The Gibe II Hydropower Plant in Ethiopia encountered significant geological challenges during construction of its 25.8 km headrace tunnel. Event 19 was the most difficult, involving a mud extrusion that pushed the tunnel boring machine back over 60 cm. Mitigation required dredging 40,000 cubic meters of mud over 2 years and building a 230 meter bypass tunnel. About 10 days after completion, a 15 meter collapse occurred in the headrace tunnel due to a rockfall in weak, undetected ground above the lining.
The Gibe II Hydropower Plant in Ethiopia encountered significant geological challenges during construction of its 25.8 km headrace tunnel. Event 19 was the most difficult, involving a mud extrusion that pushed the tunnel boring machine back over 60 cm. Mitigation required dredging 40,000 cubic meters of mud over 2 years and building a 230 meter bypass tunnel. About 10 days after completion, a 15 meter collapse occurred in the headrace tunnel due to a rockfall in weak, undetected ground above the lining.
The Gibe II Hydropower Plant in Ethiopia encountered significant geological challenges during construction of its 25.8 km headrace tunnel. Event 19 was the most difficult, involving a mud extrusion that pushed the tunnel boring machine back over 60 cm. Mitigation required dredging 40,000 cubic meters of mud over 2 years and building a 230 meter bypass tunnel. About 10 days after completion, a 15 meter collapse occurred in the headrace tunnel due to a rockfall in weak, undetected ground above the lining.
The Gibe II Hydropower Plant in Ethiopia encountered significant geological challenges during construction of its 25.8 km headrace tunnel. Event 19 was the most difficult, involving a mud extrusion that pushed the tunnel boring machine back over 60 cm. Mitigation required dredging 40,000 cubic meters of mud over 2 years and building a 230 meter bypass tunnel. About 10 days after completion, a 15 meter collapse occurred in the headrace tunnel due to a rockfall in weak, undetected ground above the lining.
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 29
Gibe II Hydropower Plant
Company name Background of the project
• Gibe II hydropower plant is the second stage of the
Gibe-Omo hydroelectric cascade which includes Gibe I and Gibe III (all in operation), koysha(under construction). • The 420 megawatt project, southwest of Addis Ababa, was said it will increase Ethiopia's electricity generation capacity by 38 percent. • It includes one of Africa’s longest hydraulic tunnel, more than 25 km long below the Fofa mountains. • Designed by Studio Pietrangeli, with engineering supervision by ELC- Electroconsult. Project Name Gilgle Gibe II Client Ethiopian government(EEP) Project cost 500 million euro Project area The Lower Valley of the Omo River, Ethiopia.
Italy’s funding (59%) is added to the € 50 million (13%)
credit from the European Investment Bank to finance the electromechanical supplies; the Ethiopian contribution amounts to at least € 103.5 million (28%). Main features
• Gravity Dam ( H = 49 m, L = 140 m )
• Main Roads ( 65 km ) • Power Tunnel ( L = 25.8 km, D = 6 m ) • Penstocks ( No. 2, L = 1.1 km, D = 3.6 ÷ 2.8 m ) • Surge Shaft ( H = 95.5 m, D = 18 m ) • Outdoor Power House ( No. 4 Pelton turbines IP = 4x105 MW ) • 400 kV Switchyard Tunnel construction and challenges
• The TBMs selected for the headrace drives were two
6.98m diameter DSUs that would bore from either end of the tunnel, on Inlet and Outlet drives. Water Conveyance Project Main Data Purpose HPP (432 MW) Tunnel Length 25.8 Km Internal Tunnel Diameter 6.3 m Design Discharge 100 M3/s Design Internal Pressure min 2. bar and max. 7 bar Lining Geometrical Characteristics Segment Type Hexagonal Segment Thickness 25 cm Segmental Lining Outside Diameter 6,800 mm Segmental Lining Final Internal 6,300 mm Segment Width 1,600 mm type of lining : hexagonal precast concrete segmental lining Challenges Encountered
• The TBMs encountered 24 geological difficulties, or
classified, ‘events’, of varying scale and nature on the headrace excavations. • 15 in the Inlet drive and nine in the Outlet drive. • By far the most difficult to overcome was Event 19, on the Inlet drive. • Event 19 was happened in October 2006 during the construction of the tunnel • The failure was happened when the tunneling crew hit a pocket of wet earth along a major fault line at the location of 4 kilometers from the tunnel inlet • Only 4 kilometers into the boring Wet and humid mud under a pressure of as much as 40 Bars and with temperatures reaching 40 centigrade gushed out .. Event 19
• At the end of October 2006, the TBM was
pushed back as consequence of the sudden extrusion and collapse of the tunnel face against the cutter head and the front shield. • The tunnel face moved towards the TBM 40- 60mm/hour. • The TBM has been pushed back more than 60 cm and displaced laterally more than 40 cm. • Efforts were made first to open a small tunnel over the TBM to start to release the shield but high rock pressures prevented success. • Next, a Back Chamber was to be opened up fully around the TBM and also an exploratory adit was excavated to the left from which boreholes would be drilled to probe the weak rock mass nearer the fault. Tail TBM Shield damaged and bent Lining segment moved and severely damaged Overview of the TBM shield left part and installed lining segments Extruding mud in the Exploratory Adit • In June 2007 a collapse of the front face started at the left Exploratory Adit • producing three controlled leaching of about 3500 m3 of mud, which filled the all Adit, and about 80m of the power tunnel Extruding mud in the power tunnel Strategies used As mitigation for the mud problem The solution to these series of unforeseen events involved (i) building a new 230meters of bypass tunnel, changing the original layout(direction) of the tunnel, (ii) dredging as much as 40,000 cubic meter of mud continuously for 2 years (between October 2006 – August 2008), and (iii) filling out the failed section of the tunnel with concrete. • To facilitate TBM steering at the excavation resuming and to reinforce the pillar between the two tunnels, in the transition zone the old tunnel has been filled with concrete. • The TBM has been refurbished and re-assembled in the tunnel. • The excavation diameter was enlarged from 6980mm to 7074mm. • The TBM was relaunched in August 2008 on a bypass route(230m) around the fault, through which resin injection was used to help consolidate the clayey basalt and to limit squeezing, • Beyond the fault the TBM rejoined the headrace alignment. • The success of the intervention was possible only after the releasing of the pressure and the stresses acting in the area and surrounding the TBM. • Some numbers are significant for the Event 19:
3500m3 of mud flowed and removed
39600m3 of water drained during the intervention 230m of Exploratory Adit excavated with traditional method 1600 m of investigation boreholes • About ten days after the project was completed, about 15 m of the 26 km headrace tunnel collapsed.
• The collapse may have been attributed it to structural
failure caused by expedited construction and a lack of proper studies. • The investigations have revealed the cause to be a rockfall at a zone of undetected, weak ground above and well behind the tunnel lining.
• It is believed the weak rock mass, comprising some loose
large blocks in weak soil, was agitated by hydraulic pressure variations induced by the active headrace. • The official statement of the construction firm Salini Costruttori, released two weeks after the official inauguration was that "an unforeseen geological event provoked a 'cave in' and a huge rock fall involving about 15m of the 26km headrace tunnel. • The tunnel was repaired and the station operational again on December 26, 2010 Thank you