Pipelines Stress Analysis Report Slides
Pipelines Stress Analysis Report Slides
Pipelines Stress Analysis Report Slides
Contents
Introduction
Steps of piping system design
Stress analysis techniques
Classification of loads
Primary Vs Secondary loads
Static Vs Dynamic loads
Principal stresses
Applied loads which causes normal and shear stresses
Theories of failure
Piping codes
ASME B31.1
ASME B31.3
ASME B31.9
Contents
Pipe Supports
Different types of supports
Piping systems supports designing
Buried pipes design
Soil Mechanics
Rigid Vs flexible pipes
Water systems
Marston load theory
Introduction to piping stress analysis
Pipes are the most delicate components in any process
plant.
It is very important to take note of all potential loads that a
piping system would encounter during operation as well as
during other stages in the life cycle of a process plant.
Ignoring any such load while designing, erecting, hydro-
testing, start-up shut-down, normal operation, maintenance
etc. can lead to inadequate design and engineering of
a piping system.
Stress analysis and safe design normally require
appreciation of several related concepts.
Steps of piping system design
An approximate list of the steps that would be involved is as
follows:
1. Identify potential loads.
2. Relate each one of these loads to the stresses and strains.
3. Decide the worst three dimensional stress state .
4. Get the cumulative effect of all the potential, loads on
the 3-D stress scenario in the piping system under
consideration.
5. Alter piping system design to ensure that the stress
pattern is within failure limits.
Stress analysis techniques
The analysis of stresses may be carried to varying degrees
of refinement.
Manual systems allow for the analysis of simple systems.
There are methods like chart solutions (for three-dimensional
routings) and rules of thumb (for number and placement of
supports) etc. involving long and tedious computations and
high expense.
All such methods may be classified as follows:
1. Approximate methods dealing only with special piping
configurations of two-three or four-member systems .
The approximate methods falling into this category are
limited in scope of direct application.
Stress analysis techniques
2. Methods restricted to square-corner, single-plane systems
with two fixed ends, but without limit as to the number of
members.
3. Methods adaptable to space configurations with square
corners and two fixed ends.
4. Extensions of the previous methods to provide for
the special properties of curved pipe by indirect means,
usually a virtual length correction factor.
Classification of loads and failure
modes
Classification of loads:
A. Primary Loads.
B. Secondary Loads.
Axial Load
Internal / External Pressure
Bending Load
Shear Load
Torsional Load
Axial Load
A pipe may face an axial force (FL).
It could be tensile or compressive.
Internal / External Pressure
A pipe used for transporting fluid would be under internal
pressure load. (Like jacketed pipe core or tubes in a Shell)
Bending Load
The bending moment can be related to normal and shear
stresses.
Pipe bending is caused mainly due to two reasons: Uniform
weight load and concentrated weight load
Bending Load
Stress due to bending moment is not uniform through all the
pipe’s cross section
Shear Load
Shear load causes shear stresses.
Shear load may be of different types. Common load is the
shear force (V) acting on the cross-section of the pipe
Torsional Load
The shear stress caused due to torsion is maximum at outer
pipe radius & it is given in terms of the torsional moment and
pipe dimensions.
Allowable stresses
Where
P = Internal design gage pressure [psi or kPa]
The pressure is either given or solved for in the equations.
S = Maximum allowable stress values in tension for the material
at the design temperature [psi or kPa]
E,F,A = welding efficiency , casting factor and additional
thickness respectively
ASME 31.1 Limits
The code also specify the limits for :
sustained and displacement stresses
Where :
Ss = Sustained stress i = Stress Intensification factor.
Sh = Basic allowable stress at the operating temperature
MA = Resultant moment due to primary loads
= ( Mx² + My² + Mz² ) 0.5
ASME 31.1 Limits cont.
Occasional stresses
Where:
So = Occasional stress. K = Occasional load factor
Expansion stresses
Where:
SA = Allowable expansion stress range
ASME 31.1 Flexibility analysis
Scope
The scope of this code includes all fluids. This scope specifically
excludes the following:
Piping with an internal design pressure between 0 and 15 psi
(105 kPa)
Tubes inside fired heaters
Pressure vessels, heat exchangers, pumps, or compressors.
ASME 31.3 cont.
Design criterion
The difference between ASME 31.1 and 31.3 that 31.1 is focused
more on steel pipe and fittings, while 31.3 pertains more to
nonmetallic pipe and fittings. The obvious reason is that process
piping deals with more fluids that are corrosive to steel. In many
cases, thermoplastics, thermosetting plastics, and resins will be
more appropriate materials for the fluids handled in the purview of
the process piping code.
Fluid Categories:
D fluids : nonflammable, nontoxic, and not damaging to human tissue.
design pressure does not exceed 150 psig (1035 kPa) & design
temperature is between -20°F and 366°F (-29°C and 186°C).
M fluids : a single exposure to a very small quantity could lead to serious
irreversible harm
High pressure fluid : higher than allowed in ASME B16.5 PN420
All fluids not listed in the above categories
ASME 31.3 Design equations
Where :
tm = Minimum required wall thickness [in or mm].
t = Pressure design thickness, as determined by
any of the Formulas (3a) through (3b) [in or mm].
c = Mechanical, corrosion, or erosion allowances [in or mm]
S = Stress in material at the design temperature [psi or kPa].
E = Quality Factor W = Weld Joint Strength Factor.
Y = A coefficient used to account for material creep
ASME 31.3 Limits
As ASME 31.1, ASME 31.3 has limits formulas
For sustain stresses
Where :
FAX = Axial force due to sustained ( primary ) loading
Mi = In-plane loading moment due to sustained ( primary )
Mo = Out-plane loading moment due to sustained ( primary )
loading.
ii , io = in-plane and out –plane stress intensification factors.
Sh = Basic allowable stress at operating temperature.
ASME 31.3 Limits cont.
For expansion
Where:
SE = Expansion stress range
MT = Range or torsional bending moment due to expansion
load
SA = Allowable stress range.
ASME 31.3 cont.
ASME 31.3 specify branching specifications for each fluid
category defining some parameters and requirements
The run pipe diameter-to-thickness ratio (Dh/Th) < 100
the branch-to-run diameter ratio (Db/Dh) is not greater than 1.0.
If Dh/Th >= 100, the branch diameter Db has to be less than one-
half the run diameter Dh.
The angle between the branch and run is at least 45°.
Another section of ASME 31.3 is for the welding types for
each fluid category
ASME 31.3 also discussed the pipes that required to be
“safeguarded “ ( need more protective measures to minimize
the risk of accidental damage to a piping system)
ASME 31.3 Testing
Leak test: all piping designed in accordance with B31.3 be
leak tested according to fluid category the test steps is
specified.
Hydrostatic test: As in ASME 31.1
pneumatic leak test: Due to the possibility of brittle fracture of
nonmetallic piping which may be found in systems under the
scope of B31.3 the test requires a pressure relief device
having a set pressure of the test pressure plus the smaller of
50 psi or 10 percent of the test pressure.
Because chemical piping can involve core complicated
equipment and piping designs, there may be additional
factors to be considered in a pressure test.
Because there may be elevated temperatures, the code
includes a provision for establishing a more appropriate test
pressure.
ASME 31.9 Building services piping
The scope of this code envelopes industrial, institutional,
commercial, public buildings and multi-unit residences.
there are many similarities between B31.9 and B31.1.
Both codes cover boiler external piping. However, B31.9
includes steam boilers up to 15 psig maximum, while B31.1
uses 15 psig as a lower limit of its scope. Similarly, B31.9
includes water heating units up to 160 psig maximum, while
B31.1 uses 160 psig as its lower limit for hot water.
ASME 31.9 Design equations
Where :
the variables are defined as in ASME B31.1.
tm = Minimum required wall thickness[in. or mm]
P = Internal design gage pressure [psi or kPa]
The pressure is either given or solved for in the equations.
S = Maximum allowable stress values in tension for the material
at the design temperature [psi or kPa]
E, A = welding efficiency and additional thickness respectively
Pipe supports
For the special case when the side fill and pipe have the
same stiffness.
Pipe stiffness versus soil
compressibility
Measurements revealed that the load on a flexible pipe is
substantially less than that on a rigid pipe.
The magnitude of this difference in loads may be a little
shocking.
Suppose a weight is placed on a spring. We realize the
spring will deform, resisting deflection because of its spring
stiffness.
When load versus deflection is plotted, we find that this
relationship is linear up to the elastic limit of the spring
Pipe stiffness versus soil
compressibility
When a load is placed on a flexible pipe, the pipe also
deflects and resists deflection because of its stiffness. It is
even possible to think of soil as being a nonlinear spring that
resists movement or deflection because of its stiffness.
Pipe stiffness versus soil
compressibility
we can easily visualize the soil deforming and the pipe
carrying the majority of the load.
If the situation is reversed, placing a flexible spring between
two springs(soil), we can picture the pipe deflecting and the
soil is being forced to carry the load to a greater extent.
Pipe stiffness versus soil
compressibility
Pipe stiffness versus soil compressibility
When a flexible pipe is buried in the soil, the pipe and soil
then work as a system in resisting the load.
Pipe stiffness versus soil
compressibility
The reduction in load imposed on a pipe because of its
flexibility is referred to as arching. However, the overall
performance is not just due to arching, but is also due to the
soil at the sides of the pipe resisting deflection
Continue Marston load theory
Prism load
It is the weight. of the soil over the pipe
Again, Eq. (2.4) represents a maximum-type loading
condition, and Eq. (2.10) represents a minimum.