The document discusses two models of self-concept: the differentiated model and the global model. The differentiated model views self-concept as multiple, integrated cognitive structures. The global model, proposed by Shavelson, Hubner, and Stanton, refers to the extent one's perception of self is clearly and consistently defined across broad arenas and situations. While hierarchical, the global model views self-concept as multidimensional, with overall self-esteem built on specific perceptions and capable of varying between situations.
The document discusses two models of self-concept: the differentiated model and the global model. The differentiated model views self-concept as multiple, integrated cognitive structures. The global model, proposed by Shavelson, Hubner, and Stanton, refers to the extent one's perception of self is clearly and consistently defined across broad arenas and situations. While hierarchical, the global model views self-concept as multidimensional, with overall self-esteem built on specific perceptions and capable of varying between situations.
The document discusses two models of self-concept: the differentiated model and the global model. The differentiated model views self-concept as multiple, integrated cognitive structures. The global model, proposed by Shavelson, Hubner, and Stanton, refers to the extent one's perception of self is clearly and consistently defined across broad arenas and situations. While hierarchical, the global model views self-concept as multidimensional, with overall self-esteem built on specific perceptions and capable of varying between situations.
The document discusses two models of self-concept: the differentiated model and the global model. The differentiated model views self-concept as multiple, integrated cognitive structures. The global model, proposed by Shavelson, Hubner, and Stanton, refers to the extent one's perception of self is clearly and consistently defined across broad arenas and situations. While hierarchical, the global model views self-concept as multidimensional, with overall self-esteem built on specific perceptions and capable of varying between situations.
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1/ 15
Global Vs.
Differentiated Models Contents 01 James Murray Bowen
02 Differentiated Model
03 Shavelson, Hubner, Stanton
04 Global Model Total self concept of Differentiated Model It views the self as multiple cognitive structure and is integrated into one single view of the self. James Murray Bowen Bowen supports the conception that anxiety and stress can disrupt the quality of one's relationship. Differentiation and Fusion of Self These refers to the extent in which an individual can separate their emotional and intellectual selves. The Fused self is characterized as Pseudo Self. Solid self is the differentiated self. Pseudo Self Solid Self Pseudo is false self. Solid is true self. (Can be ideal self) Solid Self Pseudo Self The solid self knows what it needs and Pseudo self reacts to those around it. desires. The solid self has beliefs, The pseudo self is a product of opinions, convictions and life principles. emotional pressure.
The solid self maintains its individuality In an unhealthy relationship, two pseudo and does not merge. selves come together and fuse into each other, one person losing and the other person gaining self. Total self concept of Global Model Global self stems from the theory of Shavelson, Hubner, and Stanton. Shavelson, Hubner, Stanton They said that the global self refers to the extent to which one's perception of the self is clearly and consistently defined. One’s view of self is an indication of how the person makes sense of her/himself. (Huang, 2011).
The portrayal is a subjective representation and, as
such, may be distorted (Frank, 2011). Shavelson, Hubner, and Stanton’s (1976) multidimensional and hierarchical model of self-concept uses global self-concept and self-esteem interchangeably.
Global Self Concept / Self-esteem
Perception of self in broader areas
Views of personal behavior in
specific situations As illustrated, global self-concept and self-esteem are built on perceptions of self in various broad arenas (e.g., academic and non-academic) and can be further divided into more specific components. While the hierarchical nature of self-concept remains theoretical, educational research supports viewing the construct as multidimensional. Global self-esteem can be high (some prefer the term “healthy”) but rather low in a specific situation or in relation to a specific activity.
For example, Jane may have high overall self-esteem and
have a positive view of herself as a dancer, and yet have low self-esteem about communicating in a second language. Self-efficacy is a construct that was developed to distinguish beliefs about one’s capability to successfully achieve specific goals (Huang, 2011). Such self beliefs can vary in different contexts or activities (Pajares & Schunk, 2001). For instance, self-efficacy may change depending on whether one is dancing in front of peers, teachers or a crowd, or whether one is asked to perform in a studio, on the street, or on a stage.
