02/1970
30/04/1971
30/06/1972
31/08/1973
31/10/1974
31/12/1975
28/02/1977
28/04/1978
29/06/1979
29/08/1980
30/10/1981
31/12/1982
29/02/1984
30/04/1985
30/06/1986
31/08/1987
31/10/1988
29/12/1989
28/02/1991
30/04/1992
30/06/1993
31/08/1994
31/10/1995
31/12/1996
27/02/1998
30/04/1999
30/06/2000
7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8
28
What is really important in portfolio selection?
Optimization
Strategic Asset 15% - 20%
Allocation
20% Strategic Asset Allocation
30% - 35%
Investiment process
20% Investment process
40%
29
Market timing? No thanks !!
Examples
• An investiment of 1.000 dollars in Standard & Poor's index on 31 december 1978, would have
reterurned 26.000 dollars on 31 december 1998, but , excluding the best 15 months the final value
would reduce to 7.000 dollars.
• Of 41 months which is the average duration of a bull phase, only 8 months have produced more
than 60% of total return .
• To have lost the best 10 months in terms of return of S&P 500 in the period 1960-1998 means to
obtain a monthly average return simlar to a short term bond investment.
• The trader or investor that wants to be sucessful with market timing must ne right on 3 times out of
4 just to be in line with competitors who do not trade (SHARPE).
30
Conclusion
How you choose your allocation between different main asset classes is the key decision in order for your
portfolio to accomplish your financial goals according to your time horizon
Unfortunately this key decision is mostly disregarded in favour of more short term considerations
31
Asset Allocation Combining Them Into An Efficient Portfolio Requires
Is A Key Element Of An Significant Expertise
Investment Strategy Risk / Return Tradeoff: HFR Fund of Funds with Global Stocks and Bonds
January 1990 – December 1999
Asset allocation explains 93.6% of
portfolio performance 13
100% HFR FOF
Sharpe Ratio = 1.26
Stock index: MSCI World (TR) (USD)
Bond Index: Salomon WGB (USD)
HFR Fund of Funds Index: Actual returns (USD)
Annualized Return
15% Stocks Sharpe Ratio = 1.04
Asset Allocation 10% Bonds 10% HFR FOF
Individual Stock Sharpe Ratio = 1.24 54% Stocks
Bond Selection 36% Bonds
60% Stocks
Market Timing 11
Sharpe Ratio = 0.65
40% Bonds
Undertermined Sharpe Ratio = 0.57
25% HFR FOF
45% Stocks
30% Bonds
Sharpe Ratio = 0.78
Source: Financial Analysts Journal, July - August 1986 10
5 6 7 8 9 10
Risk (+/-)
Very High
Bonds: nd y /
Fu teg s
- Value - Short-Term Bonds e a d
dg Str un Venture
He lti- e F Capital
- Growth - Investment grade u yl
M St
- Large Company e tes
Currencies
Bonds ur
ct No Equities
- Small Company tru e ns
Return
- Emerging Markets it S com Loa Convertible Bonds
d n
- International - Mortgage-Backed e I d
Cr r & age High Yield Bonds
i o an
- Emerging Bonds n
Se M High Yield Loans
n
Markets - International Bonds e ctio Corporate Bonds
t
ro Government Bonds
- High Yield al
P
Very Low
cip Short-Term Bonds
Alternative Investments: Pr
in
Fiduciary Deposits
- Hedge Funds Cash
- Private Equity Risk
Very Low (Standard Deviation) Very High 32
* Investment Diversification/Consulting Group
VALUATION PROCESS
33
VALUATION PROCESS
• Three-step approach is consisted of:
• top-down valuation process in which you first examine the influence of the
general economy on all firms and the security markets,
• then analyze the prospects for various global industries with the best
outlooks in this economic environment, and
• finally turn to the analysis of individual firms in the preferred industries and
to the common stock of these firms.
34
OVERVIEW OF THE INVESTMENT PROCESS
35
COMPANY ANALYSIS AND STOCK VALUATION
36
Managing Fixed Income Securities: Basic
Strategies
• Active strategy
• Trade on interest rate predictions
• Trade on market inefficiencies
• Passive strategy
• Control risk
• Balance risk and return
Bond Pricing Relationships
• Inverse relationship between price and yield
• An increase in a bond’s yield to maturity results in a smaller price
decline than the gain associated with a decrease in yield
• Long-term bonds tend to be more price sensitive than short-term
bonds
Bond Pricing Relationships (cont’d)
• As maturity increases, price sensitivity increases at a decreasing rate
• Price sensitivity is inversely related to a bond’s coupon rate
• Price sensitivity is inversely related to the yield to maturity at which
the bond is selling
Passive Management
• Bond-Index Funds
• Immunization of interest rate risk
• Net worth immunization
Duration of assets = Duration of liabilities
• Target date immunization
Holding Period matches Duration
• Cash flow matching and dedication
Duration and Convexity
Price
Duration
Yield
Correction for Convexity
1 n
CFt
Convexity
P (1 y ) 2 (1 y ) t (t t )
t 1
2
Correction for Convexity:
P 1
D y [Conveixity (y ) ]
2
P 2
Active Bond Management:
Swapping Strategies
• Substitution swap
• Intermarket swap
• Rate anticipation swap
• Pure yield pickup
• Tax swap
Yield Curve Ride
Yield to
Maturity %
1.5
1.25
.75
Maturity
3 mon 6 mon 9 mon
Lure of Active Management
Are markets totally efficient?
• Some managers outperform the market for extended periods
• While the abnormal performance may not be too large, it is too large to be
attributed solely to noise
• Evidence of anomalies such as the turn of the year exist
The evidence suggests that there is some role for active management
Market Timing
• Adjust the portfolio for movements in the market
• Shift between stocks and money market instruments or
bonds
• Results: higher returns, lower risk (downside is
eliminated)
• With perfect ability to forecast behaves like an option
Rate of Return of a
Perfect Market Timer
rf
rM
rf
Returns from 1987 - 1996
Year Lg. Stock Return T-Bill Return
87 5.34 5.50
88 16.86 6.44
89 31.34 8.32
90 -3.20 7.86
91 30.66 5.65
92 7.71 3.54
93 9.87 2.97
94 1.29 3.91
95 37.71 5.58
96 23.00 5.20
Average 16.06
Standard Dev. 14.05
With Perfect Forecasting Ability
• Switch to T-Bills in 87, 90 and 94
• No negative returns or losses
• Average Ret. = 17.44%
• S.D. Ret. = 12.38%
• Results with perfect timing
• Increase in mean return
• Lower S.D.
With Imperfect Ability to Forecast
Passive Portfolio :
2
2 E (r m ) - r f
S m =[ ]
m
Reward to Variability Measures
Appraisal Ratio:
α A
(eA)
Combined Portfolio :
2
2 E (r m ) - r f A
2
S p =[ ] +[ ]
m eA
Treynor-Black Allocation
CAL
E(r) CML
P A
Rf
Summary Points:
Treynor-Black Model
• Sharpe Measure will increase with added ability to
pick stocks
• Slope of CAL>CML
(rp-rf)/p > (rm-rf)/p
• P is the portfolio that combines the passively
managed portfolio with the actively managed
portfolio
• The combined efficient frontier has a higher return
for the same level of risk
The cycle of investing process
high prices
Growth
Value
Low prices
59
Asymmetries...
Basic Principles
Relationships Framework
1. Commodity prices and bond prices usually trend in the opposite direction. (Commodity prices
and bond yields usually trend in the same direction.)
2. Bonds and stocks move together (unless in deflation)
3. Bonds lead the stock market at the turns
4. The dollar and commodities move inversely (particularly gold).
5. A rising dollar is normally good for U.S. stocks and bonds because it is noninflationary.
6. Gold leads turns in the CRB at the turns
Equally Important :
7. Relationships between various futures markets and related stock groups
(e.g. COMEX Gold & gold mining shares)
8. The relationship between the CRB Index and the various commodity groups
9. Action between related commodity groups (precious metals and energy markets)
1O. Action within commodity groups (gold to platinum, crude and heating oil)
11. Action between currency pairs
Correlation matrix : an example
62
Rising Bond Prices are Usually Good for Stock Prices
The line along the bottom shows the positive correlation between
T-bond prices and the S&P 500
Commodity Prices and Bond Prices Normally Trend in the Opposite
Directions
A Rising Dollar Normally has a Depressing Effect on Commodity Markets
The US$ and Gold Prices Usually Trend in Opposite Directions
Usually a Very Close Linkage Between
Bond Prices and Utilities
Asset Allocation & Market Timing Uses
Economic Forecasting
Asset Allocation & Market Timing Uses
Sector Rotation
Adding hedge funds to diversify...different strategies
71
Adding hedge funds? Some examples
HEDGED
TRADING
L+S ARBITRAGE
L>S or L<S L or S
DIRECTIONAL L
L=S
74
PRIVATE MANAGEMENT FIRM
•
CASE STUDY
•
•
CASE STUDY